No Party Now: Politics in the Civil War NorthDuring the Civil War, Northerners fought each other in elections with almost as much zeal as they fought Southern rebels on the battlefield. Yet politicians and voters alike claimed that partisanship was dangerous in a time of national crisis. In No Party Now, Adam I. P. Smith challenges the prevailing view that political processes in the North somehow helped the Union be more stable and effective in the war. Instead, Smith argues, early efforts to suspend party politics collapsed in the face of divisions over slavery and the purpose of the war. At the same time, new contexts for political mobilization, such as the army and the avowedly non-partisan Union Leagues, undermined conventional partisan practices. The administration's supporters soon used the power of anti-party discourse to their advantage by connecting their own antislavery arguments to a powerful nationalist ideology. By the time of the 1864 election they sought to de-legitimize partisan opposition with slogans like "No Party Now But All For Our Country!" No Party Now offers a reinterpretation of Northern wartime politics that challenges the "party period paradigm" in American political history and reveals the many ways in which the unique circumstances of war altered the political calculations and behavior of politicians and voters alike. As Smith shows, beneath the superficial unity lay profound differences about the implications of the war for the kind of nation that the United States was to become. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 35
Page 6
... claims to moral and political leadership. They did this because to many Republicans, slavery was only the most virulent symptom of a larger national malaise. Yankee Protestant elites, with their allies in the evangelical churches and ...
... claims to moral and political leadership. They did this because to many Republicans, slavery was only the most virulent symptom of a larger national malaise. Yankee Protestant elites, with their allies in the evangelical churches and ...
Page 7
... claim to the mantle of patriotism, battling to define loyalty. A large number of Northerners, describing themselves as Unionists and conservatives, fiercely opposed secession but argued that abolitionists had to share some of the blame ...
... claim to the mantle of patriotism, battling to define loyalty. A large number of Northerners, describing themselves as Unionists and conservatives, fiercely opposed secession but argued that abolitionists had to share some of the blame ...
Page 8
... claim to the mantle of Unionism. Chapters four and five focus on new organizations and sites of political action—the Loyal Leagues and the army—that complicated and gave new meaning to electoral battles. Chapters six and seven explain ...
... claim to the mantle of Unionism. Chapters four and five focus on new organizations and sites of political action—the Loyal Leagues and the army—that complicated and gave new meaning to electoral battles. Chapters six and seven explain ...
Page 15
... claim that their party was not a party as such, but the embodiment of the political will of the “whole people” or the “real nation.” There is, in other words, a larger issue here about the way 15 concepts of party and nation before the ...
... claim that their party was not a party as such, but the embodiment of the political will of the “whole people” or the “real nation.” There is, in other words, a larger issue here about the way 15 concepts of party and nation before the ...
Page 16
... claim that the only issue of consequence was the survival of the republic. When, in 1800, a determined Connecticut Jeffersonian, Abraham Bishop, made a well-publicized speech attacking the Federalist establishment in the nation and the ...
... claim that the only issue of consequence was the survival of the republic. When, in 1800, a determined Connecticut Jeffersonian, Abraham Bishop, made a well-publicized speech attacking the Federalist establishment in the nation and the ...
Contents
3 | |
9 | |
2 The Patriotic Imperative | 25 |
3 The Emancipation Proclamation and the Party System | 49 |
4 The Union Leagues and the Emergence of Antiparty Nationalism | 67 |
5 The Army Loyalty and Dissent | 85 |
6 Slavery Reconstruction and the Union Party | 101 |
7 Emancipation and Antiparty Nationalism in the 1864 Election Campaign | 124 |
Conclusion | 154 |
Notes | 167 |
Bibliography | 223 |
Index | 259 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham Lincoln administration American appeal argued army August battle Boston Brooklyn Daily Eagle called campaign candidate cause Charles Chicago citizens City Civil Civil War claim Club Collection Committee Congressional Connecticut conservative Constitution convention crisis culture Daily Democratic Party Democrats Division draft editor effect efforts election electoral emancipation example explained former George Henry History Illinois issue James John July June leaders leading letter Lincoln Papers Loyal loyalty majority March McClellan means meeting military newspaper nominated North Northern November October Ohio opposed opposition organization partisan partisanship patriotic peace Pennsylvania Philadelphia platform political politicians President presidential quoted radical rebel rebellion reported Representatives republic Republican Party rhetoric September Seward slavery Society soldiers South Southern speech tion Union League Union Party Unionists United University Press victory vote voters warned wartime Whigs wrote York