Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 7; Volume 32Published for John Conrad and Company, 1854 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... considered as equitable . This court will not sanction a limitation of the power of the circuit court , in cases of this kind , to the admission of evidence to the jury on a trial , only to such items of offset against the claims of the ...
... considered as equitable . This court will not sanction a limitation of the power of the circuit court , in cases of this kind , to the admission of evidence to the jury on a trial , only to such items of offset against the claims of the ...
Page 2
... considered by congress as coming within the ordinary duties of an agent for the navy yard at Washington , under the act of 1804. But independent of this consideration , it is enough to know that the duties in question were discharged by ...
... considered by congress as coming within the ordinary duties of an agent for the navy yard at Washington , under the act of 1804. But independent of this consideration , it is enough to know that the duties in question were discharged by ...
Page 5
... considered to be equitable . On the part of the government , it is contended that , in a case like the present , the court , in admitting evidence of offset against the claim of the government , is limited , not only to * such items as ...
... considered to be equitable . On the part of the government , it is contended that , in a case like the present , the court , in admitting evidence of offset against the claim of the government , is limited , not only to * such items as ...
Page 9
... considered to be equitable . On the part of the government , it is contended that , in a case like the present , the court , in admitting evidence of offset against the claim of the government , is limited , not only to such items as ...
... considered to be equitable . On the part of the government , it is contended that , in a case like the present , the court , in admitting evidence of offset against the claim of the government , is limited , not only to such items as ...
Page 11
... considered binding on past transactions . That the duties in question were discharged by the defendant during office hours , can form no objection to the compensation claimed . They were required of him by the head of the depart- ment ...
... considered binding on past transactions . That the duties in question were discharged by the defendant during office hours , can form no objection to the compensation claimed . They were required of him by the head of the depart- ment ...
Contents
240 | |
321 | |
322 | |
335 | |
347 | |
411 | |
421 | |
435 | |
127 | |
163 | |
165 | |
180 | |
187 | |
205 | |
213 | |
217 | |
443 | |
452 | |
465 | |
467 | |
471 | |
472 | |
485 | |
487 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres act of congress admitted aforesaid alleged allowed amended appear assigned authority Breckenridge cause certified charge circuit court claim commissioners common law compensation complainants constitution contract conveyance counsel creditors creek debt decree deed defendant disbursements district court duties endorsement entitled entry equity evidence Ex parte Bradstreet Ex parte Watkins executed fact favour filed Fillebrown Florida fraud given grant heirs Holmes hundred Ibid invention issued John Nicholson judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury land legislature Lessee of Livingston libel lien Louisiana Lunt's Administrator marriage ment navy notice objection opinion Orleans parties patent Patton's payment Pennsylvania Percheman person plaintiff in error pleaded possession principle proceedings provisions purchaser question record rule Sampeyreac settled settlement statute sugars suit supreme court survey Thompson thousand dollars tion trial United usury valid Vattier Voss Wheat William Carson writ of error writ of right
Popular passages
Page 183 - The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual States. Each State established a Constitution for itself, and, in that Constitution, provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated.
Page 219 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Page 62 - His Catholic Majesty cedes to the United States, in full property and sovereignty, all the territories which belong to him, situated to the eastward of the Mississippi, known by the name of East and West Florida.
Page 97 - Treasurer thereof, promising the payment of money to any person or persons, his, her or their order, or to bearer...
Page 73 - This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel: on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby...
Page 63 - States, shall be ratified and confirmed to the persons in possession of the lands, to the same extent that the same grants would be valid if the territories had remained under the dominion of his catholic majesty.
Page 232 - ... that every patent which shall be obtained pursuant to this act, for any invention, art, or discovery, which it shall afterwards appear had been known or used previous to such application for a patent, shall be utterly void.
Page 62 - ... property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled. The people change their allegiance, their relation to their ancient sovereign is dissolved, but their relations to each other, and their rights of property, remain undisturbed. If this be the modern rule even in cases of conquest, who can doubt its application to the case of an amicable cession of territory?
Page 62 - A cession of territory is never understood to be a cession of the property belonging to its inhabitants. The king cedes that only which belonged to him. Lands he had previously granted were not his to cede.