The theory and practice of argumentation and debateThe object of this book is to furnish practical directions for the preparation and presentation of oral and written arguments. Teachers of Argumentation and Debate have come to realize that interest can best be stimulated and practical results best secured by omitting the theoretical forms of reasoning at first, and leading the student directly to the actual work of building up an argument. The technical name of a logical process has little to do with its practical application. This fact is well illustrated by the constant use of arguments in our conversation: moreover, the student who enters upon this work is sufficiently advanced to appreciate the difference between truth and error. For these reasons, the book is divided into two parts, the first of which deals with the Practice of Argumentation and Debate. After the student has had some experience in constructing and presenting arguments he is better fitted to make practical application of the theoretical principles of argumentation which are presented in the second part of this book under the head of the Theory of Argumentation and Debate. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 60
Page
... method of procedure. On the other hand many people contend that High License, or the regulating of the sale of such liquor, is the best method of procedure. This is a proper subject for a written argument or an oral debate, because the ...
... method of procedure. On the other hand many people contend that High License, or the regulating of the sale of such liquor, is the best method of procedure. This is a proper subject for a written argument or an oral debate, because the ...
Page
... method should be adopted . Thus far we have dealt with the subject - matter of the proposition and have seen that it must meet the three foregoing requirements . We must now turn our attention to the phrasing of this subject in such a ...
... method should be adopted . Thus far we have dealt with the subject - matter of the proposition and have seen that it must meet the three foregoing requirements . We must now turn our attention to the phrasing of this subject in such a ...
Page
... method of excluding undesirable matter is preferable to an attempt to include any restriction in the body of the proposition. The latter method is quite likely to lead to difficulties, in the form of ambiguities and their attendant ...
... method of excluding undesirable matter is preferable to an attempt to include any restriction in the body of the proposition. The latter method is quite likely to lead to difficulties, in the form of ambiguities and their attendant ...
Page
... method of dealing with the liquor traffic, each side may prove this point in the way which appears most effective. Each may assert that its method of control is preferable because theory and practice show it to be better for (a) social ...
... method of dealing with the liquor traffic, each side may prove this point in the way which appears most effective. Each may assert that its method of control is preferable because theory and practice show it to be better for (a) social ...
Page
... method advocated will come nearer to the goal of absolute justice than any other plan. In advocating any reform it is usually best to admit that it is not a cure-all for existent evils, but that it will remedy such evils to a greater ...
... method advocated will come nearer to the goal of absolute justice than any other plan. In advocating any reform it is usually best to admit that it is not a cure-all for existent evils, but that it will remedy such evils to a greater ...
Contents
EVIDENCE | |
CONSTRUCTING THE BRIEF | |
CONSTRUCTING THE ARGUMENT | |
REBUTTAL | |
DELIVERING THE ARGUMENT | |
THE THEORY OF ARGUMENTATION AND DEBATE | |
ARGUMENT FROM CAUSAL RELATION | |
ARGUMENT FROM ANALOGY | |
REFUTATION | |
APPENDIX B The LincolnDouglas Debate at Alton | |
Memorandum of Agreement for High School Debating | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adopted affirmative alleged cause analysis answer apply argument from analogy argument from cause argument from effect attention audience authority brief cards conclusion Congress Constitution construction Contents Declaration deductive definite delivery Democratic discussion Dred Scott decision enthymeme example exist fact fallacy fathers who framed favor Federal Government Federal Territories Harper’s Ferry hearer Henry Clay Illinois imperfect induction important income tax inductive reasoning institution of slavery interest introduction Judge Douglas Lecompton Constitution Lincoln Lincoln-Douglas Debate logical main issues major premise major term material matter means method middle term mind minor term natural monopoly Nebraska negro opinion opponent party persons point at issue political practice present principle prohibition proof proposition prove question rebuttal refutation regard Republican rules slave slavery sources of evidence speaker specific instances speech statement student syllogism tariff thing truth ultimate extinction Union United validity vote Whig words wrong