Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 7; Volume 32Published for John Conrad and Company, 1854 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... given to the law by the secretary of the navy . It will not be contended that one secretary of a department has not the same power as another to give a construction to an act which relates to the business of his department . A practical ...
... given to the law by the secretary of the navy . It will not be contended that one secretary of a department has not the same power as another to give a construction to an act which relates to the business of his department . A practical ...
Page 10
... given , those duties were required to be performed by the commander of the navy yard , who continued to discharge them , until an agent was appointed under the act of the last session . Until this time , the act of 1804 seems never to ...
... given , those duties were required to be performed by the commander of the navy yard , who continued to discharge them , until an agent was appointed under the act of the last session . Until this time , the act of 1804 seems never to ...
Page 12
... given to them by the navy and treasury departments , its justice is unquestionable . The government does not deny the performance of the services by the defendant , nor that they do in equity entitle him to compensation ; but , as his ...
... given to them by the navy and treasury departments , its justice is unquestionable . The government does not deny the performance of the services by the defendant , nor that they do in equity entitle him to compensation ; but , as his ...
Page 16
... term " justly , " which is found in the fourth section of the act , was not intended to enlarge the powers of the court and jury beyond that given to the accounting officers . [ United States v . Ripley . ] It is 16 20 SUPREME COURT .
... term " justly , " which is found in the fourth section of the act , was not intended to enlarge the powers of the court and jury beyond that given to the accounting officers . [ United States v . Ripley . ] It is 16 20 SUPREME COURT .
Page 20
... given without qualification , the judgment must be reversed , and the cause remanded for proceedings de novo . This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the eastern ...
... given without qualification , the judgment must be reversed , and the cause remanded for proceedings de novo . This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the eastern ...
Contents
240 | |
321 | |
322 | |
335 | |
347 | |
411 | |
421 | |
435 | |
127 | |
163 | |
165 | |
180 | |
187 | |
205 | |
213 | |
217 | |
443 | |
452 | |
465 | |
467 | |
471 | |
472 | |
485 | |
487 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres act of congress admitted aforesaid alleged allowed amended appear assigned authority Breckenridge cause certified charge circuit court claim commissioners common law compensation complainants constitution contract conveyance counsel creditors creek debt decree deed defendant disbursements district court duties endorsement entitled entry equity evidence Ex parte Bradstreet Ex parte Watkins executed fact favour filed Fillebrown Florida fraud given grant heirs Holmes hundred Ibid invention issued John Nicholson judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury land legislature Lessee of Livingston libel lien Louisiana Lunt's Administrator marriage ment navy notice objection opinion Orleans parties patent Patton's payment Pennsylvania Percheman person plaintiff in error pleaded possession principle proceedings provisions purchaser question record rule Sampeyreac settled settlement statute sugars suit supreme court survey Thompson thousand dollars tion trial United usury valid Vattier Voss Wheat William Carson writ of error writ of right
Popular passages
Page 183 - The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual States. Each State established a Constitution for itself, and, in that Constitution, provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated.
Page 219 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Page 62 - His Catholic Majesty cedes to the United States, in full property and sovereignty, all the territories which belong to him, situated to the eastward of the Mississippi, known by the name of East and West Florida.
Page 97 - Treasurer thereof, promising the payment of money to any person or persons, his, her or their order, or to bearer...
Page 73 - This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel: on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby...
Page 63 - States, shall be ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession of the lands, to the same extent that the same grants would be valid if the territories had remained under the dominion of his catholic majesty.
Page 232 - ... that every patent which shall be obtained pursuant to this act, for any invention, art, or discovery, which it shall afterwards appear had been known or used previous to such application for a patent, shall be utterly void.
Page 62 - ... property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled. The people change their allegiance, their relation to their ancient sovereign is dissolved, but their relations to each other, and their rights of property, remain undisturbed. If this be the modern rule even in cases of conquest, who can doubt its application to the case of an amicable cession of territory?
Page 62 - A cession of territory is never understood to be a cession of the property belonging to its inhabitants. The king cedes that only which belonged to him. Lands he had previously granted were not his to cede.