| Edward McPherson - History - 1865 - 678 pages
...from the assumption that there is some omnipotent and sacred supremacy pertaining to a ¿{tute — ilp & Solomons «тег having been a State out of the Union. The original ones passed into the Union even before... | |
| Henry Jarvis Raymond - United States - 1865 - 848 pages
...Union, who could have been brought to no snch thing the day before. This sophism derives ranch, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...State — to each 'State of our Federal Union. Our State* have neither more nor less power than that reserved to them in tha Union by the Constitution... | |
| Edward McPherson - History - 1865 - 690 pages
...Union who could have been brought to no euch thing the day before. This sophism derives much, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...some omnipotent and sacred supremacy pertaining to a Stale — to each State of our Federal Union. Oar States have neither more nor leu power than that... | |
| Henry Jarvis Raymond - United States - 1865 - 886 pages
...Union, who could have been brought to no such thing the day before. This sophism derives much, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...some omnipotent and sacred supremacy pertaining to a State^—to each State of our Federal Union. Our State* have neither more nor less power than that... | |
| Josiah Gilbert Holland - Biography & Autobiography - 1866 - 574 pages
...Union, who could have been brought to no such thing the day before. "This sophism derives much, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...Union. The original ones passed into the Union even before they cast off their British colonial dependence ; and the new ones each came into the Union... | |
| Josiah Gilbert Holland - Biography & Autobiography - 1866 - 568 pages
...Union, who could have been brought to no such thing the day before. "This sophism derives much, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...Constitution — no one of them ever having been a state oxvt of the Union. The original ones passed into the Union even before they cast off their British... | |
| Alexander Hamilton Stephens - Constitutional history - 1870 - 872 pages
...it appeared to him, he attempted to refute after this fashion : " This sophism derives much, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...Union. Our States have neither more nor less power than tJuit reserved to them in the Union by the Constitution — no one of them ever having been a State... | |
| Alexander Hamilton Stephens - Constitutional history - 1870 - 866 pages
...it appeared to him, he attempted to refute after this fashion: " This sophism derives much, perhaps the whole, of its currency from the assumption that...some omnipotent and sacred supremacy pertaining to a State—to each State of our Federal Union. Our States have neither more nor less power than that reserved... | |
| Alexander Hamilton Stephens - Constitutional history - 1870 - 940 pages
...refute an imaginary sophism, is that, wherein it is asserted, that " the States of the Federal Union have neither more nor less power than that reserved to them in the Union by the Constitution," us proof that the States are not Sovereign. For even according to this statement, every power was reserved... | |
| John William Draper - United States - 1868 - 630 pages
...withdraw at its pleasure from the Union. But, with the exception of Texas, not one of them had ever been a state out of the Union. The original ones passed into the Union before they had cast off British colonial dependence. Not one of the states, save Texas, had ever been... | |
| |