Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

of the winds and waves. He would repeal all our discriminating duties and drawbacks, that the merchants should be hereafter precisely on the same footing as foreign merchants.

The question was then taken on Mr. Cook's motion and negatived, 50 to 45.

Mr. MARION moved to amend the bill by striking out the fourth day of March, and inserting the fifteenth day of March, as the day on which the partial repeal of the embargo should take date, and thus to place all the ports in the Union on an equality-negatived by 56 to 45.

The bill was then read through.

Mr. D. R. WILLIAMS inquired whether the bill extending credit on revenue bonds, the continuance of which depends on the continuance of the embargo, would be continued after the passage of this law.

Mr. NICHOLAS said he could only state his individual opinion that it would be still in force.

Mr. D. R. WILLIAMS asked whether it had been considered expedient by the Committee on Foreign Relations that that bill should continue in force hereafter?

Mr. NICHOLAS replied that the committee had not had the subject under consideration. The Committee then rose and reported the bill as amended.

Mr. W. ALSTON hoped that the House would not now consider the report, but take up the appropriation bill for the navy.

The House agreed, however, now to consider the report-yeas 60.

The amendment made in the Committee, by striking out all that part of the bill relating to let ters of marque and reprisal, being read, was concurred in yeas 74, nays 33, as follows:

YEAS-Evan Alexander, Willis Alston, jr., Ezekiel Bacon, Joseph Barker, William W. Bibb, William Blackledge, John Blake, jr., Thomas Blount, Adam Boyd, William Butler, Epaphroditus Champion, Orchard Cook, John Culpeper, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, jun., Daniel M. Durell, James Elliot, William Ely, John W. Eppes, William Findley, Meshack Franklin, James M. Garnett, Thomas Gholson, jun., Peterson Goodwyn, John Harris, William Helms, Reuben Humphreys, Daniel Ilsley, Richard Jackson, Walter Jones, James Kelly, Thomas Kenan, John Lambert, Joseph Lewis, jun., Edward St. Loe Livermore, Edward Lloyd, Matthew Lyon, Nathaniel Macon, Robert Marion, Josiah Masters, William Milnor, John Morrow, Jonathan O. Mosely, Gurdon S. Mumford, Thomas Newbold, John Pugh, Josiah Quincy, John Randolph, Samuel Riker, John Rowan, James Sloan, Jedediah K. Smith, Samuel Smith, Henry Southard, Richard Stanford, William Stedman, Clement Storer, Lewis B. Sturges, Peter Swart, Samuel Taggart, Benjamin Tallmadge, John Thompson, Jabez Upham, James I. Van Alen, Philip Van Cortlandt, Nicholas Van Dyke, Archibald Van Horn, Killian K. Van Rensselaer, Daniel C. Verplanck, Robert Whitehill, Isaac Wilbour, David R. Williams, Marmaduke Williams, and Nathan Wilson.

NAYS-David Bard, Burwell Bassett, John Boyle, Robert Brown, Joseph Calhoun, Matthew Clay, Richard Cutts, Josiah Deane, Joseph Desha, James Fisk, Isaiah L. Green, James Holland, David Holmes,

H. OF R.

Richard M. Johnson, John Love, William McCreery, John Montgomery, Nicholas R. Moore, Thomas Moore, Thomas Newton, Wilson C. Nicholas, John Porter, John Rea of Pennsylvania, John Rhea of Tennessee, Jacob Richards, Matthias Richards, Benjamin Say, Ebenezer Seaver, John Smilie, John Smith, John

Taylor, Alexander Wilson, and Richard Winn.

Mr. GHOLSON moved to strike out the fourth day of March and insert the twentieth of May, as the time at which the partial repeal of the embargo should take date. He said he had taken this day in preference to the first day of June, which he had before moved, because it would give an indubitable pledge to the people that the repeal should take place, by fixing on a period anterior to the convocation of the next Congress for the commencement of the operation of the law. If the non-intercourse system was to be a substitute for the embargo, why should there be an interval from the fourth of March till the twentieth of May? It was a recession for such a time from our ground, without any interposing measure. He called upon gentlemen to show to him that it was not receding, that it was not submission.

Mr. LYON said, that the nation was tired enough of the embargo, and he hoped that they would not continue it any longer.

Mr. Boyd rose to observe to those within his

hearing, that he was not willing to submit to the dictates of Great Britain or France, nor of any gentleman on the floor, and that he despised denunciations, come whence they would.

Mr. MACON moved to strike out all that part of the bill relating to the repeal of the embargo, which motion superseded that of Mr. GHOLSON.

The question was then taken on Mr. MACON's motion and decided in the affirmative-yeas 33, nays 82, as follows:

YEAS-David Bard, Burwell Bassett, William W. Bibb, William Blackledge, Thomas Blount, John Boyle, Joseph Calhoun, Matthew Clay, Josiah Deane, Joseph Desha, Meshack Franklin, James Holland, David Holmes, Benjamin Howard, John G. Jackson, Richard M. Johnson, Thomas Kenan, Nathaniel Macon, Robert Marion, John Montgomery, Thomas Newbold, John Porter, John Rea of Pennsylvania, Jacob Richards, Benjamin Say, John Smilie, Richard Stanford, John Taylor, George M. Troup, Daniel C. Verplanck, Robert Whitehill, David R. Williams, and Richard Winn.

NAYS-Evan Alexander, Willis Alston, jun., Ezekiel Bacon, Joseph Barker, John Blake, jun., Adam Boyd, Robert Brown, William Butler, Epaphroditus Champion, Martin Chittenden, Orchard Cook, John Culpeper, Richard Cut, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, jun., Daniel M. Durell, James Elliot, William Ely, John W. Eppes, William Findley, James Fisk, Barent Gardenier, Francis Gardner, James M. Garnett, Thomas Gholson, jun., Peterson Goodwyn, Isaiah L. Green, John Harris, John Heister, William Helms, William Hoge, Reuben Humphreys, Daniel Ilsley, Richard Jackson, Robert Jenkins, Walter Jones, James Kelly, John Lambert, Joseph Lewis, jr., Edward St. Loe Livermore, Edward Lloyd, John Love, Matthew Lyon, Josiah Masters, William McCreery, William Milnor, Nicholas R. Moore, Thomas Moore, Jonathan O. Mosely, Gurdon S. Mumford, Thomas

[blocks in formation]

Newton, Wilson C. Nicholas, Josiah Quincy, John
Randolph, John Rhea of Tennessee, Matthias Rich-
ards, Samuel Riker, John Rowan, John Russell, Lem-

uel Sawyer, Ebenezer Seaver, James Sloan, Jedediah K.
Smith, John Smith, Samuel Smith, Henry Southard,
William Stedman, Clement Storer, Lewis B. Sturges,
Peter Swart, Samuel Taggart, Benjamin Tallmadge,
John Thompson, Jabez Upham, James I. Van Alen,
Philip Van Cortlandt, Nicholas Van Dyke, Archibald
Van Horn, Killian K. Van Rensselaer, Isaac Wilbour,

Marmaduke Williams, and Nathan Wilson.

The question recurring on Mr. GHOLSON'S mo tion, a division of the question was called for, so as to take the question first on striking out the words, "fourth of March."

FEBRUARY, 1809.

Van Cortlandt, Nicholas Van Dyke, Archibald Van Horn, Killian K. Van Rensselaer, and Nathan Wilson. Mr. J. G. JACKSON moved to strike out that part of the bill, giving the President power to raise the embargo whenever the deerees of the belligerents are so modified as to render the commerce of the United States sufficiently safe; to make way for the amendment, which he yesterday offered, authorizing the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal against the Power retaining in force orders and decrees whenever the other shall revoke its edicts. He observed that there could be no doubt that gentlemen would agree to strike out this clause, whether Messrs. MASON, J. G. JACKSON, and TROUP, ad- they agree to insert the substitute or not; for alvocated a protraction of the date. It would be the most every member who had voted for striking out the clause relating to letters of marque and greatest injustice to the ports at a distance from the seat of Government, not to give notice of the reprisal, bad assigned as one great reason that it passage of the law, and was in the face of the pro-king him judge of the events which might call gave the President a Legislative power, by mavision of the Constitution, which required equal into action that provision of the law. The same privileges to every port. Messrs. MASTERS, RANDOLPH, and QUINCY, contended for an early or im- objection certainly attached to that part of the mediate repeal, on the ground that the embargo section which he now proposed to strike out. was originally laid without notice: that if our produce was exported, it ought to be exported im mediately; and that the people of Canada, or the smugglers of Amelia island or elsewhere, should not have an opportunity to take advantage of the honest part of our citizens.

The question on striking out was negatived, yeas 47, nays 66, as follows:

YEAS-Evan Alexander, Willis Alston, jun., David Bard, Burwell Bassett, William W. Bibb, William Blackledge, Thomas Blount, John Boyle, William Butler, Joseph Calhoun, Richard Cutts, John Dawson, Josiah Deane, Joseph Desha, John W. Eppes, Meshack Franklin, Thomas Gholson, jr., Peterson Goodwyn, James Holland, David Holmes, Benjamin Howard, John G. Jackson, Richard M. Johnson, Thomas Kenan, William Kirkpatrick, John Love, Nathaniel Macon, Robert Marion, John Montgomery, Thomas Moore, John Morrow, Thomas Newton, Wilson C. Nicholas, John Porter, John Rhea of Pennsylvania, John Rhea of Tennessee, Benjamin Say, John Smilie, Samuel Smith, Richard Stanford, John Taylor, George M. Troup, Robert Whitehill, Isaac Wilbour, David R. Williams, Marmaduke Williams, Alexander Wilson. NAYS-Ezekiel Bacon, Joseph Barker, John Blake, jun., Adam Boyd, Epaphroditus Champion, Martin Chittenden, Orchard Cook, John Culpeper, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, jun., Daniel M. Durell, James Elliot, William Ely, William Findley, James Fisk, Barent Gardenier, Francis Gardner, James M. Garnett, Isaiah L. Green, John Harris, William Helms, William Hoge, Reuben Humphreys, Daniel Ilsley, Richard Jackson, Robert Jenkins, James Kelly, Philip B. Key, John Lambert, Joseph Lewis, jun., Edward St. Loe Livermore, Edward Lloyd, Matthew Lyon, Josiah Masters, William McCreery, William Milnor, Jonathan O. Mosely, Gurdon S. Mumford, Thomas Newbold, John Pugh, Josiah Quincy, John Randolph, Jacob Richards, Matthias Richards, Samuel Riker, John Rowan, John Russel, Lemuel Sawyer, James Sloan, Jedediah K. Smith, John Smith, Henry Southard, William Stedman, Clement Storer, Lewis B. Sturges, Peter Swart, Samuel Taggart, Benjamin Tallmadge, John Thompson, Jabez Uphain, James I. Van Alen, Philip

The following is Mr. J.'s amendment: To strike out, after the words, "And be it further enacted.” in the first line of the eleventh section, as amended by the House, the following words:

66

That the President of the United States be and he hereby is authorized, in case either France or Great

Britain shall so revoke or modify her edicts, as that they

shall cease to violate the neutral commerce of the United States, to declare the same by proclamation: after which the trade of the United States suspended by this act, and by the act laying an embargo on all ships and vessels in the ports and harbors of the United States, and the several acts supplementary thereto, may be renewed with the nation so doing:"

And to insert, in lieu thereof, the words following. to wit:

"That in case either Great Britain or France shall revoke her edicts alleged to have been made in retaliation of the edicts of the other Powers, and violating the lawful commerce and neutral rights of the United States, the operation of this act, and also of the act laying an embargo on all ships and vessels in the ports and harbors of the United States, and the several acts supplementary thereto, shall cease in relation to the nation so revoking, at the expiration of twenty days, to be computed from the date of the notice of such revocation United States; and letters of marque and reprisal shall, to be given by Proclamation of the President of the at the same time, be issued against the nation which shall continue in force its unlawful edicts, violating the lawful commerce and neutral rights of the United States."

The House adjourned, 60 to 35, without taking a question.

SATURDAY, February 25.

On motion of Mr. WILLIS ALSTON it was agreed that the bill sent from the Senate, entitled "An act to interdict the commercial intercourse between the United States and Great Britain and France, and their dependencies, and for other purposes," together with the amendments agreed and proposed thereto, do lie on the table.

FEBRUARY, 1809.

Navy and Army Appropriations.

NAVY AND ARMY APPROPRIATIONS. The House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole on the bill for amending the acts establishing the War and Naval Departments, and making an appropriation for the support of the Military and Naval Establishments for the year

1809.

H. OF R.

Montgomery, Nicholas R. Moore, Jonathan O. Mosely, Gurdon S. Mumford, Thomas Newbold, Thomas Newton, Wilson C. Nicholas, Josiah Quincy, Samuel Ri

ker, John Rowan, John Russell, James Sloan, John Smilie, William Stedman, Clement Storer, Lewis B. Tallmadge, John Thompson, Jabez Upham, James I. Sturges, Peter Swart, Samuel Taggart, Benjamin Van Alen, Philip Van Cortlandt, Nicholas Van Dyke, Archibald Van Horn, Killian K. Van Rensselaer, Daniel C. Verplanck, Isaac Wilbour, and Nathan Wilson.

Amongst other appropriations proposed by the bill is one for fortifications, in addition to the sum already appropriated at this session. Mr. NAYS-David Bard, Joseph Barker, William W. ALSTON proposed to appropriate one million of Bibb, Thomas Blount, Adam Boyd, Robert Brown, dollars. It was observed by Mr. BLOUNT that all William A. Burwell, William Butler, Joseph Calthe money had been already appropriated which houn, Matthew Clay, John Culpeper, Josiah Deane, was required by the Department of War. The Joseph Desha, Daniel M. Durell, John W. Eppes, appropriation was supported by Messrs. W. AL- James Fisk, Meshack Franklin, Thomas Gholson, jr., STON, VAN CORTLANDT, COOK, MASTERS, TROUP, Peterson Goodwyn, Isaiah L. Green, John Heister, NICHOLAS. and SMILIE, and opposed by Messrs. William Hoge, James Holland, Thomas Kenan, John BLOUNT, STANFORD, BOYD, and D. R. WILLIAMS. Lambert, Edward Lloyd, Nathaniel Macon, Robert The arguments in favor of this appropriation Marion, Jeremiah Morrow, John Morrow, John Porter, were the importance of permanent defence; the John Rea of Pennsylvania, John Rhea of Tennessee, defenceless state of many ports, particularly of Matthias Richards, Benjamin Say, Ebenezer Seaver, New York, which was the pride and boast of Samuel Shaw, Jedediah K. Smith, John Smith, Richthe State; the probability of war, which ap-R. Williams, Marmaduke Williams, and Alexander ard Stanford, John Taylor, Robert Whitehill, David peared now only to be delayed on our part from Wilson. the defenceless state of the seaports; that if war was now to take place, the people of the cities must fly to the mountains; that it might be sufficient to complete them all, and would be the last appropriation asked for.

The appropriation of $445,000 for repairing the frigates was objected to by Mr. MACON, but concurred in-ayes 63.

Mr. BLOUNT moved to amend the section appropriating for fortifications, by striking out the words "in addition to," and inserting "inclu ding," so as to include in the appropriation the sum of $450,000 already appropriated, instead of adding one million to that sum. He afterwards withdrew this motion, and moved an amendment, so as to authorize the contemplated line of York. He did this to ascertain the sense of the blocks and chains across the harbor of New House on this point, for he should have the same

The arguments against it were: that as much had been appropriated as could be expended with ordinary exertions; that the House appeared to be taking a course of recession, instead of resistance, and there was, therefore, no extraordinary appropriation for fortifications against attack necessary; that there were about 700,000 dollars liable to expenditure for this object previous to the next session of Congress; that even were twenty millions appropriated, there was no evidence that New York could be sufficiently forti-objection to this appropriation if that were the fied, or that gentlemen would be satisfied; that war was not delayed by the defenceless state of the seaports, but by the indisposition of mercantile men to go to war against foreign taxation on the produce of the soil-if it had been on ships or the shipping interest they would have been clamorous for war.

The Committee agreed to insert one million of dollars, by a majority of eleven votes. The bill being gone through, the Committee rose and reported it.

The question on the appropriation of one million of dollars for fortifications was taken, and decided in the affirmative-yeas 61, nays 45, as follows:

object of it. A sufficient number of members
not rising to give the yeas and nays on this ques-
tion, Mr. BLOUNT withdrew the motion and re-
newed his former motion; which was negatived-
yeas 49, nays 62, as follows:

William W. Bibb, William Blackledge, Thos. Blount,
YEAS-David Bard, Jos. Barker, Burwell Bassett,
Joseph Calhoun, Matthew Clay, John Culpeper, Jo-
Robert Brown, William A. Burwell, William Butler,
siah Deane, Joseph Desha, Daniel M. Durell, John
W. Eppes, James Fisk, Meshack Franklin, Thomas
Gholson, jr., Peterson Goodwyn, Isaiah L. Green,
John Heister, William Hoge, James Holland, Thom-
as Kenan, John Lambert, Edward Lloyd, John Love,
Nathaniel Macon, Robert Marion, Jeremiah Morrow,
John Morrow, John Porter, John Randolph, John Rea
of Pennsylvania, John Rhea of Tennessee, Matthias
Richards, Benjamin Say, Ebenezer Seaver, Samuel
Shaw, Jedediah K. Smith, John Smith, Samuel Smith,
Richard Stanford, John Taylor, Robert Whitehill, David
R. Williams, Alexander Wilson, and Richard Winn.

YEAS-Evan Alexander, Lemuel J. Alston, Willis Alston, jun., Ezekiel Bacon, William Blackledge, John Blake, jr., John Boyle, Epaphroditus Champion, Martin Chittenden, Orchard Cook, Richard Cutts, John Davenport jr., John Dawson, James Elliot, William Ely, William Findley, Francis Gardner, John Har- NAYS-Evan Alexander, Lemuel J. Alston, Willis ris, William Helms, David Holmes, Benjamin How- Alston, jr., Ezekiel Bacon, John Blake, jr., John ard, Reuben Humphreys, Daniel Ilsley, John G. Jack-Boyle, Epaphroditus Champion, Martin Chittenden, Richard Jackson, Robert Jenkins, James Kelly, Joseph Lewis, jun., Edward St. Loe Livermore, Josiah Masters, William McCreery, William Milnor, John

son,

Orchard Cook, Richard Cutts, John Davenport, jr.,
John Dawson, James Elliot, William Ely, William
Findley, Francis Gardner, John Harris, Wm. Helms,

[blocks in formation]

David Holmes, Benjamin Howard, Reuben Humphreys, Daniel Ilsley, John G. Jackson, Richard Jackson, Robert Jenkins, Joseph Lewis, jr., Edward St. Loe Livermore, Josiah Masters, William McCreery, Wm. Milnor, John Montgomery, Nicholas R. Moore, Jonathan O. Mosely, Gurdon S. Mumford, Thomas Newbold, Thomas Newton, Wilson C. Nicholas, Josiah Quincy, Samuel Riker, John Rowan, John Russell, James Sloan, John Smilie, Henry Southard, William Stedman, Clement Storer, Lewis B. Sturges, Peter Swart, Samuel Taggart, Benjamin Tallmadge, John Thompson, George M. Troup, Jabez Upham, James I. Van Alen, Philip Van Cortlandt, Nicholas Van Dyke, Archibald Van Horn, Killian K. Van Rensselaer, Daniel C. Verplanck, Isaac Wilbour, Marmaduke Williums, and Nathan Wilson.

No other amendment being offered, the bill, and the amendments agreed to, were ordered to be engrossed, and read the third time on Monday next.

NON-INTERCOURSE.

The House resumed the consideration of the unfinished business of yesterday.

Mr. J. G. JACKSON withdrew his motion of yesterday with a view to offer another in place of it, which looked more like a manly stand. He said that the amendment proposed was no offer made to either Power to take sides with the other. There was nothing like threat in the proposition, any more than in the resolutions submitted to the House some time since. It would be a warning to the merchants under what peril they would go out, which they would not otherwise conceive, reposing in false security on this bill. He would not go precipitately into war, for he had the best reason to believe that Great Britain would be disposed to listen to the dictates of justice towards us, but if she did not, he was for immediate war. The amendment now proposed by Mr. JACKSON is as follows:

"SEC. 19. And be it further enacted, That after demand made and refused on the part of His Britannic Majesty to withdraw his decrees and orders infringing the local commerce of the United States, the President of the United States shall be authorized and required to employ such a portion of the volunteer militia of the United States, not exceeding thou sand, and of the regular troops, as may be necessary to take possession of the territories of His Britannic Majesty, bordering on the United States, and to hold the same, and to instruct the commanders of the public armed vessels which are or shall be employed in the service of the United States to subdue, seize, and take any armed or unarmed British vessel on the high seas or elsewhere; and such captured vessel, with her apparel, guns, and appurtenances, and the goods or effects which shall be found on board the same, being British property, shall be brought within some port of the United States, and shall be duly proceeded against and condemned, as forfeited, and shall accrue and be distributed as by law is or shall be provided respecting the captures which shall be made by the public armed

vessels of the United States.

"SEC. 20. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States shall be, and he is hereby, authorized and required, after demand and refusal as aforesaid, to grant to the owners of private

FEBRUARY, 1809.

armed vessels of the United States who shall make application therefor, special commissions, in the form which he shall direct, and under the seal of the United States; and such private armed vessels, when duly commissioned as aforesaid, shall have the same license and authority for the subduing, seizing, and capturing any armed or unarmed British vessel, and for the recapture of the vessels, goods, and effects of the United States, as the public armed vessels of the United States may by law have; and shall be, in like manner, subject to such instructions as shall be ordered by the President of the United States for the regulation of their conduct. And the commissions which shall be granted, shall be revocable at the pleasure of the President of the United States.

"SEC. 21. And be it further enacted, That after demand made, and refusal on the part of the Emperor of France to withdraw his decrees and orders infringing the lawful commerce of the United States, the President of the United States shall be authorized and required to instruct the commanders of the public armed vessels, which are or shall be employed in the service of the United States, to subdue, seize, and take any armed or unarmed French vessel on the high seas, or elsewhere, and such captured vessel, with her apparel, guns, and appurtenances, and the goods or effects which shall be found on board the same, being French property, shall be brought within some port of the and condemned as directed, and shall accrue and be United States, and shall be duly proceeded against distributed as by law is or shall be provided respecting the capture which shall be made by the public armed vessels of the United States.

SEC. 22. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States shall be, and he is hereby, authorized and required, after demand made and refusal aforesaid, to grant to the owners of private armed ships and vessels of the United States who shall make application therefor, special commissions in the form which he shall direct, and under the seal of the United States; and such private armed vessel, when duly commissioned as aforesaid, shall have the same license and authority for the subduing, seizing, and capturing any armed or unarmed French vessel, and for the recapture of the vessels, goods, and effects of the people of the United States, as the public armed vessels of the United States may by law have, and shall be in like manner subject to such instructions as shall be ordered by the President of the United States for the regulation of their conduct; and the commissions which shall be granted as aforesaid shall be revocable at the pleasure of the President of the United States."

Mr. EPPES said that this was a proposition which he hoped might unite all parties in the House. It authorized the President to demand the recall of the injurious acts of the belligerents, and on a refusal it declared that we would use all the force which we possess against the decrees and orders, which, under whatever aspect they could be viewed, were calculated to produce total ruin to all the great interests of the country. The bill under consideration, he feared, would afford no relief to the Southern country-their produce would still be lying on their hands. And indeed, take three dollars a hundred from the price of tobacco, (as the Orders in Council do,) and the cultivation of it is out of the question. If we allowed Great Britain to say that we shall

[blocks in formation]

not trade without coming and paying her a tax, where would be the limit to her extortion? If we were such dastardly wretches as to permit her to tax at will the great staples of the country, could it be supposed that she would ever allow us hereafter even to be the carriers of our own produce? Whatever present relief the bill might afford to the shipping interest, ruin would ultimately fall on every man who had anything at stake in the country. If we took no means to resist taxation he should be compelled to believe that what had been said was correct: that "the majority cannot be kicked into a war." And if some such measure as that proposed was not adopted, the assertion would stand as a damnable record to future ages. If we should hereafter be refractory, a foreign nation ought therefore not to send troops but men armed with whips to scourge us into obedience. He concluded by saying that he hoped the House would agree to postpone the consideration of the subject until Monday, that the amendments might be printed.

Mr. BASSETT also expressed his approbation of the proposition. There must be one of two intentions in the House, either to glide smoothly down the current of submission or take a higher ground, which must be war. Could it be believed that, if Great Britain maintained her system of excluding our commerce from the ocean, or subjecting it to heavy taxation, war was not inevitable? No man could conceal this fact from himself or from the nation.

Mr. D. R. WILLIAMS wished to offer an amend ment to the amendment, for the purpose of ascertaining the sense of the House on the subject of fighting. For this purpose he moved so to amend the bill as to authorize the President forthwith to use the public force, &c.

Mr. MASTERS opposed the postponement; he hoped the business would be finally concluded to-night.

The question being taken by yeas and nays on Mr. EPPES's motion for the postponement of the further consideration of the subject till Monday, there were for it 60, against it 60, as follows:

YEAS-Evan Alexander, Lemuel J. Alston, Willis Alston, jr., David Bard, Burwell Bassett, William W. Bibb, William Blackledge, Thomas Blount, John Boyle, Robert Brown, William A. Burwell, William Butler, Joseph Calhoun, Matthew Clay, Richard Cutts, John Dawson, Josiah Deane, John W. Eppes, William Findley, Meshack Franklin, Thomas Gholson, jun., Peterson Goodwyn, Isaiah L. Green, James Holland, David Holmes, Benjamin Howard, John G. Jackson, Richard M. Johnson, Thomas Kenan, John Love, Nathaniel Macon, Robert Marion, John Montgomery, Thomas Moore, Jeremiah Morrow, John Morrow, Thomas Newbold, Thomas Newton, Wilson C. Nicholas,

John Porter, John Pugh, John Rea of Pennsylvania,

John Rhea of Tennessee, Jacob Richards, Matthias Richards, Lemuel Sawyer, Benjamin Say, Ebenezer Seaver, Samuel Shaw, John Smilie, John Smith, Richard Stanford, John Taylor, George M. Troup, Robert Whitehill, Isaac Wilbour, Marmaduke Williams, Alexander Wilson, and Richard Winn.

H. OF R.

Chittenden, Orchard Cook, John Culpeper, Samuel
W. Dana, John Davenport, jun., Daniel M. Durell,
James Elliot, William Ely, James Fisk, Barent Gar-
denier, Francis Gardner, Edwin Gray, John Harris,
John Heister, William Helms, William Hoge, Reuben
Humphreys, Daniel Ilsley, Richard Jackson, Robert
Jenkins, James Kelly, John Lambert, Joseph Lewis,
jun., Edward St. Loe Livermore, Edward Lloyd, Josiah
Masters, William Milnor, Nicholas R. Moore, Jonathan
O. Mosely, Gurdon S. Mumford, Josiah Quincy, John
Randolph, Samuel Riker, John Rowan, John Russell,
James Sloan, Jedediah K. Smith, Samuel Smith, Henry
Southard, William Stedman, Clement Storer, Lewis B.
Sturges, Peter Swart, Samuel Taggart, Benjamin Tall-
madge, John Thompson, Abram Trigg, James I. Van
Alen, Philip Van Cortlandt, Nicholas Van Dyke,
Archibald Van Horn, Killian K. Van Rensselaer,
Daniel C. Verplanck, David R. Williams, and Nathan
Wilson.

The House being equally divided, the SPEAKER decided in the negative.

Mr. J. G. JACKSON wished to postpone the consideration of this amendment, so as not to delay the progress of the bill. The SPEAKER declared that a part of a subject before the House could not be postponed.

Mr. D. R. WILLIAMS rejoiced in the opportunity of registering his vote for war. He observed that the embargo must be considered as perfectly failing except as the precursor of war. We had a much greater hold now on the belligerents than we should ever have again. We had changed the balance of the ledger completely during the embargo. They had before an immense property of ours in their hands; we now had of theirs. Permit the embargo to be removed, and they would again have the same hold on us, and we should not go to war next session. Rather than give them notice that we meant to make war upon them at a certain time, he would seize all their citizens and set them to work on our fortifications-act the Algerine to them. Their Governments played the Algerine on us, and would not we do the same to them? He would seize everything but the funds. If the House could abandon our rights in this manner, when every square foot of our ground was laid under contribution, they deserved to be scoffed at by the world.

Mr. GARDENIER declared the amendment offered by Mr. J. G. JACKSON, to be unconstitutional; because the power of declaring war belonged to Congress, and was a power which they could not delegate.

WILLIAMS's amendment, a division of the quesThe question being about to be put on Mr. tion was called for, so as to take it first on striking out.

for striking out, to destroy the hypothetical chaMr. RANDOLPH observed, that he should vote racter of the proposition. If we were to have war at all, it ought to be direct.

Mr. EPPES observed that the proposition of Mr. JACKSON was not contingent, but complete. It authorized the President to say to each nation, NAYS-Ezekiel Bacon, Joseph Barker, John Blake," withdraw your orders or decrees." If not, it junior, Adam Boyd, Epaphroditus Champion, Martin was war, and immediate war. Means for it were

« PreviousContinue »