Page images



The True Reason.

THE Secession movement, | gia and the Indians for the same purpose. which took form and con- Alabama was made out of Georgia and Missistency by the action of South Carolina, sissippi territory, to increase the representaimmediately after the election of Mr. Lincoln, tion. Tennessee was set off from North was not the conception of an hour. It was Carolina for the same purpose. Florida was not the result of the election of a " sectional" | purchased of Spain, at great expense, to the President. It was not the result of wrongs inflicted upon the South by the Free States. It was not because the North had perverted the Constitution from its original intent and purposes.

It is urged, by the leaders of the movement, that these were their reasons for the attempt to dissolve the Union, and the mass of our people doubtless have regarded them as the true grounds of complaint; but, it is the merest surface view of the question. Were these the only excuses to offer for the Rebellion and all its train of blood, what a miserable pretence of justification the movement would have!

The motive which underlies all is the numerical preponderance of the North, and, under the Constitution, its ability hereafter to control the legislation of Congress by virtue of its resistless majority.


same end. Then followed a step over the Mississippi river, to appropriate territory lying to the west of the territory given to free labor by the ordinance of Mr. Jefferson; and Missouri, with her lines running as far North as the centres of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, was given up to Slavery and a Slave representation in Congress. Arkansas, ere long, was added. Then the soil fitted for Slave labor, and accessible for Slave settlement, seemed exhausted, and the South, for a while, stood still to witness the onward march of the North. Even these enormous accessions of domain scarcely served to maintain the Southern preponderance in the Government, so rapidly had the Free States grown in population, both in the old and the three new States added.

Schemes of Conquest

Thus matters stood in 1840. The census of that Each census, since 1800, year aroused the South to Purchases of new has shown that the increase renewed efforts for further extension of the of population in the North- "peculiar institution." To the North they ern, or Free States, was in a ratio soon to could not go, for soil, climate and sentiment snatch from the Slave States their almost were alike inimical to the existence of slaves unbroken control of the Government; hence in the territory of Iowa. To the West they from that time the study has been to avert could not proceed, for Government had the impending minority by the introduc- pledged that section to the Indians. Contion of new Slave States to the Union. Lou-quest alone must come to the rescue. Texas, isiana was purchased at an enormous price, an immense domain, fitted to make five not more to open the mouths of the Mis- States, must be won. The scheme of its "ansissippi than to send to Congress two Slave nexation" was soon conceived and perfected. Senators and her due quota of Representa- War was declared upon a flimsy pretext tives. Mississippi was purchased from Geor- against a weak and distracted neighbor.-One

But, the love of the Union was so strong in the hearts of a majority in the South

Fictitious Causes

hundred millions of dollars were spent, and
Texas was given over to the Slave power to
De made into States, as emergencies should
require; while New Mexico, with her bound-ern States-the disinclination to encounter
less plains, lay to the West, to await the ne- the hazards of a revolution was so apparent--
cessity for her introduction to a Slave proprie- that it became necessary for the leaders to
act with great circumspection in setting on
foot their movement for disunion. The old
themes of wrongs endured-of slaves stolen—
of unjust imposition of taxes by way of tariff
levies-of unconstitutional Personal Liberty
acts by Northern States-were augmented in
force by the evident fact that the institution
of Slavery was to be excluded from the Ter-
ritories in the West, thus seemingly denying
the rights of the South in the unsettled and
common domain; while, to crown the list of
motives for non-submission, the North had
become so far estranged and inimical to the
South as to elect a "sectional" President.
This catalogue of indignities, if properly re-
presented to the excitable and sensitive peo-
ple of the South, could not fail to answer the
ends designed; hence, separately and collec-
tively, they have been put forward as the real
causes of the uprising and of the abjuration
of the Constitution, and have been so often
and variously repeated that the original and
prime cause of the movement is almost ig-

But, even this absorbtion of an empire did not suffice. The census of 1850 again sent consternation into the "balance of power" ranks, and excited their leaders to renewed zeal. More territory must be had, at any sac- | rifice. Kansas and Nebraska alone offered the soil, but there stood the Gibraltar of Henry Clay's "Compromise Act" of 1821, guaranteeing all that region to Freedom forever. Still, the emergency was imperative. Kansas at least must be represented on the floors of Congress by a Slave delegation. The tremendous strides of the North, in Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota, threatened, by their very growth, to leap at once into an uncontrolled majority. Kansas lost, all was lost, since Texas could not, for years, gain population enough to allow of her subdivision into several States.

The repeal of the Missouri Compromise Act alone would open the Territory for Slave incursion. That repeal was made, through the co-operation of the Northern Democratic party with the South. But, the hand of Destiny seemed to interfere. The entire scheme of Southern settlement miscarried, and Kansas not only became a Free State, but the struggle to make it such called into existence the Republican party, which, in a brief period, elected its candidate to the Chief Magistracy-so fatally were the tables turned.

Dismayed at the storm created by the effort to secure Kansas, mortified at their defeat, cut off from any further extension of Slave representation, the Southern States saw before them their long-apprehended disaster of a minority in the Government. If they remained in the Union it must be as the weaker half. At this not only their pride revolted, but, as it appeared to them, their material interests forbade submission. With some hesitancy, as if feeling the way, the long contemplated scheme of Southern independence was revived and its agitation determinedly entered upon.

In contemplating the events which have transpired in the attempt to dismember the Union, it is necessary to accept the bill of complaint preferred in the various resolutions, ordinances and declarations of the seceded States' Conventions and Legislatures; but, a comprehensive understanding of the revolution can only be had by striking at the ultimate causes which originated the desire for a separate Confederacy. Even though those first causes may not be confessed nor set forth by any of the parties implicated-a confession which would concede defeat in the struggle for power-they nevertheless are readily demonstrable.

[blocks in formation]




cent. per annum. This ratio being so defini- | ulation, these three States lose four Repretively marked, rendered it an easy matter for any section to indicate, in advance, its population and consequent Congressional representation. Hence, the South, growing more slowly in population than the energetic, competitive North, discovering itself beaten in the race of numbers, sought to make up in territorial acquisition what it failed to obtain by popular increase.

In 1850 it was conclusive that the South must be cast into a minority if new acquisitions were not secured during the decade following. The attempt was made on Kansas and failed; and the South has had to witness the long threatened ascendency of the Free States in the returns and apportionment of the census of 1860, with no power to modify the result.

The Census.

To apprehend, at a glance, the particular strength of each section

of the Union, and thus to demonstrate the fact of the ascendancy of the Free States, we will classify the States, and give the Congressional representation of each, under the new apportionment rendered necessary in order to keep the number of Representatives in Congress down to 233.

[blocks in formation]

sentatives. New York alone has nearly double the free population of the six original "Seceded States," and yet she has only thirty-one Representatives to their twenty-eight. This simple fact proves how largely slaves are represented in Congress-the negroes entering into "population" in the proportion of five negroes for three in count, thus obtaining a Congressional apportionment without any of the rights of citizenship appertaining to them. If the Slave States were apportioned Representatives on their free white population alone, their representation in Congress would decrease about forty per cent; or, as Slaves are property, if the Free States were represented on property in the apportionment of three persons for every five thousand dollars, their Congressional delegations would immeasurably be increased.*

[blocks in formation]

Total... 4,721,551 7,870,896 61 4
Gain for 10 ys.3,149,345, or about 67 per cent.

[blocks in formation]

Ohio, notwithstanding her heavy gain, loses three Representatives, though the NorthWestern States collectively add nine to their delegation. Ohio alone has more free white population than the whole six States of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana; yet she has but eighteen

There is something so paradoxical in the constructive and the active relations of the Slave to the

New England, it will thus be seen, loses four members of Congress, notwithstanding her gain has been over four hundred thou-government as to excite the wonder of a foreigner. sand in population.

[blocks in formation]

Thus, by the Constitution, the principle of representation on property is forbidden, yet it gives the Slave States a representation as stated. This would seem to settle, beyond question, the fact that the Constitution does not recognize Slaves as property. Yet, here comes the decision of the United States Supreme Court, in the celebrated Dred Scott Slave Case, that Slaves are property, and property only, not men. It will be hard for a stickler for consistency to reconcile this discordance. He will have to be satisfied with the fact without understanding its

Here we have still more remarkable results. Notwithstanding the enormous increase of over one and a half million, in pop-propriety.

Representatives in Congress, while they have | New England States..

twenty-eight. Few even of our own people realize how enormous this discrepancy has been; but, figures here are incontrovertible witnesses, and prove how largely Slaves are represented in our National councils. The fact thus expressed it is necessary to weigh well in any argument which may arise on the relative favors which the Constitution bestows upon particular sections.




Middle States...

North Western States..

Pacific States...
The Free Territories..






Total pop. of Free States and Territories...19,117,911
Add loyal Slave States..

Total loyal population.....
Eleven Seceded States, disloyal...
Excess of loyal population....

These are the figures deduced from the Census re

1850. 1860. Reps. Loss. Gain. turns for 1860, prepared California.... 92,597 380,015 Oregon...... 12,294


[ocr errors]


Total......104,891 432,479 4

[ocr errors]






Gain in 10 years 326,588, or nearly 310 per cent.


[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]






Effects of the Census.

under the supervision of a Southern mah. That they are correct admits of no doubt. The results, gratifying to the North, disconcert the South, since they prove it to be helplessly in the minority. In the Union the power of the Slave States is forever gone, except, acting as a unit, they can take advantage of party divisions in the North to name certain single measures, or elect certain men; but, without a very strong co-operating party Reps. Loss.Gain. in the Free States, the Pro-Slavery propagandists are perfectly powerless to secure more soil, to command the Executive, to direct the revenues and appropriations, or to control legislation in their favor. The Constitution may be regarded by the Northern States to the letter-the Fugitive Slave Act may be enforced against every runaway negro slavethe right to Slave transit through the Free States may be conceded; but these will not avail to appease the Southern mind. The facts of their minority-that Slavery is circumscribed in the Union-that the Free soil and Free labor party is immensely in the ascendant-impelled the Southern people into the scheme for founding a pure Slave Confederacy, and no "compromise" will restore them to the Union except it be such a compromise as will abjure the old Constitution so far as to give the Slave States an equal share in the General Government at all times, an equal share in the common territory, the right of Slave transit through Free soil, the use of local officers and jails to arrest fugitives, &c., &c. Other terms than these they will not accept in peace so long as the "Southern idea" of property in man continues to influence the reason and to excite the passions of the people of the South.

324,323 111,104


Total......2,925,143 1,208,856 29

S. Carolina... 301,271 402,541





[blocks in formation]

595,097 462,230
78,686 61,753



[blocks in formation]

Alabama...... 529,164 435,132
Mississippi... 354,699 436,696
Louisiana..... 376,913 332,520
420,651 180,388


[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]



[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

If an Abolitionist be chosen President of the United States, you will have presented to you the question of whether you will permit the Government to pass into the hands of your avowed and implacable enemies? Without pausing for an answer, I will state my own position to be, that such a result would be a species of revolution by which the purposes of the Government would be destroyed, and the observ

ance of its mere forms entitled to no respect. In

that event, in such a manner as should be most ex

preme Court, under the laws, and under the people, has no power to oppress or wrong any section, and his election could afford no just cause for alarm, even if he were a Monarchist. None better knew this than the speaker quoted from above; but he, and all those who afterwards acted with him, chose to assume a fallacy as a fact, in order to aid and forward the pre-determined design of a dissolution of the Union; and the election of an "Abolitionist"-that is, any Northern man, with Northern or Freesoil principles-was to be the signal for the effort to cast off allegiance to the Constitution.

Governor Hicks, in his address to the peo

[ocr errors]

ple of Maryland, said: “We are told by the leading spirits of the South Carolina Convenpedient, I should deem it your duty to provide for tion, that, neither the election of Mr. Lincoln, your safety outside of the Union, with those who nor the non-execution of the Fugitive Slave have already shown the will, and would have ac-law, nor both combined, constitute their quired the power, to deprive you of your birthright, grievances. They declare that the real cause and to reduce you to worse than the Colonial dependence of your fathers."

If an 66

[ocr errors]

Southern View of


of their discontent dates as far back as 1833." We shall give the South Carolina Declaration The sentiment, it will be seen, covered the of Causes, in its proper order in this History, whole ground of the right and propriety of a and quote from Governor Hicks, to show how secession from the Union. "If an Abolition- a Southerner, not a Secessionist, viewed and ist be chosen President," proves that the con-understood the movement. Mr. Davis, in his tingency of a Northern triumph was appre-address to the Senate, (January 21st,) after hended, and what follows indicates the line arguing that the equality spoken of in the of argument to be pursued before the people | Declaration of Independin justification of the movement for a dissolu-ence was the equality of a tion of the Confederacy. Abolition- class of political rights, said: ist" had not been elected? Probably the But we have proclaimed our independence. contemplated movement would not have been This is done with no hostility or any desire made in 1860, as the right pretext would have to injure any section of the country, nor even been wanting with which to go before the for our pecuniary benefit, but from the high people. Not that the election of any Presi- and solid foundation of defending and prodent could in any way change the Constitu- tecting the rights we inherited, and transtion, could control Congress, could affect that mitting them unshorn to our posterity." bulwark of our institutions, the United States Supreme Court, could deprive any State, or any people, or any man of a birth-right:-the President being the mere temporary head of the nation, under Congress, under the Su

As the Declaration, in his view, secured only a class of political rights, the succeeding avowal that the step of secession was taken "from the high and solid foundation of defending and protecting the rights we inherited," &c.

« PreviousContinue »