Democracy--how Direct?: Views from the Founding Era and the Polling Era

Front Cover
Elliott Abrams
Rowman & Littlefield, 2002 - Political Science - 134 pages
For more than two hundred years Americans have been debating how direct a democracy they want. Many hold that representative government too seldom reflects the people's real views, while others counter that direct popular voting will lead to excesses of passion and deficits of deliberation. In Democracy: How Direct? Elliot Abrams brings together eminent scholars to discuss the issues surrounding the dilemma of a representative versus direct democracy. This collection of previously unpublished essays begins by examining the views of our nation's founders and the historical perspectives on our democracy and then debates modern issues such as polling, public opinion, and the referendum process. With their valuable combination of historical analysis, contemporary data, and theoretical understanding, these essays will surely raise the level of the ongoing debate surrounding the nature of American democracy.

From inside the book

Selected pages

Contents

The Founders Views of Direct Democracy and Representation
1
James Madison and the Spirit of 1787
19
Lincolns View of Direct Democracy and Public Opinion
33
Beyond Referendum Democracy Competing Conceptions of Public Opinion
53
Polling and the Creation of a Virtual Public
67
Refined and Enlarged Public Opinion
82
For the People Direct Democracy in the State Constitutional Tradition
87
People Power Initiative and Referendum in the United States
101
Why Initiatives Are Necessary Some Tales from California
111
Notes
119
Index of Names
131
ABOUT THE ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2002)

Elliott Abrams, former president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, is special assistant to the President and the National Security Council's senior director for democracy, human rights, and international operations.