...426 | Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Bevin, Smith, in re, 10 Wend. 449.......... Smith v. Silvers, 32 Ind. 321104 Smith v. Smith, 15 Ind. 315...... 63 Smith v. Smith, 23 Ind. 202...... 446 Smith v. Smith, 2 Pick. 621 .466 Smith v. The State, 10 Ind. 106.....462 Snodgrass v. Hunt, 15 Ind. 274.....280 Sommers v. The Fire Ins. Co., 4 Am. Sorden v. Gatewood, I Ind. 107... Sparks v. The State Bank, 7 Blackf. Stancliff v. Palmeter, 18 Ind. 321...286 Stanton v. Woodcock, 19 Ind. 273...109 Stanwood v. Stanwood, 17 Mass. 57.192 State v. Moore, 3 Dutcher, 105......487 State v. Prescott, 7 N. H. 287.......502 Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Fowler, Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Goddard, Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Smith, Toledo, &c., R. W. Co. v. Thomas, Tomlinson v. Collett, 3 Blackf. 436..197 Toner v. Mitchell, 13 Ind. 530......329 Town of Petersborough v. Town of Town of Rochester v. Town of Ches- Trustees of Town of Princeton v. Upton v. Adams' Ex'rs, 27 Ind. 432..392 Taylor v. Fletcher, 15 Ind. 80..109, 284 Taylor v. Moffatt, 2 Blackf. 305.....287 Teaff v. Hewitt, 1 Ohio St. 511391 Tebbitts v. Haskins, 16 Me. 283..... 58 Tenbrook v. Brown, 17 Ind. 410....350 Texas v. White, 7 Wal. 726.........163 The F. E. Soc. v. Mather, 15 Conn. Thom v. Wilson's Ex'r, 24 Ind. 323-393 Thomas v. Harvie's Heirs, 10 Wheat. Thompson v. Norton, 14 Ind. 187.. Thompson v. Thompson, 9 Ind. 323 Am. L. Reg. (N. S.) 430....................... .155 Walker v. The State, 23 Ind. 61.....421 472 .....436 | Webster v. Parker, 7 Ind. 185.......291 West. Un. Tel. Co. v. Carew, 15 ........439 57 Iowa, 148... Whitten v. Whitten, 3 Cush. 191 ... 189 Whittlesey v. Beall, 5 Blackf. 143...274 Whittlesey v. McMahon, 10 Conn. 137. ..192 Wight v. Shaw, 5 Cush. 56........... 36 Wightman v. Wightman, 4 Johns. 49 .222 16, 286 Williams v. Morgan, 15 Q. B. 782-397 Met. 306........ 260 391 Winton v. Barnum, 19 Conn. 171...192 Wisner v. Barnet, 4 Wash. C. C. 631.141 Wolcott v. Yeager, 11 Ind. 84.....-359 Wonderly v. Nokes, 8 Blackf. 589... 59 Wood v. Long, 28 Ind. 314........ Wood v. Mansell, 3 Blackf. 125..... 43 Wood v. Warden, 20 Ohio, 518.....192 Woodbeck v. Keller, 6 Cow. 118.... 59 Woodruffy.Dobbins, 7 Blackf. 582.5 : 5 Woodward v. Wilcox, 27 Ind. 207.469 Worthington v. Hylyer, 4 Mass. 196.203 Wright v. Harris, 29 Ind. 438........ 72 Wright v. The Ind'polis, &c., R. R. .382 Co., 18 Ind. 168... Wright v. Trustees M. E. Church, Hoff. 202.... ...246 Gavin & Hord's Statutes of Indiana cited as 1, 2 G. & H. Statutes of Indiana, Vol. 3 (Davis' Supplement), cited as 3 Ind. Stat. For previous decisions of the Supreme Court of this State, overruled, see INDEX, tit. CASES OVERRULED. CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, AT INDIANAPOLIS, NOVEMBER TERM, 1870, IN THE FIFTY-FIFTH MATHER V. SCOLES. DEMAND.-Where there is a contract to execute a conveyance of real estate, and no time is fixed for the delivery of the conveyance, a demand before suit is instituted is necessary. In such a case the complaint must allege a demand. SAME.-Conveyance of Real Estate.-In general, an action cannot be maintained upon an agreement to convey real estate until after a conveyance has been demanded. STATUTE OF FRAUDS.-The statute of frauds does not make a contract void, but SAME.-Verbal Contract to Convey Real Estate.-A complaint upon a verbal SAME.-Alternative Contract.-A parol agreement in the alternative, to convey CONSIDERATION.-Either party to a deed may show, except for the purpose of defeating its operation, the true consideration, although it be entirely different from that expressed in the deed. VOL. XXXV.-I 35 138 111 139 678 35 1 153 402 |
Get this book in print