 Why are the people of a Territory and the people of a State therein lumped together, and their relation to the Constitution therein treated as being precisely the same? While the opinion of the court, by Chief Justice Taney, in the Dred Scott case, and...  Anti-slav Political Writings, 1833-1860 - Page 217by C. Bradley ThompsonLimited preview - About this book
 | James Washington Sheahan - Legislators - 1860 - 556 pages
...another from the beginning, and all worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the first blow was struck. It should not be overlooked that by the...the people of a state, to exclude it. Possibly this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if M'Lean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | David W. Bartlett - 1860 - 356 pages
...another from the beginning, and all worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the first blow was struck, It should not be overlooked that, by the...the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | James Washington Sheahan - Legislators - 1860 - 562 pages
...first blow was struck. It should not be overlooked that by the Nebraska Bill the people of a slate as well as Territory were to be left "perfectly free,"...the people of a state, to exclude it. Possibly this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if M'Lean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Arnold Douglas - Campaign literature - 1860 - 348 pages
...the Constitution." Why mention a State ? They were legislating for Territories, and not for or abont States. Certainly the people of a State are and ought...the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | David W. Bartlett - 1860 - 368 pages
...Constitution of the United States ; bnt why is mention of this lugged into this merely territorial law 1 Why are the people of a territory and the people of...the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | Campaign literature, 1860 - 1860 - 270 pages
...draft drawn up before the first blow was •truck. this merely Territorial law? Why are the poopje of a Territory and the people of a State therein lumped...the people of a State, to exclude It. Possibly, this ks a mere omission; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | Horace Greeley - History - 1860 - 250 pages
...United States; but why is mention of this lugged into this merely Territorial law? Why are the people ol a Territory and the people of a State therein lumped...the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | Campaign literature - 1860 - 270 pages
...was struck. this merely Territorial law* Why are the people of a Territory and the people of a Stute therein lumped together, and their relation to the...the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtís had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | Richard Josiah Hinton - Campaign literature - 1860 - 326 pages
...merely territorial law ? Why are the people of a territory and the people of a State therein Clumped together, and their relation to the Constitution therein...the people of a State to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
 | Campaign literature - 1860 - 268 pages
...of a State therein lumped together, and their relation to the Constitution therein treated as heing precisely the same ? While the opinion of the court,...the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omission ; but who can he quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion... | |
| |
