 Whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury was a question of fact, also, to be determined by the jury, under proper instructions from the court.  Reports of Cases Determined in the Appellate Courts of Illinois - Page 405by Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, Basil Jones, James Christopher Cahill, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1912Full view - About this book
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 716 pages
...particular dangerous conditions there existing. Whether the failure of the mine examiner to mark the place was the proximate cause of the injury was a question of fact for the jury. The plaintiff had a right to rely upon the performance of the mine examiner's duty, and... | |
 | Law - 1885 - 544 pages
...Joy, Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SERVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 648 pages
...whether the circumstances exist which create such a duty: 111 US 228; 129 Mass. 364. The question of whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury should have been submitted to the jury: 94 US 469; 109 SC 122; LR 3 CP 216, 222, 591 ; LR 5 HL 45 ;... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1903 - 1112 pages
...case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The crucial question in this case is whether or not the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury of the plaintiff, so that, in the legal acceptation of that term, it contributed to her hurt. "Causo... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1913 - 1236 pages
...afterwards performed, and the suffering occasioned thereby, then and in that case I charge you that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury, for which jihiintiff seeks to recover damages." The court refused to give these requested instructions,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 1062 pages
...Joy, Wright & Hiulson, for appellee. SEEVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - Railroad law - 1885 - 732 pages
...Joy, Wright & Hudson,, for appellee. SEEVEES, J. — The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the... | |
 | Law - 1885 - 544 pages
...Joy, Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SEEVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 1150 pages
...from the defendant's negligent act Railroad Co. v. Salmon (Err. & App.) 39 NJ Law, 299. The question whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury was, in this case, one for the jury to determine, and an investigation of the evidence... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 1068 pages
...roads were constructed. As to whether the crossings are convenient and suitable is a question of fact to be determined by the Jury under proper instructions from the court. We see no error In the record, and the case la affirmed. (100 Шва. 792) PHNNINGTON т. RITCHIE. (No.... | |
| |
