Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 7; Volume 32Published for John Conrad and Company, 1854 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... ground , it may be proper to remark , that the re- jection of the claim of the defendant by the treasury department , formed no objection to the admission of it by the court , as evidence of offset to the jury . Had the claim never been ...
... ground , it may be proper to remark , that the re- jection of the claim of the defendant by the treasury department , formed no objection to the admission of it by the court , as evidence of offset to the jury . Had the claim never been ...
Page 8
... ground , it may be proper to remark , that the re- jection of the claim of the defendant by the treasury department , formed no objection to the admission of it by the court , as evidence of offset to the jury . Had the claim never been ...
... ground , it may be proper to remark , that the re- jection of the claim of the defendant by the treasury department , formed no objection to the admission of it by the court , as evidence of offset to the jury . Had the claim never been ...
Page 14
... ground that no other compensation could be allowed to him than such as was mentioned or defined by the laws of the United States , by instructions of the president , or by the legal regulations of the war department . It is presumed ...
... ground that no other compensation could be allowed to him than such as was mentioned or defined by the laws of the United States , by instructions of the president , or by the legal regulations of the war department . It is presumed ...
Page 16
... ground that no other or farther compensation could be allowed for disburse- ments made , or extra services rendered , as aforesaid , than such as were sanctioned or defined by the laws of the United States , by in- structions of the ...
... ground that no other or farther compensation could be allowed for disburse- ments made , or extra services rendered , as aforesaid , than such as were sanctioned or defined by the laws of the United States , by in- structions of the ...
Page 17
... ground of there being an equity in favour of the claims , allow them . As to the words equitable set - off in the third section of the act , it was argued that it could not have been the intention of the legisla- ture to authorize a set ...
... ground of there being an equity in favour of the claims , allow them . As to the words equitable set - off in the third section of the act , it was argued that it could not have been the intention of the legisla- ture to authorize a set ...
Contents
240 | |
321 | |
322 | |
335 | |
347 | |
411 | |
421 | |
435 | |
127 | |
163 | |
165 | |
180 | |
187 | |
205 | |
213 | |
217 | |
443 | |
452 | |
465 | |
467 | |
471 | |
472 | |
485 | |
487 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres act of congress admitted aforesaid alleged allowed amended appear assigned authority Breckenridge cause certified charge circuit court claim commissioners common law compensation complainants constitution contract conveyance counsel creditors creek debt decree deed defendant disbursements district court duties endorsement entitled entry equity evidence Ex parte Bradstreet Ex parte Watkins executed fact favour filed Fillebrown Florida fraud given grant heirs Holmes hundred Ibid invention issued John Nicholson judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury land legislature Lessee of Livingston libel lien Louisiana Lunt's Administrator marriage ment navy notice objection opinion Orleans parties patent Patton's payment Pennsylvania Percheman person plaintiff in error pleaded possession principle proceedings provisions purchaser question record rule Sampeyreac settled settlement statute sugars suit supreme court survey Thompson thousand dollars tion trial United usury valid Vattier Voss Wheat William Carson writ of error writ of right
Popular passages
Page 183 - The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual States. Each State established a Constitution for itself, and, in that Constitution, provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated.
Page 219 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Page 62 - His Catholic Majesty cedes to the United States, in full property and sovereignty, all the territories which belong to him, situated to the eastward of the Mississippi, known by the name of East and West Florida.
Page 97 - Treasurer thereof, promising the payment of money to any person or persons, his, her or their order, or to bearer...
Page 73 - This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel: on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby...
Page 63 - States, shall be ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession of the lands, to the same extent that the same grants would be valid if the territories had remained under the dominion of his catholic majesty.
Page 232 - ... that every patent which shall be obtained pursuant to this act, for any invention, art, or discovery, which it shall afterwards appear had been known or used previous to such application for a patent, shall be utterly void.
Page 62 - ... property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled. The people change their allegiance, their relation to their ancient sovereign is dissolved, but their relations to each other, and their rights of property, remain undisturbed. If this be the modern rule even in cases of conquest, who can doubt its application to the case of an amicable cession of territory?
Page 62 - A cession of territory is never understood to be a cession of the property belonging to its inhabitants. The king cedes that only which belonged to him. Lands he had previously granted were not his to cede.