 | Horace Greeley - Slavery - 1865 - 704 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must bo binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they are also... | |
 | Henry Jarvis Raymond - United States - 1865 - 840 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decisions mast be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while they... | |
 | Edward McPherson - History - 1865 - 690 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rnle of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while... | |
 | George Washington Bacon - Biography - 1865 - 206 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of that suit, while... | |
 | Joseph Hartwell Barrett - Biography & Autobiography - 1865 - 878 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a majority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...are to b,e decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny-that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit, as to the object of... | |
 | Henry Jarvis Raymond - United States - 1865 - 864 pages
...Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Oourt ; nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding, in any case, upon the parties to a suit,... | |
 | Henry Jarvis Raymond - United States - 1865 - 848 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...the position assumed by some, that constitutional qnestions are to be decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding,... | |
 | Edward McPherson - United States - 1865 - 676 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so s constjtutiona'l questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision... | |
 | Edward McPherson - United States - 1865 - 676 pages
...Unanimity is impossible ; the rnle of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or...left. I do not forget the position assumed by some, th»t constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision... | |
 | Edward McPherson - History - 1865 - 680 pages
...arrangement, is wholly inadmissible ; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy «• deapotism in some form is all that is left. I do not forget the position assumed by some, «lit constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court ; nor do I deny that such decision... | |
| |
Unanimity is impossible ; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible. So that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism, in some form, is all that is left. 
