Page images
PDF
EPUB

most arbitrary and grinding systems of monopoly ever known in any country. Mr. Greeley is nothing if not a protectionist.

[ocr errors]

The last objection to Mr. Greeley which we shall here mention is the grossness of his manners. General Grant is sometimes complained of as not filling the executive chair with the decorum and dignity which properly belong to the place; but his deficiency in this respect is the deficiency of one not accustomed to polished society, giving little heed to certain conventionalities which really become the high sphere he moves in, as Mr. Greeley so often is.

These are some of the objections which will occur to thoughtful men when they hear of Mr. Greeley's nomination; and allowing these the weight which they fully deserve, we must advise our readers to refuse the nomination their support. With such a head as is on his shoulders the affairs of the nation could not, under his direction, be wisely administered; with such manners as his, they could not be administered with common decorum; with such associates as he has taken to his bosom, they could not be administered with common integrity,"

CHAPTER XXVI.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Its Record During and Since the War-Some Nice Tidbits from the History of Greeley's Present Allies-The Essence of their Poliey Then the Same as Now-A Democratic Club of 500,000-Greeley's New York Associates -Who and What They Are-Greeley the Ring Candidate-That Good, Honest Soul-What he has Promised to Do for Them-Frank Blair as Painted by H. G.-The Southern Aristocrats, Ditto-Some of Greeley's Western Friends-Democratic Record on Financial Questions-On Congressional Abuses-The Original Nominator of H. G.-He Favors Repudiation of the Yankee War Debt and a Return of Negroes to Slavery-A Question by H. G. in 1864-Will he Answer it in 1872?

The action of the Democratic party at Baltimore, in nominating Horace Greeley as its candidate upon his secession record and his amnesty principles, has two effects. It completely stultifies the course of those "Liberal Republicans" who claim to be still Republicans, and who arrogate to themselves much virtue for breaking up the Democratic party; and it also makes Greeley distinctively the Democratic candidate for the Presidency, just as Judge Chase would have been in 1868, if he had secured the nomination which he then so ardently coveted. Greeley is the candidate of the regular Democratic organization. Democratic discipline will be brought to bear to whip voters into (507)

30

his ranks, and Democratic money, doled out by Augustus Schell and Cyrus H. McCormick, will be used to buy such as will yield to no other incentive. The friends of the Democratic party, therefore, are Greeley's friends, and the friends of Greeley are its friends.

RECORD OF THE DEMOCRACY.

The record of the Democratic party prior to the Administration of James Buchanan, is not of much account in this connection, since all national issues assumed a new phase with the dawn of secession and civil strife. It will be recollected, however, that the Democratic party (so called because it was not democratic but oligarchic) was the party of Slavery before the war, and that ever since the firing upon Sumpter, it has been the opponent of all measures for putting down the Slaveholders' Rebellion, and for realizing the results of the defeat of that rebellion. Its personnel. is practically the same now as then; and its perpetuation of itself at Baltimore-its refusal to adopt the "possum" policy signifies nothing less than the determination to keep alive the aspirations and purposes of 1861-63-64-66, and those years; a determination which is doubtless reinforced by confidence in Greeley's devotion as a neophyte to their cause, and especially by his promise in a recent letter to a Hartford gentleman, to deal out the loaves and fishes of office to copperhead Democrats in proportion to the number of votes which they cast for him.

We will refresh the recollection of the reader with a few facts in the record of the Democracy— and but a few, since they are all so notorious and so uniformly unpatriotic as to be an uninviting theme for the chronicler.

BUCHANAN AND HIS CABINET.

In the winter of 1860-1, when the rebellion broke out, the Democratic party was in power, as it now seeks to be. It had in the Presidential chair an old fussy man, such as it now seeks to put in, who held, as Greeley holds, that the national government had no right to coerce a State into loyalty. That fussy old man, James Buchanan, had very much such a pro-Southern cabinet as Greeley may be expected to appoint if he succeeds in being elected next November. In this cabinet the Secretary of War was J. B. Floyd-the same who afterwards ran away from Grant at Fort Donelson. Among the exploits of Floyd, in behalf of the Southern Confederacy and the Democratic party, just before the storm broke, was to transfer from Northern to Southern arsenals 105,000 stand of muskets and 10,000 rifles. At the same time forty columbiads and four 32-pounders were moved from Pittsburgh to Ship Island, La., and seventy columbiads and seven 32-pounders from the same foundries to Galveston, although the fortifications at Galveston, on which the guns were to be used, were not to be done in five years. At the same time, also, the navy of the United States was by the the Secretary of that Department scattered and

the vessels assigned either to Southern ports, where they could be captured by the Rebels, or to remote stations, whence they could not be recalled in months.

Buchanan's other cabinet officers also rallied in support of the rebellion. Jeremiah S. Black-one of Greeley's supporters-then Attorney General, decided solemnly that the President had no power to call out the militia; though a committee of Congress appointed that winter said "Yes, the power is distinctly conferred by the statute of February 28, 1795."

President Buchanan informed the country, in his last message, Dec. 4, 1860, that "the Constitution did not delegate to Congress or to any other department of the Federal Government, the power to coerce a State into submission which is attempting to withdraw, or has actually withdrawn from the Union."

THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS.

It will be recollected that the members of the House of Representatives which was chosen in 1860, did not take their seats until after the session of March 4th of the following year, and that the members from the seceding states maintained their seats for a time, thus leaving the Democrats a large vote in each house until near the close of the 37th Congress. The propositions made in Congress during that eventful winter, with a view of settling with the South by compromise, were many of them

« PreviousContinue »