...king's special favour, during the time of war."27 So it was said in an early American case: "War gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property of the enemy, wherever found. The mitigations of this rigid rule which the humane and wise policy of modern times has introduced...

...Congress. The court said : " Respecting the power of government no doubt is entertained. That war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property, of the enemy wherever found, is conceded. The mitigations of this rigid rule which the humane and wise policy of modern times has...

...States (1814) 8 Cranch 110. In that case Chief Justice Marshall said in part : " * * * That war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property of the enemy, wherever found, is conceded. The mitigations of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern times has...

...Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. United States, supra: "That war gives to the sovereign full ripht to take the persons and confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found is conceded. The mitigations of < 1 3.-. NTS) this rigid rule, •which the humane and wise policy...

...the following statement: "Respecting the power of government, no doubt is entertained. That war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found is conceded. The mitigation of this rigid rule which the humane and wise policy of modern times has...

...governed by the same rule. Respecting the power of government no doubt is entertained. That war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found, is conceded. The mitigations | p. 123 of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern...

...1814 (found in 8 Cranch, 122), with reference to confiscation of enemy property, said that "war gives the sovereign full right to take the persons and confiscate the property of the enemy." but admitted that no nation could exercise such a right without "obloquy." It was decided in this case...

...delivered by the Chief Justice, John Marshall, who, in the course of his opinion, said that, while war gave to the sovereign "full right to take the...confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found," yet the "mitigations of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern times" had "introduced...

...courts authority to condemn enemy property. Chief Justice Marshall said, page 122: "Tliat war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found, is conceded. The mitigations of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern times has...

...Crouch 110. As was said by Chief Justice Marshall in Brown vs. United States, supra: "That war gives to the sovereign full right to take the persons and...confiscate the property of the enemy wherever found is conceded. The mitigation of this rigid rule, which the wise and humane policy of modern times has...