...or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law, as it passed, is the will of the majority of both houses,...comparing it when any ambiguity exists with the laws on the same subject, and looking, If necessary, to the public history of the times in which it was...

...or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both Houses, and the only mode in which that will Is spoken Is the act Itself; and we must gather their intention from the language used, comparing it when any ambiguity...

...motives or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law as passed Is the will of the majority of both houses,...comparing it, when any ambiguity exists, with the laws on the same subject, and looking, If necessary, to the public history of the times in which it was...

...or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both Houses, and the only mode in which that will is spoken is the act itself, and we must gather their intention from the language thev used, comparing it, when...

...particular provisions in it. In Aldridge et al. v. Williams (3 How., 8, 23), it is stated: The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both Houses,...necessary, to the public history of the times in which it was passed. In United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association (166 US, 290, 318), the court said:...

...or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both Houses, and the only mode in which that will is spoken is the act itself, and we must gather their intention from the language they used, comparing it, when...

...or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both Houses,...necessary, to the public history of the times in which it was passed. But, while the views of individual Members of the Congress, expressed in debate, have not...

...or reasons assigned by them for supporting or opposing amendments that were offered. The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both houses,...necessary, to the public history of the times in which it was passed. At any rate, we have been unable to find where any court has held that statements made...

...the enactment process. III. Selected Problems of Legislative History A. Public History "The law as it passed is the will of the majority of both houses,...necessary, to the public history of the times in which it was passed. " Roger B. Taney «^ 44 Id. at 94 (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). 445 See id. at 95. 46...

...statute by individual members of Congress in debate because "the only mode in which [the legislative] will is spoken is in the act itself; and we must gather their intention from the language there used . . . ." 239 In 1875, the Court reiterated that "we are not at liberty to recur to the views of individual...