Reports of Civil and Criminal Cases Decided by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1785-1951, Volume 4; Volume 61 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 79
Page 7
... of this question , because , if for no other reason , there was no proof in those cases of any statute in Louisiana upon the subject under con- sideration . Lee , Ivy & Co. vs. Buford . This case SUMMER TERM , 1862 . 7.
... of this question , because , if for no other reason , there was no proof in those cases of any statute in Louisiana upon the subject under con- sideration . Lee , Ivy & Co. vs. Buford . This case SUMMER TERM , 1862 . 7.
Page 8
... reasons urged to prove that , under said statute , a notary cannot base a certificate of protest upon a presentment by his deputy , apply with equal force , to prove that he cannot base a certificate of notice of protest , upon a ...
... reasons urged to prove that , under said statute , a notary cannot base a certificate of protest upon a presentment by his deputy , apply with equal force , to prove that he cannot base a certificate of notice of protest , upon a ...
Page 9
... reason of the insured having kept prohibited articles in the house , a promise by the insurer's agent , hav- ing authority to adjust and pay losses , with knowledge that the prohibited articles were kept in the house at the time of the ...
... reason of the insured having kept prohibited articles in the house , a promise by the insurer's agent , hav- ing authority to adjust and pay losses , with knowledge that the prohibited articles were kept in the house at the time of the ...
Page 13
... reason of the plaintiffs having kept prohibited articles in the house , yet , if the defendant's agent , having ... reasons : First . Authority to the agent to ad- just and pay losses , would not give him a right to pay out the money of ...
... reason of the plaintiffs having kept prohibited articles in the house , yet , if the defendant's agent , having ... reasons : First . Authority to the agent to ad- just and pay losses , would not give him a right to pay out the money of ...
Page 14
... reason . 3. It is contended that the policy was void because J. B. Lawrence & Co. did not own said storehouse , and that the court below erred in refusing so to instruct the jury . Whether or not the insurance upon the house was void ...
... reason . 3. It is contended that the policy was void because J. B. Lawrence & Co. did not own said storehouse , and that the court below erred in refusing so to instruct the jury . Whether or not the insurance upon the house was void ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres ademption Adm'r affidavit alleged amend amount answer appellant appellee attachment authority aver Barbaroux Bardstown Bibb bill bill of attainder bond cause of action cause remanded chap CIRCUIT COURT cited Civil Code citizen claim Commonwealth confiscation consideration constitution constructive notice contended contract conveyance court of equity creditors Dana debts declares deed defendant DELIVERED THE OPINION demands devise Doniphan entitled equity evidence executed executor facts filed forfeiture heirs held husband indorser intention J. J. Mar JAMES HARLAN JUDGE BULLITT DELIVERED judgment is reversed jury land liable Liberia lien ment mortgage Norris notice paid parties payment person petition plaintiff pleadings proceedings proved provisions purchaser question real estate reason rendered Revised Statutes rule Sechrest sheriff slaves sold Stat sued suit supra sureties sustained testator thereof tion trial trustee United United States constitution usury Vallette void wife
Popular passages
Page 203 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted.
Page 381 - Also to the ninth and tenth sections of an act entitled "An act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, and for other purposes," approved July 17, 1862, and which sections are in the words and figures following: "SEC.
Page 204 - ... when the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the 'court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.
Page 386 - The mitigations of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern times has introduced into practice, will more or less affect the exercise of this right, but cannot impair the right itself.
Page 379 - An Act to Suppress Insurrection, to Punish Treason and Rebellion, to Seize and Confiscate the Property of Rebels, and for other purposes...
Page 4 - State, with any deadly weapon, either in or out of the State, shall be deprived of the right to hold any office of honor or profit in this Commonwealth...
Page 341 - The court may, before, or after judgment, in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any pleading, process, or proceeding, by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect...
Page 290 - Whatever belongs merely to the remedy may be altered according to the will of the State, provided the alteration does not impair the obligation of the contract. But if that effect is produced, it is immaterial whether it is done by acting on the remedy or directly on the contract itself. In either case it is prohibited by the constitution.
Page 430 - The first arising from the rule prescribed by the law of nations; . . . when the United States declared their independence, they were bound to receive the law of nations, in its modern state of purity and refinement..
Page 406 - IT is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money, of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.