it roughly. In the Nonconformist Churches of England, the transition from Psalm-singing in the versions of Sternhold and Hopkins, Patrick, Barton, and others, to hymn-singing was, as we have said, brought about by the labours of Dr. Watts, whose version of the Psalms forms a kind of connecting link between the two, partaking as they do of the characteristics of both. The elements in them drawn from the Book of Psalms connect them with the age of the metrical versions, whilst the elements drawn from the New Testament connect them with the hymn-singing era which followed, and of which Dr. Watts was the real pioneer. Many other metrical versions of the Psalms were made in early times by Sir Philip Sidney and his sister Mary, Countess of Pembroke, Bishop King, George Sandys, Lord Bacon of seven of the Psalms, and others; some of these were highly poetic, but not cast in a form suitable or public worship, and never came into use in the Church. Those who desire to pursue the subject further should consult "The Story of the Psalters," by Henry Alexander Bell (Kegan Paul & Co., 1888) who gives an account of 123 complete versions of the Psalms, and specimens from each, of renderings of the 1st and 23rd Psalm. In the following table of editions now in the British Museum Library, the relative popularity of the principal versions is clearly seen: CHAPTER VII. EARLY ENGLISH HYMNS. THERE are few, if any, English hymns to be found before the beginning of the seventeenth century. To the fifteenth century belong a few hymns addressed to the Virgin and Christ. These have been edited from the Lambert MS., No. 853, by Mr. Furnivall, for the Early English Text Society. One of these, on "The Sweetness of Jesus," is very tender and beautiful; another, on "The Love of Jesus," likens love to a fire which cleanses us from sin, and joins man to God. But since worship had not yet come to be offered through the vernacular, it is all but certain that such hymns were only for private reading and meditation. Before the seventeenth century, there is much noble sacred English poetry, but few, if any hymns capable of being sung in the congregation. And these poems, as it has been well said, were "too subtle and fanciful ever to come home to the hearts of the people. They were written for a choice few to enjoy. They were full of those subtle allusions, half the pleasure of which consists in the ingenuity required to understand as well as to invent them. Such hymns could never be sung, like Luther's, by little children at Christmas, or become a nation's battle-song, or sweetly distil peace at moments when heart and flesh failed, and mortal effort was impossible; when the soul had lost its power to cling to anything. The verses of this period bear witness to the piety or the poetical power of the writers rather than to the faith of the times." This is true, especially when the general ignorance of the people of that time is taken into account. The spread of education has, however, now quickened intelligence, and made men capable of appreciating a style of hymn which, in earlier times, would have been beyond them. This will account for the presence, in our hymnals, of verses known in early times only to those of the literary class; whilst, in addition to this, it must be remembered that the habit of these earlier times was to look to one hymnist rather than to a multitude for the provision of hymns for worship. Indeed, the really hymn-singing age was not yet, and did not begin till the time of Watts. But still, scattered over the then existing English literature, there were the materials for a good, if not a large book of worship-song. It remained for our own age to search out and utilise these overlooked and neglected treasures. The hymn, "O Lord, turn not Thy face from me," attributed [by some to John Mardley, and by others to John Marckant, and belonging to about the middle of the 16th century, is probably the earliest really English hymn to be found in our present-day hymnals. Sir Egerton Brydges is inclined to attribute some versions of the Psalms in Sternhold and Hopkins signed M. to Mardley. The hymn to which we have referred is not without merit. It is usually given in the variation of Bishop Heber. Here is the original : O Lord, turn not Thy face from me, A gate which opens wide to those Shut not that gate against me. Lord, And call me not to strict account, So come I to Thy mercy gate, Mercy, good Lord, mercy I ask, For mercy, Lord, is all my suit: George Sandys (1577-1643), is a much more notable contributor to hymnody. Dryden called him "the best versifier of his age." He wrote "a Paraphrase upon the Psalms of David, and upon the hymns dispersed throughout the Old and New Testaments," and a poetical version of the Song of Solomon. The most notable of his renderings is of the 61st Psalm, beginning "Happy sons of Israel." George Wither (1588-1667), wrote too much, it is true, but scattered over his writings are hymns that are likely to retain their place in the song of the Church. The best known are 'Come, O come, with sacred lays;" "The Lord is King, and weareth," a version of the 93rd Psalm; and "Lord, living here are we," a hymn for the anniversary of marriage-quaint and beautiful, and not unlike to George Herbert. It is so little known that I append it : Lord, living here are we, As when our hands and hearts by Thee And in a thankful song Now sing we will Thy praise, Together we have now But how much time Thou wilt allow Let each of other's wealth And of each other's joy and health As if we daily were to take The frowardness that springs Or from those troublous outward things Or to disturb our true accord, But let these frailties prove And that discretion teach our love Shall fix our love on Thee for aye, Robert Herrick (born 1591) is better known by the secular poetry of his "Hesperides," than by his contributions to sacred song, which are included in "Noble Numbers," but his "Litany to the Holy Spirit," though |