Dred Scott V. Sandford: A Slave's Case for Freedom and CitizenshipA lawsuit filed in 1846 by Dred Scott, an African-American slave, to gain freedom for himself and his family became a landmark legal case in U.S. history. Scott's argument that he became free when his owner took him to a free state did not prevail. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that he was still a slave, he was not a U.S. citizen, and so he could not sue in federal court. The decision angered many Americans and pushed the country toward civil war. |
Common terms and phrases
1850 Irene Emerson abolitionist African-Americans Alabama Alexander antislavery argued Armstrong attorney banned slavery Benjamin Curtis Blow family Blow operated born Chapter Chief Justice civil marriage civil rights Congress cotton gin court ruled court's decision daughter Douglass Dred and Harriet Dred Scott decision Eliza and Lizzie filed forever free Fort Armstrong Fort Jesup Fort Snelling free territory freed freedom Harriet Scott Illinois Jesup John Emerson John McLean John Sanford Judge lawsuit Louisiana March married Missouri Compromise Missouri Supreme Court Montgomery Blair Murdoch newspaper Northerners once free owner Peter Blow plantation President Rachel Roger Taney Sanford's lawyers Scott claimed Scott family Scott lived Scott moved Scott's lawyer Significance in American slavery was illegal slaves SNAPSHOTS IN HISTORY Snelling Southerners Taliaferro Taylor Blow Territory where slavery took Travels with Emerson trial U.S. Constitution U.S. government U.S. senator U.S. Supreme Court United Virginia voted Washington Whitesides wife Winny Wisconsin Territory York