...of an agency's enabling Act, NLRB v. Iron Workers, supra, at 350, they must not "rubber-stamp . . . administrative decisions that they deem inconsistent...frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute." NLRB v. Brown, 380 US 278, 291-292 (1965). See Chemical & Alkali Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass...

...I?> /niblif Aviation Corp. \. NLRB, 324 US 793, 803, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372. Reviewing courts are not obliged to stand aside and rubber-stamp their...frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute. Such review is always properly within the judicial province, and courts would abdicate their responsibility...

...final authorities on issues of statutory construction, FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 US 374, 385, and "are not obliged to stand aside and rubber-stamp...frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute." NLRB v. Brown, 380 US 278, 291. "The deference owed to an expert tribunal cannot be allowed to slip...

...final authorities on issues of statutory construction, FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 US 374, 385, and "are not obliged to stand aside and rubber-stamp...frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute." NLRB v. Brown, 380 US 278, 291. "The deference owed to an expert tribunal cannot be allowed to slip...

...affirmed if it has a reasonable basis in law. But the courts are the final authorities on the issue of statutory construction, and are not obliged to...their affirmance of administrative decisions that they feel are inconsistent with the statutory mandate or frustrate the legislative policy." They do not...

...affirmed if it has a reasonable basis in law. But the courts are the final authorities on the issue of statutory construction, and are not obliged to stand aside and rubberstamp their affirmance of ad ministrative decisions that they feel are inconsistent with the statutory mandate or frustrate the...

...Court of Appeals reasoned, the case fell within the admonition that reviewing courts in labor cases not "rubber-stamp their affirmance of administrative decisions...frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute." NLRB v. Brown, 380 US 278, 291 (1965). Assuming without deciding that the delay in issuing the specification...

...substitute its judgment for that of the agency" on matters of fact, Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 416 (1971), "the courts are the...frustrate the Congressional policy underlying a statute.' " Volkswagenwerk v. FMC, 390 US 261, 272 (1968) (citations omitted). As the Supreme Court stated in...

.... . Bui the courts are the Anal authorities on issues of statutory construction [citations omitted] and 'are not obliged to stand aside and rubber-stamp'...inconsistent with a statutory mandate or that frustrate congressional policy underlying a statute." (Emphasis supplied.) 4. Disclosure of unpublished policies....

...and ordinarily that construction will be affirmed if it has a 'reasonable basis in law.' . . . But the Courts are the final authorities on issues of...frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute.' . . . 'The deference owed to an expert tribunal cannot be allowed to slip into a judicial inertia ....