Page images
PDF
EPUB

JUDGES

OT TIIE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

DURING THE TIME OF TIIESE REPORTS.

JOHN PETTIT, LL. D.*
ALEXANDER C. DOWNEY, LL. D.
JAMES L. WORDEN, L.L. D.

SAMUEL H. BUSKIRK, LL. D.
*Chief Justice at the November Term, 1870.
+Chief Justice at the May Termn, 1871.

OFFICERS

OF THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE.

ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Hon. BAYLESS W. HANNA.

REPORTER,
JAMES B. BLACK.

CLERK
THEODORE W. M'COY.

SHERIFF,
JAMES P. WATSON.

LIBRARIAN,
JOHN GRAHAM.

TABLE OF THE

OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

A
Cheek v. The State.....

.492

Church et al. v, The Town of Anderson et al., McKee V.......... 17 Knightstown.

177 Andrews v. Spurlin et al.......... ..262 Cin. Rich. & Ft. W. R. R. Co. et

al., John V.........

-539 B

City of Columbus et al. v. Storey et al....

97 Barker v. Buell....

.297 City of Jeffersonville v. Ferryboat Bartholomew v. Langsdale............ 278 Shallcross et al..........

19 Baugh v. Boles...... -524 Clark, Menifee V........

• 304 Bishop, Adm'r, v. Welch........ -521 Clark, Turpin v......

-378 Bissell v. Wert..........

54 Columbus, City of, et al. v. Storey Bledsoe et al. v. Irvin........ .293 et al.......

97 Blizzard v. Phebus....... 284 Colter, ex parte.........

.109 Board of Com’rs Fountain Co. v. Colter v. Lower et al..

.285 Wood......... 70 Conover's Ex’rs, Hull v..

372 Board of Com’rs Lagrange Co. v. Cook, Jones et al. V........

.175 Newman..... 10 Coppin et al., Foist v...

.471 Board of Com’rs Putnam Co., Gil Covington, Town of, et al. v. Nel. • 344

....532 Boles, Baugh ..........

-524 Cox et al., Lang et al. V........... ..470 Bonsall v. The State....

.460 Cox v. Vickers et al..... Bowen et al. v. Wood...

more V............

son.......

27

.268 Crandall, The Jeff. M. & I. R. R. Boyd et al. v. Crary....... 363 Co, v......

43 Bradford, Evans et al. v... -527 Crary, Boyd et al. v..

.....563 Brooke et al. v. Filer et al........ 402 Cronkhite, White et al. V..............483 Brooker v. Hetzelgesser.. -537 Cuddington et al., Johnson V......... 43 Brown et al. v. Ellis....

•377 Cunningham v. The State, ex rel. Buchanan, The West. U. Tel. Co. V..429

Wilson ...

-373 Buell, Barker V........... ..........297 Burnham, Ex’r, çt al. v. Lasselle,

D Ex'r......

-425

Dallas et al., Smith et al. V... .255
C
Davis, Nelson et al. v..

.474 Davis v. The State....

.496 Carr, Adm'r, The I. B. & W. R. W. Deweese v. Cheek.......

514 -510 Dodds, Dritt v.....

63 Chcek, Deweese v.......

514 Dodds et al., Smith et ux. V........ ..452

Co. V......

[graphic]

.275 Hunt, Druly v.........

-507

Mather v. Scoles....
Matthias, Rapp et al. v........ -332

May et al., Hays et al. V....... ..427
I

Mayhew et al., Napier et al, v.......276
McCray et al. v. Lipp et al.....

116 Ind'polis, B. & W. R. W. Co. v. McFadden et al. v. Robison... 24 Carr, Adm'r....... -510 McKee v. Anderson et al...

17 Ind'polis, C. & L. R. R. Co.v. Rob. McNeely, Skillen V....... -383 inson. -380 McNeil, Dunlap V.......

-316 Ind'polis, C. & L. R R. Co. v. War- Menifee v. Clark....

-304 ner....

-515 Miller et ux., Newhouse v.... .463 Irvin, Bledsoe et al. V.............. ,293 Miller v. Remley.....

--539

I

1

...III

178

... 122

Milligan v. Poole et al...... 64

S Millner, Wallace v......

531 Moore et al. v. Jackson et al.... 360 Sawyer v. The State........... 80 Murphy et al. v. Henry et al..... 442 Sayer, The State, ex rel. Daugh

erty, V...

•379 N

Scoles, Mather V.........
Seeger v. Pfeifer.......

13 Sexton v. Sexton.....

88 Napier et al. v. Mayhew et al........276 Shaffer, Vinnedge et al. V............. 341 Nelson et al. v. Davis..................474 Shoemaker, Aud., et al., Howard Nelson, Town of Covington et al. v..532 et al. v.... Newhouse v. Miller et ux .463 Shumaker v. Johnson....

33 Newman, The Board of Comm'rs

Silvers, Porter et al. v..

.295 Lagrange Co. v...... 10 Simonds v. Hoover.......

.412 Nutt et al., Stafford et al. v........... 93 Sims et al. v. Rickets....

181 Nuttman, Lepper v.... -384 Sinker et al., Harvey v ...

341 Skillen v. McNeely.......

-383 O

Smith et al. v. Dallas et al............255

Smith et ux. v. Dodds et al..........452 Ohio & Miss. R. R. Co. v. Hays....173 Snyder v. Robinson et al......... ·311 Olt v. The State......

.365 Spurlin et al., Andrews V.......... .262

Stafford et al. v. Nutt et al.. 93
P
Stanley v. Manly...

.275 State, Bonsall v.......

.460 Partlow v. Haggarty ...

State, Cheek V........

•492 State, Davis V.......

496 Patterson, Ewing et al. V.... -326 State v. Echert

.283 Pea v. Pea........

387 State v. Elder et al... Perkins v. Rogers.....

·368 ..124 State, Jones V....... Pfeifer, Seeger v..

13 State v. Locke.....

419, 422 Phebus, Blizzard y

284
State, Ott v

•365 Pierce v. Goldsberry, --317 State, Quinn V...

.485 Pittsb's, Cin. & St. Louis R. R. Co.

State, Sawyer v...

80 v. Kain.....

.291 Poole et al., Milligan V......

State, Way V.......

..409 64 State, Whitney V.......... •503 Porter et al. v. Silvers......

-295 State, ex rel. Dougherty, v. Sayer... 379 Porter et al. v. Wilson et al....

State, ex rel. Wilson, CunningPrebster, Leach, Ex'r, v... .415

373 Princeton, Trustees of, v. Manck.... 51 State, ex rel. Wray, Kerr V...........

.288 Pyle, Stoneman v ...... ...103 Steam Ferryboat Shallcross et al.,

City of Jeffersonville v...

19 Q

Stoneman v. Pyle............. ...103

Storey et al., The City of Columbus Quinn y. The State.......... ...485 et al. y..........

97 Summers et al. v, Vaughan et al....323 R

T
Rapp et al. v. Matthias....
Reed et al., Richardson v... 356 Tefft v. Tefft .........
Remley, Miller V.......

-348

ham v.

· 332

44

-539 Town of Covington et al. v. NelRichardson v. Reed et al... .356

.........532 Rickets, Sims et al. V.....

181 Town of Knightstown, Church et Robinson et al., Snyder v....... .311

.177 Robinson, The Ind’polis C. & L. Trittipo v. Edwards.......

.467 R. R. Co. V........

.380 Trustees Town of Princeton v. Robison, McFadden et al. V......... 24 Manck .....

51 . Rogers, Perkins .....

.124 Turnbull et al. v. Ellis....

.........422 Ross et al., The Jeff. M. & I. R. R. Turpin v. Clark

.378 ..108 | Tutewiler et al., Johnson V...........353

son ......

al. v ....

Co. V..........

« PreviousContinue »