JunS ALEXANDER CAMPBELL. 189, ན་ A general informal convocation of the lead- Alexander Campbell had all the instincts and Iorced him to thrust aside all mere dogmas The Church of the Disciples also bears same Writ is the rule among them; and as there is No man of his time, probably, exerted a sincerity and and antipathy to sham honor. AN ADDRESS ON COLLEGES, Delivered in the City of Wheeling, Va., January, 1854, being one of a series of Lectures in behalf of the erection of a new Church Edifice in that city. Ladies and GENTLEMEN: We have selected for this occasion, connected, as it is, with the erection of a temple for Christian worship, the subject of Colleges. Colleges and churches go hand in hand in the progress of Christian civilization. Indeed, the number of colleges and churches in any community, is the indication and exponent of its Christian civilization and advancement. There is, it appears, designedly or undesignedly, some sort of a connection or relationship between them. The oldest college found in the annals of the world, is thus associated. Seven hundred years before the Christian era there was a college in Jerusalem, intimately associated with religion. A prophetess made it her abode, in connection with other eminent personages. But we presume not to say what its peculiarities or distinguishing characteristics were. "Schools for the Prophets" there were in the days of the Kings of Israel. Indeed, in the latitude of this word Prophets, nothing is specific, save that they were teachers of the people, and, in some way, connected with the teaching of religion. But, as we can learn little from these colleges, we shall say little of them, and request your attention to those institutions called colleges amongst ourselves, and in the history, progress and philosophy of SERIES IV.-VOL. IV. 6 which we and our contemporaries are better informed, and, incomparably, more interested. Colleges and schools of every rank are, or ought to be, founded on some great principle in human nature and in human society. They are presumed to have been, and of right ought to be, founded on a sound philosophy of man, and of man in all his relations to society and the universe. Hence, the first question to be satisfactorily settled is, What is man? Lord, what is man? Lord, what is man? The greatest mystery to man is often man himself. It is yet, with myriads of our race, a still litigated question. Is he a mere animated particle of this earth-a purely physical and animal being? If he be so, then his education or development should be purely physical, differing little from that of a horse, a dog, or an ox. These are gregarious animals, and, therefore, social in their nature. And having been created for the use of man, they are only susceptible of just such an education as fits them for his use and service. Apart from their relation to man, they need no education for themselves. They, indeed, according to those who deny the inspiration of the Bible, are superior to man in this respect, that they have in themselves an instinctive and infallible law that safely conducts them through life, and in reference to their whole destiny. The gross materialists and sceptics, of all schools, degrade themselves below these animals, in denying the Bible. Man has not instinct sufficient to choose or to refuse food or medicine. But the brute creation have an infallible instinct, adequate to all that is necessary to their whole destiny. They are, moreover, susceptible of receiving such an education and training as amply fits them for the service of man. We have schools and teachers for them. The graduates in the schools of dogs, oxen and horses, are much more valuable than uneducated and untrained dogs, oxen, or horses. A well educated ox, ass, horse, or dog, will command a much greater price, because much more valuable to man. If man, then, were a mere animal, his education, of course, should differ little from that of the dog, the horse, or the ox. And, indeed, with shame be it spoken, we occasionally find some in human form not so well educated as their dogs, oxen and horses. ཟ But is man himself a mere case of well-assorted instruments, with locomotive power? A mere beast of burthen? A purely carnal machine? If so, in what consists his superiority to the beasts that perish? Is it that he is a biped, and more sagacious than the beasts of the field-more imitative than a monkey or an ape? Then, indeed, his education is a very simple affair, and soon consummated. But who so contemplates man? Shall we admit such a fallen creature into the circles of humanity? We could not argue such a question in the 19th century, and in the presence of American citizens. |