Page images
PDF
EPUB

The historians of the stage seem, indeed, to have concurred in ascribing the origin of the drama to the ode and chorus, set to music, and performed in honour of the heathen god Bacchus; into which, first one, then two, and then more speakers were introduced, till, in a short time, it arrived at the state in which we have it in the ancient Greek tra gedians; and this was from about the year 536 to the year 400 before the christian æra. So far, perhaps, it may justly be traced to heathenism and to the author of it: but it an inquiry, whence the then becomes heathens acquired this ode and chorus in honour of their gods? The probability is, that it

Being, or vilifies his providence, or dishonours his name, or tends to the advancement of virtue and true religion; as it is calculated to stimulate man to the performance of good actions, and to render him honest, patient, just, temperate, liberal, merciful, and benevolent; as it serves to degrade the vicious, and to exalt the virtuous, Regulated in this way, the drama may be made a powerful instrument of bettering the hearts of men; and the theatre, which is resorted to for the purpose of relaxation or pleasure, may prove a school of moral instruction. Mr. Plumptre's method is that of mild-was borrowed or rather stolen, from the worship

ness and persuasion. Alluding to Jeremy
Collier, and the fierce opposers of the
drama, he says,
" even the unconcilia-
ting invectives against the stage have
had their effect in opening the eyes of
people to the immoralities and dangers
of it, and contributed towards its amend-
ment. What then, may not be expected
from endeavours set about in the spirit of
charity? The attempt is at least desirable
and commendable; let us sow the good
seed, and trust in the bounty of Provi-
dence for an abundant harvest."

His reasoning is erected upon this unquestionable logical axiom-ab abusu in usum non valet argumentum.-Abstractedly considered, the drama is neither bad nor good. The mere form of dialogue, and the introduction of characters, (personce,) have nothing in them either to approve or reprehend. If the drama be abused by the introduction of vitiated morality, obscenity, blasphemy; or even licentious spectacle, 'Pnuara agya, loose and idle language, needless appeals to heaven, and wanton obtestations of the Supreme Being, or the holy, angels, who cannot be adjured without presupposing them invested with omniscience; such abuse furnishes most cogent reasons for judicious and due restrictions, and for a vigilance proportioned to the powerful effect of dramatic representation. Under such controul, why may not the stage become an unimpeachable mean of correcting vice, exposing folly, and checking moral evil?We must refer our readers, however, to the book itself, to see how the argument is

conducted.

We feel ourselves bound, nevertheless, to give a specimen or two of our author's style and mode of reasoning. As to the origin of the stage," for instance:

of the one true God, the Everlasting Jehovah,
to furnish out idolatrous rites for the abomina
tion of the gentiles. Certain it is, that some
of the Psalms of David (who died 1015 years
before Christ) are written in this manner;
and the song of Moses, on the deliverance of
the Israelites from their Egyptian oppressors,
in the year 1491 before Christ, is in the same
style of chorus and semi-chorus intermixed.
But, we have an instance in the sacred
writings, which seems to come much nearer
to our idea of the modern, or rather of the
ancient drama. The Song of Solomon is now
almost universally acknowledged to have been
the Epithalamium, or marriage song, of that
monarch, composed on the celebration of
his nuptials with the Shulamite, in the year
1014 B. C.; and was probably performed on
that occasion, somewhat after the manner of
our cathedral service, or of the sacred dramas,
called oratorios, in these days. The author
of the Key to the Old Testament observes,
"This book may be considered, as to its form,
a dramatical poem of the pastoral kind.
There is a succession of time, and a change
of place, to different parts of the palace and
royal gardens. The personages introduced as
speakers are the bridegroom and bride, with
their respective attendants, together, as some
suppose, with the sister of the bride; and
if the ingenious theory of Harmer be ad-
mitted, the first and degraded wife of Solo-
mon, whom he considers as the figure of the
Jewish church. There is certainly an inter-
change of dialogue.-The companions of the
bride compose a kind of chorus, which seem
to bear some resemblance to that which after
wards obtained in the Grecian tragedy. So
lomon and his queen sometimes speak i
assumed characters,

and represent them selves in fictitious circumstances. They de scend, as it were, from the throne; an adopt, with the pastoral dress, that simplicity of style, which is favourable to the communi cation of their sentiments."*

There is another of the sacred books, th

Gray's Key, p. 307.

book of Job, which, though it cannot be considered as a regular drama, yet certainly is written very much in the dramatic form, as the parties are introduced speaking with great fidelity of character, and as it deviates from strict historical accuracy for the sake of effect" (Gray, p. 250.) An expositor of the Bible, indeed, goes so far as to say; " It is undoubtedly a piece of dramatic poetry; that the several answers to Job's pleas make three distinct acts, Elihu's reply a fourth; the deity concluding in the fifth: the historical pants at the beginning and the end are a kind of prologue and epilogue, which, like those of the ancients, are plain narrations ilJustrating the poetical parts." The opinion most anciently and generally entertained respecting this book, was, that it composed by Moses to comfort the Israelites during their afflictions in Egypt; and others have supposed it to have been written by Ezekiel to comfort them during their captivity in Babylon."+

was

Now, although it must be acknowledged, that this sacred poem does not bear the form of a regular drama, and was not written for the purpose of being represented by different persons, sustaining the different characters introduced, which must always be considered as constituting what we mean by the general term drama, yet thus much we certainly learn from it, that this form of writing was considered, by persons acting under divine direcLon, as admirably well adapted to convey moral and religious truths. And though, in this particular instance, it would have been presumption in any one to have taken upon himself to represent the Almighty, or his angel, yet, of the other characters it may be said, that, if, instead of being read to the Jews by one person, it had been read by several, or if, instead of reading, the different parts had been committed to memory, and spoken, as if they had been the characters themselves, the effect would have been conaderably increased; and one cannot conceive wherein would have consisted the harm of thus delivering this lesson, or any other one d simila; concern. If, indeed, in doing

the, other circumstances had been added, such as profaneness towards God, or if false morals had been taught, or if the persons assembling to hear this lesson had been guilty of immoralities, then had these circumstances in themselves been wrong; but they would have been no part of the original design, and might have been separated from it again, and thas have left it in its original purity: and

[ocr errors][merged small]

this I take to be the case in the general question of the lawfulness of the stage. Abuses, and those grievous ones, no doubt, exist; but, though they have been long attached to the stage, they are by no means necessarily so, and might be separated from it, leaving it, not only an innocent amusement, but a highly rational and pleasing source of instruction.

It may be remarked, too, that St. Paul, (Acts xvii. 28.) in his address to the Athe-, nians, quotes the saying of one of their poets, and, in the xxvth ch. of 1. Cor. (v. 33.) he quotes the words of the dramatic poet Menander. Now, had he considered dramas as so absolutely unlawful, so bad in their origin, and so corrupt in their very nature, surely he would not have given this sanction to their instructive sayings?

Mr. P. says that "the stage seems to have adopted some sort of false religion, as it were, of its own; and so as to con: fuse the minds of its votaries, and lead them from the true God to lying fables." Its morality is often fantastic, and fre quently altogether false. These positions are elucidated by a copious appendage of notes, in which will be found many very interesting disquisitions. The plays quoted

or referred to are 154 in number.

With respect to the introduction of prayers on the stage, we subjoin a quotation, which will show our readers, the style in which the notes in general are framed.

My reasons for admitting of prayers, under certain restrictions, are given in the sermon. In addition to what I have there said, I will observe, that prayers and addresses to the deity are introduced into our oratorios, which, as I have before observed, (see p. 10 and 40) are dramatic representations; yet I never heard any one find fault with these. The objection then seems to be against the manner of introducing them, not against the thing itself, and I will therefore bring forward some instances of prayers, which I think are wrong and some which I consider as right.

In the first place, then, I would not allow of prayers offered to false objects, or to the true object upon a wrong occasion. Imogen,

*

In the poem of The Landscape, which contains many beauties and displays much taste, the author says:

To heaven devoutly I've address'd my prayer.

The attention is immediately roused to consider what can have thus excited his devotion; when we are told it is,

Again the moss-grown terraces to raise,
And spread the labyrinth's perplexing maze;

[blocks in formation]

Cut short all intermission; front to front, Bring thou this fiend of Scotland, and myself, Within my sword's length set him; if he 'scape,

A. IV. S. 3.

Heaven forgive him too! which implies a wish, that Heaven may not forgive him; which, notwithstanding the injuries Macduff had sustained, is certainly an unchristian wish.

I saw this play acted at Covent Garden Theatre, in October 1807, after some years entire absence from all theatres, during which time my ideas respecting plays had undergone very great changes. When the performer went down upon one knee and spoke this, I felt very much shocked.

To shew how prone mankind are to abstract their thoughts from christianity, when they get to the poets and the common occurrences of the world, I cannot forbear bringing forward a passage from THE BISHOP OF LANDAF's Speech intended to have been spoken in the House of Lords, November 22, 1807, wherein he says, speaking of the ruler of France, "There is not an adiniral, an officer, a sailor, in the British navy, who does not burn with impatience to have an opportunity of attacking the enemy; who is not ready to exclaim with Macduff,

Within my sword's length set him; if he 'scape, May heav'n forgive him too." ! p. 42. This is the more remarkable, as only three pages farther on, the venerable and pious prelate, speaking of the calamities which would befal us, were we to become a prey to the invader, says, "Sooner than all this should happen, I would say (did Christianity permit such a wish) may the fate of the Saguntines become the fate of Britons !"—p, 45. Replace in even lines the ductile yew, And plant again the ancient avenue. B. II. 1. 8. This surely is too trifling an occasion upon which to address heaven. In the same poem curses are bestowed in the same wanton style: Curse on the pedant jargon, that defines Beauty's unbounded forms by given lines! With scorn eternal mark the cautions fool, Who'dares not judge till he consults his rule. B. I. 1. 79. Core on the shrubbery's insipid scenes! &c. B. II. 1. 219.

And again,

[blocks in formation]

In Hamlet, A. III. S. 3. there is a scene where the King is represented as stung with remorse, on account of the discovery being made of his having murdered his brother Some of then and his reflections thereon. are very good, but the passage is too long and too well known to be quoted. At length h kneels, and continues for some time in tha posture, praying, or rather endeavouring t pray silently; till finding his soul too much distracted with a sense of his sin, he gives i up. During this scene Hamlet enters; and seeing him unguarded, would put him to death, but that he thinks killing him, whilst at his prayers, would be the mean of sending him to heaven, and so his father would not be revenged. This part of Hamlet's charac ter is so shocking, and contrary to the spirit of christianity, that it is omitted on the stage It is much to be wished that the same princi ple were extended. Our plays would then be much improved, and the passage before quoted from Macbeth would be equally omitted.

Will those who object to prayers acted upon the stage, allow children to be taught to kneel and lift up their hands, as in act of devotion before their heavenly Father, long before they can have an idea of such a Being as God? "Men are but children of a larger growth," and there are many grown persons, I fear, almost as little acquainted with their Creator and Redeemer, and as ignorant of the duty, and the nature and efficacy of prayer, as a child of a few years old can be, and to whom such a sight may be a valuable lesson.

In A World without Souls, (p. 25) are these remarkable words, which I submit to the consideration of the reader: "The first accents which Caroline St. Amand ever heard from the lips of her parents were those by which they taught her to know God: and her knees were bent, and her hands closed in

the stitade of devotion long before it was posle to know the object of prayer. They lared indeed to see her rehearse those scenes of piety, which they trusted she would act pon the stage of life."

It's an awful consideration that the two great theatres of the metropolis have so recently been laid in ashes. It were well that in the new theatres a new system of dramatic composition, a new system of theatrical representation, and a new system of management before the curtain could be adopted. Immoral as the stage is, what shall we say to the state of the labies! He must be either a bold or

an inconsiderate man who will lead his wife and his daughters through them, or permit his sons to encounter the swarms of prostitutes which infest them. They were not so in Garrick's time.

We heartily wish that a copy of Mr. Plumptre's book were put into the hands of every dramatic writer; that it were studied by the managers, and well considered by the Lord Chamberlain, and all who have any controul over the theatres. The LITERARY PANORAMA has never ailed to stigmatize offences against sense and decency committed by those who write for the stage; and we call upon all who labour for the public in the same department of literature, to co-operate with us. The public journalists, and the reviewers, should make it a common cause to set a mark of infamy on all dramatic authors who offend against religion and christian morality. We are proud of the attestation which Mr. P. bears to our zeal; with which we conclude our ac count of his book. After remarking," it is a pity that there is not some work particularly devoted to the examination of all our dramas which are acted in a season, both in a moral and religious point of view;" and lamenting that the monthly journals already established have not made this a more important article in their selection; he adds, in the last page of his work,

the oaths introduced, with references to 33 pages in which they appear; attaching blame to the licenser for suffering them to pass, and recommending the notice of this practice to the Society for the Suppression of Vice, and to the Magistrates. (See Literary Panorama, vol. iv. p. 299, also p. 288.) I wish that I had opportunity and leisure for referring to more If they are in the same style, I trust that they of those reviews before I close these notes. will have a considerable influence on the minds of all the different descriptions of persons concerned in our theatres, and most cordially do I wish them success.-(January the 3d, 1809.)

The Exposé; or, Napoleon Buonaparte

unmasked, in a condensed Statement of his Career and Atrocities; accompanied with Notes, &c. 8vo. pp. 240. bds. 6s. Miller, 1809.

THE man who ventures to expose a villain in his true colours, who strips him of the visor with which he seeks to delude the credulous multitude, confers an essential benefit on society. The readers of the LITERARY PANORAMA are pretty well acquainted with the " career and atrocities" of the Corsican; and, conse quently, are capable of forming a just estimate of his character; but, as there are people in the world who yet profess to admire him, the attempt to undeceive them is praiseworthy. We are told, that "the chief aim in the composition" before us" has been, to render the nar rative concise, to occupy the mind but for a short time in the reading, yet to endeavour to leave an impression which might come home to the bosom of every one; and, in this aim, the author has been successful. The subjoined excerpt, while it proves that his powers of con densation are not of an inferior descrip. tion, will also serve to enforce sentiments which we have frequently inculcated.

[ocr errors]

It is completely evident, from every step in his conduct, that peace with Buonaparte is invariably a deceitful cessation from arms, Since writing the foregoing sentences; and for his own advantage; and that he only just as this sheet is going to the printer's, a requires peace for a season, that he may gain friend has called my attention to the LITE-time to meditate new mischief, and effect it. RARY PANORAMA, for May 1808, in which there is a review of the comedy of the World, and which is very much in the style here mentioned.

The writer objects to two of the characters, on moral principles, and shews wherein the delineation is faulty. He mentions, likewise,

Even while he was negociating peace with England, he seized the dominion over Italy, deaf to British remonstrance, and indifferent to the consequences; and the very next day after peace had been signed, as if to insult her, he deprived the prince of Orange of all claim to the stadtholdership of Holland, sent

had compelled the Austrians to accept
a peace, the palace of the Luxembourg w
magnificently prepared for his reception

The minutest circumstances, observ
our author, will often develope the ruli
passion of the mind beyond greater occu
rences; and Buonaparte's conduct in t
Luxembourg evinced that an insatiable a
bition had habitually a predominant swa
When Buonaparte approached the spot,
elevated platform, upon which the directo
were seated, he was observed to ascend t
first step calmly; and then, in a hurri
manner, accompanied by an agitated loo
placed his foot suddenly upon the secon
reserved action seemed to say,
and as hastily withdrew it; and by th
This thro

I shall mount, but the time is not yet come pause, my aspiring thoughts for a time!"

The postscript contains a patriotic tr bute to Sir John Moore, and his army it concludes with observing, that

commissaries to all the principal sea-ports in Great Britain and Ireland, to learn, by every possible information, in what way the United Kingdom might be attacked to the best advantage; during the whole time of peace, continued to accuse and calumniate Great Britain, and endeavoured to dictate to its government in the way he was accustomed to conduct himself with haughtiness to the subdued nations on the continent, till her patience was exhausted, and she was compelled to go to war, to maintain her dignity and independence. This Buonaparte must have wished; that the odium of the measure, to those who did not know the aggression which England had received, might be removed from himself. He stript the Pope of his temporal dominions because he main tained peace, and would not join his forces to assist him in the destruction of mankind. He compelled Spain to enter into an offensive and defensive alliance with him; and by that means forced her into war contrary to her wishes and interests; and subsequently made The oppressor of the continent has no war against her himself, because she would fully seen what an English force can accou not receive a new Sovereign from his hands. plish, under the most unfavourable circun He carried war into Egypt, when the Porte stances, on foreign ground: he has felt was in profound peace with France: he kept strength again at Corunna, as he had befo peace with Portugal only to rob her by sub-experienced it in Egypt, at Maida, Vimier sidies, till he could safely attack her, and seize upon her dominions: he forced Russia to make war with England and Sweden; and he broke peace at different times with every part of the world where he could extend his armies in search of fresh plunder and new conquests and this is the man who talks of peace! "As for himself," (said the hypocrite Buonaparte, in a letter which he addressed to the arch-duke Charles at Vienna, and, from his whole conduct, it is hypocrisy in the extreme), "if the overture which he had the honour to make to him could save the life of a single man, he should pride himself more upon the civic crown, which his conscience would tell him he should have deserved, than upon the melancholy glory arising from military success." But the world is become too wise to be longer blinded by his

artifices.

After the numerous lives and expositions of the conduct of Buonaparte, which have, from time to time, appeared, very little, perhaps, in the shape of novelty, ought to be expected on the subject; but the work before us is not altogether without its claims in this respect; as will be seen from the following anecdote, which is related on the authority of an eyewitness. On the return of Buonaparte from that successful campaign, in which, by facing the bridge of Lodi, and achieving several other splendid victories, he

and on the ocean; and he can readily imagin what Great Britain could perform, were sh attacked on her native soil.

The spirit of her sons would rise M indignation, as that of one man-throug the whole circuit of the sister isles, there not an individual but would exclaim, wha ever were the number of the tyrant's horde "We would not die in that man's company

That fears his fellowship to die with us!" Buonaparte may aim at universal dominion but he must know and feel, THAT, TRUE T ITSELF, the British empire can never b

subdued!!!

Mr. Coxe, brother to the Archdeaco of Wilts, is we understand author of th Exposé. He relates the following aneo dote concerning the Bastille, of the vera city of which we have no doubt; as w knew a gentleman who had been confine in that place, and who had been liberate just before the revolution, who fre quently has related to us a similar account This person (the Marquis de P.) was s grateful for the accommodation and com fort he had received from the governor the Marquis de Launay, that being a Paris at the time of the attack of tha prison, and hearing of his arrest by the peuple souverain. he instantly flew to rescue and save him; and forcing his way through the crowd as they were conduct

« PreviousContinue »