| Michael Waldman - 363 pages
...Unanimity is impossible. The rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left — This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall... | |
| Donald P. Kommers, John E. Finn, Gary J. Jacobsohn - Law - 2004 - 502 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...assumed by some, that Constitutional questions are to Ix- decided by the Supreme Court; nor do I denythat such decisions must be binding, in any case, upon... | |
| David Barton - Law - 2000 - 548 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| Carl Schurz, James Russell Lowell, Ralph Waldo Emerson - History - 2005 - 197 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...object of that suit, while they are also entitled to yery high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government.... | |
| Peter Augustine Lawler, Robert Martin Schaefer - Political Science - 2005 - 444 pages
...Court. Citizens cannot be understood to have consented to the surrender of their own judgments. ... I do not forget the position assumed by some, that...object of that suit, while they are also entitled to a very high respect and consideration, in all parallel cases, by all other departments of government.... | |
| |