114 Mr. Dougherty to Mr. Sept. 1 Blaine-Continued.
Mr. Wharton to Mr. Dough. erty.
fled to the United States, arriving in New York about December 12, 1889; that, prior to his de- sertion, the only punishment to which he was sentenced was 1 month's imprisonment for con- tumacy, which he would not have had to un- dergo until the time of his discharge; that this shows how unfounded are his assertions as to his ill treatment, his incarceration, and his es- cape from the prisons of Alessandria; that it was Mileo's duty to present himself for enroll. ment on reaching the age of conscription; and that, by article 12 of the Italian code, he was subject to military duty in spite of the acquisi- tion of a new nationality, which, moreover, he had acquired when he was already guilty of contumacy; that he was inscribed on the con- scription list of the Kingdom, and in fact, en- rolled.
Claim of Nicolino Mileo: No. 114 received. Sig. nor Damiani admits that Mileo was imprisoned 1 month prior to his desertion and to bis 51 months' service. The United States Govern ment can not but regard such punishment as harsh and inequitable under the circumstances. Signor Damiani denies the detention of Mileo's wife; but the lateness of the date of her pass- port is not wholly inconsistent with the state- ment that her repeated endeavors-begun be- fore the birth of her child to obtain permission to depart had met with refusal. Claim of Nicolino Mileo: No. 79 received. In- terview of the 6th instant with Signor Dam iani. The latter did not say, in his note of August 22, that Mileo had been imprisoned for a month, but that he had been sentenced to suf fer a month's imprisonment, which was, how. ever, not to be inflicted until the period of his becoming entitled to "unlimited leave," and that, Mileo having escaped before that time, no punishment had been undergone. The Italian Government denies that any obstacles were at any time interposed to Mrs. Mileo's departure for the United States.
Mr. Blaine to Mr. Porter.... Nov. 26 Claim of Nicolino Mileo: Cancels that part of Department's No. 79, of September 19, relating to the month's imprisonment.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE LEGATION OF ITALY AT WASHINGTON.
Baron Fava to Mr. Blaine... Mar. 19
Extradition of Vincenzo Villella and Giuseppe Bevivino: Incloses for transmission two letters rogatory relating to the trial of Villella and Bevivino in Italy.
Same subject: Has forwarded the letters roga- tory. Reserves the right, which the United States Government thinks that it possesses, to have the fugitives surrendered for trial in the place where their offenses were committed. Has forwarded the letters rogatory in order that the ends of justice may not, if possible, be entirely defeated. The United States demanded the surrender of the two fugitives more than a year ago. Italy declined to surrender them, on the ground that they were Italian subjects. The treaties require the surrender of persons generally, and make no exception in favor of citizens or subjects.
Same subject: Note of 21st ultimo received. It is for the very purpose of preventing the ends of justice being defeated that Bevivino and Vil. lella are now imprisoned in Italy and that the letters rogatory have been sent. Requests the speedy transmission of the documents asked for in the said letters rogatory. The question of the extradition of Italian subjects by Italy has been fully discussed and entirely settled
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE LEGATION OF ITALY AT WASHINGTON-Continued.
1890. Baron Fava to Mr. Blaine- Apr. 20 Continued.
between the Italian ministry of foreign affairs and the United States legation at Rome. Ac- cording to Italian law no citizen can be re- moved from the jurisdiction of his natural judges, those of his own country. The extradi- tion of a citizen is not admissible under the Italian penal code. This principle has not only become a part of the public law of Europe, but has been recognized by the United States in its extradition treaties with Austria-Hungary, Baden, Bavaria, Belgium, Hayti, Mexico, the Netherlands, Turkey, Prussia, Germany, Spain, Sweden and Norway, and Salvador. It can not be claimed, on the ground of the absence in the treaty between Italy and the United States of an express r servation in favor of natives of the two countries, that Italy has renounced a doc- trine which is based upon her own laws and her own public law. The Italian Government is therefore justified in declaring that neither the spirit of the Italian law nor the text of the treaty would permit it to comply with the re- quest for the extradition of Bevivino and Vil- lella. There is no ground for the inference from the foregoing that the guilty parties would escape punishment. They have been arrested, are now in prison, and their trial would now have been ended if the Pennsylvania courts had forwarded the papers asked for early in 1889.
June 5 Extradition of Vincenzo Villella and Giuseppe Bevivino: Requests the speedy transmission of the papers asked for in the letters rogatory ac- companying his note of March 19, 1890.
Mr. Blaine to Baron Fava... June 13 Extradition of Vincenzo Villella and Giuseppe
Bevivino: Returns the letters rogatory which had been forwarded to the governor of New York and sent back by him with directions as to their execution. Advises that they be sent to the Italian consul at New York.
Baron Fava to Mr. Blaine... June 16, Same subject: Has instructed the Italian consul
general at New York to take the necessary steps.
Mr. Blaine to Baron Fava... June 23 Same subject: Reply to note of April 20. The question at issue is not one of Italian law, but of an international compact between the United States and Italy. Is surprised that the Italian Government regards the question as settled by the ministry of foreign affairs and the United States legation. Mr. Stallo protested against the position taken by the Italian Government. Gives a history of the case of Salvatore Paladini. Reviews the negotiations in the case of Villella and Bevivino. Adduces arguments and cites authorities to show that the refusal of the Italian Government to surrender Paladini, Villella, and Bevivino, under the treaty of 1868, is not justified by the principles of international law. The present situation seems to require either the denunciation of the treaty of 1868, or the conclusion of new stipulations with regard to the extradition of citizens. Same subject: Has communicated note of June 23 to his Government. Says there must have been some mistake respecting the staten ent of the Italian consul at Philadelphia that the Italian Government would grant the extradition of Villella and Bevivino.
Baron Fava to Mr. Blaine.. July 3
Mr.Wharton to Baron Fava. July 29 Aug. 1
Baron Fava to Mr. Blaine..
Same subject: Has again urged the governor of Pennsylvania to expedite the transmission of the documents needed. Same subject: The local authorities at Wilkes Barre have been directed by the governor of Pennsylvania to forward the papers. Aug. 8 Extradition and naturalization: Incloses a copy of a dispatch of the 27th ultimo, from the Ital- ian foreign office, stating that in January, 1889, the American minister at Rome, Mr. Stallo, had commenced negotiations with a view to the adoption of an additional article to the ex- tradition convention of 1868 between Italy and
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE LEGATION OF ITALY AT WASHINGTON-Continued.
the United States, the object of said article being the prohibition of the surrender by each state of its own subjects or citizens; and the signing of a convention of naturalization by the two countries, such as would be rendered necessary by the new article, and similar to that existing between the United States and Belgium; that the Italian Government received this proposition favorably and on the 27th of April, 1889, addressed a note to Mr. Stallo, ac cepting his proposition in general, but proposing a few modifications in his draft, and an addition to the article relative to extradition. Incloses a copy of said note of April 27, 1889, and requests a reply to the counter propositions made therein. Extradition of Vincenzo Villella and Giuseppe Bevivino: The district attorney of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, is now trying to find two witnesses whose testimony is indispensable. Same subject: Again asks the good offices of the Department to procure the necessary documents from Pennsylvania.
Same subject: The governor of Pennsylvania has again called upon the authorities of Luzerne County to expedite the execution of the letters rogatory.
Same subject: Two of the most important witnesses not yet found. Same subject: The district attorney of Luzerne County hopes to have the testimony of witnesses ready for transmission in a few days. Extradition and naturalization: Reply to note of August 8. Can not regard the note of April 27, 1889, as satisfactory. The purport of the proposed article seems to be that, while citizenship is recognized as a ground for refusing extradition, citizenship by naturalization can not confer the right to demand it; the only effect conceded to naturalization is that, when joined with a subsequent residence of 5 years, it may afford a ground to withhold extradition. The United States Government can not assent to the stipulation that it shall agree to the enforcement against its citizens, if they set foot in Italy, of those provisions of the Italian code which relate to the punishment of foreigners for acts committed outside of Italy. The language of the note is not entirely explicit as to military service, but it is not understood to mean that a person who, having been naturalized as a citizen of the United States, owes allegiance and duty to that country, is at the same time to continue to owe the allegiance and duty of a subject to the King of Italy. Incloses a copy of the second article of the naturalization treaty of September 20, 1870, between the United States and Austria-Hungary.
Medals and brevets presented by the Japanese Government to certain American citizens: Incloses a copy of a note of the 18th ultimo, from the foreign office, transmitting medals and brevets conferred by the Emperor on certain members and ex-members of the legation. Has forwarded those intended for Mr. Hubbard and Mr. Mansfield. Asks for instructions concerning those intended for Mr. Dun and Dr. Whitney.
Taxes levied upon the sale of "Scott's Emul. sion:" The China and Japan Trading Com pany, in 1887, made arrangements for placing upon the Japanese market an American prepar
88 Mr. Swift to Mr. Blaine- Feb. 5 Continued.
ation of cod-liver oil, known as "Scott's Emul- sion," and expended several thousand dollars in advertising it. In 1889 they arranged with Japanese retail merchants for its sale, and be- gan selling. The sales were very satisfactory. Soon afterwards the Japanese authorities noti. fied the native merchants that they must each take out a special license for the sale of "Scott's Emulsion." The American importers, to avoid delay and trouble, instructed the native mer- chants to take out the license, and applied to Mr. Swift to obtain a revocation of the order. He accordingly wrote to the foreign office September 13, 1889, relating the facts and stat- ing that, in his opinion, the requirement of the license was a violation of the treaty of July 29, 1858. Subsequently the agent of the China and Japan Trading Company informed Mr. Swift that the Japanese merchants engaged in selling "Scott's Emulsion" had been required to pay an excise tax of 10 per cent. ad valorem upon the retail price of each bottle; that they had thereupon returned the stock on hand to the importers and ceased to sell the article. On the 4th of October, 1889, Mr. Swift wrote to the foreign office asking for a reply to his note of September 13 and calling attention to the ex- cise tax of 10 per cent. demanded on the price of each bottle of "Scott's Emulsion." The for- eign office replied January 17, 1890, contending that, under the treaty of 1858, the Japanese Government had the right to require the license and to levy the excise tax. Incloses a memo- randum of his conversation of January 23, 1890, with the minister of foreign affairs and copies of correspondence.
Taxes levied on "Scott's Emulsion:" Incloses a copy of a note of the 6th instant, from the min- ister of foreign affairs, transmitting a memo- randum of his conversation of January 23 with Mr. Swift; and a copy of Mr. Swift's reply of the 10th instant, transmitting a memorandum pointing out certain errors in Viscount Aoki's memorandum.
Mar. 18 Rope made of human hair: Sends, for transmis sion to the Smithsonian Institution, a section of a rope made of human hair, used in the con- struction of a Buddhist temple at Kioto, and a photograph of the rolls of cable still remaining at the temple. Incloses a copy of a letter on the subject from V. Marshall Law, dated 6th in-
Mr. Blaine to Mr. Swift .... Mar. 18
Taxes levied upon "Scott's Emulsion:" Discusses the questions involved; approves his protest; is compelled to regard the action of the Japan- ese Government as a clear and substantial vio- lation of the provisions of the treaty of 1858. Reply to No. 88. Medals and brevets presented by the Japanese Government to certain American citizens: Sec- tion 9, article 1, of the Constitution provides that no person holding any office of profit or trust under the Government shall, without the con- sent of Congress, accept any present, emolu. ment, office, or title from any king, prince, or foreign state; section 3 of the act of January 31, 1881, provides that any such present, deco- ration, or other thing shall be tendered through the Department of State. Reply to No. 80. Taxes levied upon "Scott's Emulsion:" No. 91 re- ceived. The differences between Mr. Swift's and Viscount Aoki's memoranda of their inter- view of January 23, do not involve the merits of the question at issue. Military and naval maneuvers from the 30th nitimo to the 4th instant described. Rope made of human hair: Received and sent to the Smithsonian Institution. Instructs him to convey the thanks of the Government to the Buddhist priests and to Mr. V, M. Law. Reply
Mr. Blaine to Mr. Swift..... June 12
129 Mr. Swift to Mr. Blaine ...
Taxes levied upon "Scott's Emulsion:" Has sent to the foreign office a copy of Mr. Blaine's No. 59 of March 18.
Same subject: No. 120 received. No occasion to renew representations, unless the Japanese Government continues to tax the article and without submitting a reply to the views of the Department.
July 7 Same subject: Incloses a copy of a note of the 5th instant from the minister of foreign affairs, stating that he had instructed the Japanese chargé at Washington to communicate the fur- ther views of the Japanese Government to Mr. Blaine. Political: Describes the elections for members of the Diet on the 1st ultimo. Incloses a clip- ping headed "Political parties in the Diet," and a copy of the law of July 25, 1890, relative to meetings and political associations.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE LEGATION OF JAPAN AT WASHINGTON.
Mr. Sato to Mr. Blaine...... Mar. 7
Mr. Blaine to Mr. Sato...... Mar. 18
Mr. Sato to Mr. Blaine...... July 28
Taxes levied in Japan upon "Scott's Emulsion:" States the facts in the case and gives a history of the correspondence between the United States minister at Tokio and the minister of foreign affairs on the subject. Argues to show that the said taxes are not an infringement of the treaty of 1858. The Japanese Government will, however, abolish the taxes if it can be conclusively shown that it is mistaken in its opinion.
Same subject: The arguments contained in his note of the 7th instant do not remove the Depart- ment's impression that the levying of the taxes in question is a direct violation of the treaties. The United States minister at Tokio has been instructed to make a full communication of the views of the United States Government to the minister of foreign affairs. Same subject: Incloses a copy of an instruction of the 5th instant from the minister of foreign affairs, stating facts and adducing arguments to show that neither the requirement of the li cense nor the levying of the excise tax is an in- fringement of the treaty of 1858.
Same subject: Stilphen is out on bail. Incloses a copy of his note of this date to the minister of foreign affairs, stating that an American citi. zen named Patton, charged with assault and battery at Coatzacoalcos, boarded the Robert Ruff at sea, outside of the jurisdiction of Mex- ico; that a boat, containing certain persons in citizens' clothes, approached the schooner, and that one of the persons, speaking in Spanish and exhibiting a paper, apparently solicited the surrender of Patton; that Captain Stilphen paid no attention to the request and kept the schooner on her course; and that on his return to Coatzacoalcos he was arrested on the charge of aiding a criminal to escape; that the United States Government is of the opinion that, upon the facts stated, there is no ground for Captain Stilphen's detention, and that he should be set at liberty without delay.
« PreviousContinue » |