....426 | Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Bevin, 58 26 Ind. 443.....

.....

Smith v. Dodds, 35 Ind. 452
Smith v. Gugerty, 4 Barb. 614
Smith, in re, 10 Wend. 449....... 53
Smith v. Silvers, 32 Ind. 321........104
Smith v. Smith, 15 Ind. 315......... 63
Smith v. Smith, 23 Ind. 202.... ..446
Smith v. Smith, 2 Pick. 621 .466
Smith v. The State, 10 Ind. 106.....462
Snodgrass v. Hunt, 15 Ind. 274.....280 |
Sommers v. The Fire Ins. Co., 4 Am.

355

•382, 466

.381

..466

57

Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Fowler,
22 Ind. 316......
Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Goddard,
25 Ind. 185
Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Smith,
25 Ind. 288....
Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Thomas,
18 Ind. 215.......
Tomlinson v. Collett, 3 Blackf. 436..197
Toner v. Mitchell, 13 Ind. 530......329
Town of Petersborough v. Town of
Jeffrey, 6 N. H. 462........................................... 58
Town of Rochester v. Town of Ches-
ter, 3 N. H. 349.....

..466

Trippe v. Frazier, 4 Har. & Johns. 446

58

..222

.178 .397

131.......
Stancliff v. Palmeter, 18 Ind. 321...286
Stanton v. Woodcock, 19 Ind. 273...109 | Trustees of Town of Princeton v.
Stanwood v. Stanwood, 17 Mass. 57.192
State v. Bullard, 16 N. H. 139......501
State v. John, 8 Ired. 330.. 83
State v. Moore, 3 Dutcher, 105.487
State v. Prescott, 7 N. H. 287.......502
State v. Samuel, 3 Jones N. C. 74... 83
Steamboat Albatross v. Wayne, 16

Manck, 35 Ind. 51.....................................
Turner v. Cool, 23 Ind. 56.................
Turpin v. Remy, 3 Blackf. 210......287

U

Upton v. Adams' Ex'rs, 27 Ind. 432..392
U. S. v. Anderson, 9 Wal. 56........145
U. S. v. Grossmayer, 9 Wal. 72.....408
U. S. v. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610......156
U. S. v. 100 Barrels of Cement, 3

V

Ohio, 513......... 5S Stevens v. Parish, 29 Ind. 260....... 35 Stevenson v. Druley, 4 Ind. 519.....120 Stewart v. English, 6 Ind. 176......172 Stipes v. The State, 8 Ind. 280......367 Am. L. Reg. (N. S.) 430.....155 Stockett v. Holliday, 9 Md. 480.....190 | U. S. v. Weed, 5 Wal. 62.............153 Strader v. Mullane, 17 Ohio St. 624.. 59 Sturges v. Burton, 8 Ohio St. 215...141 Snydam v. The Grand Street, &c., R. R. Co., 41 Barb. 375.466 Vandagrift v. Tate, 4 Blackf. 174...373 Valentine v. Jackson, 9 Wend. 302.454 Swails v. Butcher, 2 Ind. 84. 59 Vandine v. Burpee, 3 Met. 288...... 58 Sweeney v. Sampson, 5 Ind. 465....255 Van Hook v. Whitlock, 7 Paige, 375 ......... 141 Van Rensselaer v. Kearney, 11 How. 297

T

Taylor v. Fletcher, 15 Ind. 80..109, 28-4
Taylor v. Moffatt, 2 Blackf. 305.....287
Teaff v. Hewitt, 1 Ohio St. 511.....391
Tebbitts v. Haskins, 16 Me. 283..... 58
Tenbrook v. Brown, 17 Ind. 410....350
Texas v. White, 7 Wal. 726.... ..163
The F. E. Soc. v. Mather, 15 Conn.
587
...192
Thom v. Wilson's Ex'r, 24 Ind. 323-393
Thomas v. Harvie's Heirs, 10 Wheat.
146
.......141
Thompson v. Norton, 14 Ind. 187.. 70
Thompson v. Thompson, 9 Ind. 323 8
Thompson's Ex'rs v. Norris, 5 C. E.
Green, 489...........

37

Venice, The, 2 Wal. 258......148 to 153
Venus, The, 8 Cranch, 253.160
Vidal v. Girard's Ex'rs, 2 How. 27
230 to 245

W

Walker v. The State, 23 Ind. 61.....421 Wallingford v. Allen, 10 Pet. 583...187 Walter v. Hodge, 2 Swanst. 97......192 Wann v. The West. Un. Tel. Co., 37 Mo. 472 ....438 Ward v. Crotly, 4 Met. Ky. 59......192 Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199...145 Wasson v. Canfield, 6 Blackf. 406...287 Watt v. Alvord, 25 Ind. 533.........518 Webb v. Baird, 6 Ind. 13............. 72 Webb v. Deitch, 17 Ind. 521 ..................... ..324 .436 | Webster v. Parker, 7 Ind. 185.......291

Gavin & Hord's Statutes of Indiana cited as 1, 2 G. & H.

Statutes of Indiana, Vol. 3 (Davis' Supplement), cited as 3 Ind. Stat.

For previous decisions of the Supreme Court of this State,

overruled, see INDEX, tit. CASES OVERRULED.

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF INDIANA,

AT INDIANAPOLIS, NOVEMBER TERM, 1870, IN THE FIFTY-FIFTH
YEAR OF THE STATE.

MATHER V. SCOLES.

DEMAND.-Where there is a contract to execute a conveyance of real estate, and no time is fixed for the delivery of the conveyance, a demand before suit is instituted is necessary. In such a case the complaint must allege a demand. SAME.-Conveyance of Real Estate.-In general, an action cannot be maintained upon an agreement to convey real estate until after a conveyance has been demanded.

STATUTE OF FRAUDS.-The statute of frauds does not make a contract void, but
simply withholds the remedy for its enforcement.

SAME.-Verbal Contract to Convey Real Estate.-A complaint upon a verbal
agreement to convey real estate, not showing part performance, or that the
defendant fraudulently refused to reduce the contract to writing, is bad.
SAME.-Part Performance.-Payment of purchase-money is not such a part
performance as will take a case out of the statute of frauds.

SAME.-Alternative Contract.-A parol agreement in the alternative, to convey
land, or, in case of failure to convey, to pay a certain sum of money, is within
the statute of frauds, and no action, either to compel a performance, or to re-
cover money, can be maintained upon it.

CONSIDERATION.-Either party to a deed may show, except for the purpose of defeating its operation, the true consideration, although it be entirely different from that expressed in the deed.

VOL. XXXV.-I

35

138 111

139 678

35 1 153 402