A

REFUTATION

OF

SUNDRY BAPTIST ERRORS,

PARTICULARLY AS THEY ARE SET FORTH IN A RECENT WORK

OF

REV. J. J. WOOLSEY,

AND IN THE

THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF THE AM. AND FOR. BIBLE SOCIETY.

BY EDWIN HALL,

PASTOR OF THE FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, NORWALK, CT.

NORWALK, CT..

PUBLISHED BY JOHN A. WEED.

NEW YORK:

GOULD, NEWMAN, AND SAXTON;

ROBINSON, PRATT, AND CO.

1841.

AND

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1841, by

EDWIN HALL,

in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States, for the District of Connecticut.

S. W. BENEDICT, PRINTER, 128 FULTON-ST.

CONTENTS.

Page

Classic Greek and the Greek of the New Testament.

The intent and bearing of the discussion concerning

the Classic use and the New Testament use.

The question brought to an issue.

The conclusion further corroborated.

Mr. Judd on Mark vii. 4.

Mr. Carson on Mark vii. 4.

Mr. Woolsey's choice of alternatives.

The Baptists at war with each other.

George Campbell on Mark vii. 4 and Luke xi. 38.

Professor Ripley on Mark vii. 4 and Luke xi. 38.

The conclusion.

Baptist Missionary translations.

The proof cumulative.

Scriptural idea of Baptism.

Our English translators and our common English Bible.

Defining the word Baptize.

Translating the word Baptize.

No new thing to transfer peculiar words from one lan-

guage to another.

To transfer the word Baptize into foreign languages

neither teaches error nor conceals the truth.