| Robert F. Hawes - Political Science - 2006 - 357 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy, or despotism in some form, is all that is left. . . Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other,... | |
| Norman Schofield - Political Science - 2006 - 3 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement is wholly inadmissable; so that rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form, is all that is left... This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow... | |
| Mark A. Graber - History - 2006 - 300 pages
...first inaugural stated; "the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that rejecting the majority principle, anarchy, or despotism in some form, is all that is left."12 Democratic majorities were specifically empowered, he argued, to resolve contested constitutional... | |
| Richard Striner - History - 2006 - 320 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy, or despotism in some form, is all that is left."91 With regard to Supreme Court decisions, Lincoln challenged the doctrine of unlimited judicial... | |
| Stephen L. Elkin - Political Science - 2006 - 428 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all there is left. 75 Not any sort of majority should rule, Madison believed; but neither should rule be... | |
| Various - Reference - 2007 - 228 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| |