 | Edward McPherson - United States - 1882 - 680 pages
...does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible...decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while... | |
 | Frank Abial Flower - Republican Party - 1884 - 662 pages
...of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; and the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible....decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration... | |
 | George Sewall Boutwell - Presidential candidates - 1884 - 266 pages
...does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible;...decided by the Supreme Court; nor do I deny that such decision must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while... | |
 | Alexander Johnston - Speeches, addresses, etc., American - 1884 - 430 pages
...to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholy inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle,...anarchy or despotism, in some form, is all that is left. * * * Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other,... | |
 | John Alexander Logan - Lincoln-Douglas Debates, Ill., 1858 - 1886 - 912 pages
...does, of necessity, fly to anarchy, or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible;...anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left. ******* ''Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective Sections from each... | |
 | Edmund Clarence Stedman - American literature - 1888 - 600 pages
...does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible...anarchy or despotism, in some form, is all that is left Physicallv speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other,... | |
 | Stedman, Edmund C. and Hutchinson Ellen M. - 1888 - 600 pages
...does, of necessity, fly-to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible;...anarchy or despotism, in some form, is all that is left .... Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other,... | |
 | Judson Stuart Landon - Constitutional history - 1889 - 796 pages
...Lincoln, in his first inaugural address, referring to the then recent Dred Scott decision, said: — " I do not forget the position, assumed by some, that...nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding upon the parties to that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration... | |
 | United States - 1889 - 242 pages
...does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible...anarchy or despotism, in some form, is all that is left. . . . Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other,... | |
 | Paul Leicester Ford - United States - 1889 - 214 pages
...does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible...anarchy or despotism, in some form, is all that is left. . . . Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other,... | |
| |
Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left. 
