Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia: (general Term,) at the April and September Terms of 1873 [to the September Term, 1879, Inclusive], Volume 9W.H. & O.H. Morrison, 1877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 92
Page 4
... decision . The appellant insists that the reference to the Castleman and North mortgage was not only notice to the purchaser of the amount due them , but that the reference to it made it a part of the contract , and it is to be read ...
... decision . The appellant insists that the reference to the Castleman and North mortgage was not only notice to the purchaser of the amount due them , but that the reference to it made it a part of the contract , and it is to be read ...
Page 24
... decision of such primary examiner to the board of examiners - in - chief . II . A writ of mandamus will not be allowed against the Commissioner of Patents , where the law submits the subject to his opinion . - Cartter , Ch . J. III ...
... decision of such primary examiner to the board of examiners - in - chief . II . A writ of mandamus will not be allowed against the Commissioner of Patents , where the law submits the subject to his opinion . - Cartter , Ch . J. III ...
Page 25
... decision was made in July , 1874. From this decision Bigelow took an appeal to the examiners - in - chief , who , in October following , confirmed the decision of the primary examiner , by awarding priority of invention to the said Bald ...
... decision was made in July , 1874. From this decision Bigelow took an appeal to the examiners - in - chief , who , in October following , confirmed the decision of the primary examiner , by awarding priority of invention to the said Bald ...
Page 26
... decision of the examiner to the examiners - in - chief , which appeal the Commissioner of Patents refused to allow or entertain , and he now asks the court to compel the Commissioner to allow him such an appeal . The relator sets forth ...
... decision of the examiner to the examiners - in - chief , which appeal the Commissioner of Patents refused to allow or entertain , and he now asks the court to compel the Commissioner to allow him such an appeal . The relator sets forth ...
Page 27
... decision of the latter was a decision in an interference case , and the law is explicit that in the matter of interference either party may appeal from the decision ; and we ask that the Commissioner shall be compelled to allow our ...
... decision of the latter was a decision in an interference case , and the law is explicit that in the matter of interference either party may appeal from the decision ; and we ask that the Commissioner shall be compelled to allow our ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreed agreement alleged allowed amount appeal application assignment authority bank bill bond cause certificate charge claim collected Commissioner Company complainant consideration contract conveyed court debt decision decree deed deed of trust defendant delivered directed duty effect entitled equity et al evidence examiner exceptions executed expressed fact favor filed fraud further give given grant ground held interest issue John judgment jury Justice land lien matter ment notice object opinion paid parties passed patent payment perform plaintiff possession premises present proceedings proceeds proper purchase question Railroad real estate reason received record referred refused regard rents respect rule says sold STATEMENT statute street suit taken term testimony tion train trial trust United Washington witness writ
Popular passages
Page 407 - THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , in the year One thousand, nine hundred and , between of , the party of the first part...
Page 300 - ... and acquiesced for a great length of time. Nothing can call forth this court into activity but conscience, good faith and reasonable diligence.
Page 106 - Whenever a patent on application is refused, either by the commissioner of patents or by the supreme court of the district of Columbia upon appeal from the commissioner, the applicant may have remedy by bill In equity; and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had...
Page 376 - ... setting forth his place of residence, his inability to pay all his debts in full, his willingness to surrender all his estate and effects for the benefit of his creditors...
Page 152 - And the thing invented or produced, for which a patent is given, is that which gives a peculiar or distinctive appearance to the manufacture, or article to which it may be applied, or to which it gives form. The law manifestly contemplates that giving certain new and original appearances to a manufactured article may enhance its salable value, may enlarge the demand for it, and may be a meritorious service to the public.
Page 511 - ... hereafter created against the State under any agreement or contract made without express authority of law; and all such unauthorized agreements or contracts shall be null and void: Provided, the General Assembly may make appropriations for expenditures incurred in suppressing insurrection or repelling invasion.
Page 395 - The High Contracting Parties hereby engage to consider the decision of the Commissioners as absolutely final and conclusive upon each claim decided upon by them, and to give full effect to such decisions without any objection, evasion, or delay whatsoever.
Page 547 - If there be no express promise, but a promise is to be raised by implication of law from the acknowledgment of the party, such acknowledgment ought to contain an unqualified and direct admission of a previous, subsisting debt, which the party is liable and willing to pay. If there be accompanying circumstances, which repel the presumption of a promise or intention to pay; if the expressions be equivocal, vague, and indeterminate, leading to no certain conclusion, but at best to probable inferences,...
Page 26 - Whenever an application is made for a patent which. in the opinion of the commissioner, would interfere with any pending application...
Page 46 - When carriers undertake to convey persons by the powerful but dangerous agency of steam, public policy and safety require that they be held to the greatest possible care and diligence. And whether the consideration for such transportation be pecuniary or otherwise, the personal safety of the passengers should not be left to the sport of chance or the negligence of careless agents. Any negligence, in such cases, may well deserve the epithet of 'gross.