Identifying Threats and Threatening Identities: The Social Construction of Realism and Liberalism
How does a state determine if another state is an important military or economic threat? The issue of threat perception drives a wide variety of behaviors, from allegiance formation and defense spending to trade relations and regime membership. While liberal theorists and realists both agree that threat perception is a cornerstone of international relations, there is widespread disagreement on the factors that contribute to our fear of other states. In particular, the field is deeply divided between those who believe material factors such as the balance of military power determine the perception of threat and those who believe ideational factors such as shared democratic value determine the perception of threat.
Using a variety of social scientific methods of investigation ranging from laboratory experiments and public opinion surveys to computer simulations and case studies, Rousseau challenges these conventional arguments and sheds new light on this debate. He presents a model of identity formation that can explain when ideas will (and will not) have a decisive impact on threat perception.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Identities and Threats
Identities and Threats in Realism and Liberalism
The Constructivist Challenge
The Construction of Threat Model
Experimental Analyses of Identity Construction
A Simulation of the Diffusion
A CrossNational Case Study
actors agents allows alter American analysis argues argument asked assumption attempt average balance become behavior beliefs chapter China Chinese claim classical collective communication complex construction constructivist cooperation defense democratic develop diffusion dimensions discussion domestic economic elite emergence empirical example experiments explain fact Figure Finally force foreign gains global human ideas impact important increases indicates individuals influence interaction interests issue Japan Japanese knowledge lead leaders less liberal major means military neighbor norms opinion organizations particular percent play political population predicts probability provides question realist relations relative repertoire response rise role salience Second shared identity shift significant similar simulation social society structure subjects survey Table theory Third threat perception tion trade United values variable Waltz Wendt