No Party Now: Politics in the Civil War NorthDuring the Civil War, Northerners fought each other in elections with almost as much zeal as they fought Southern rebels on the battlefield. Yet politicians and voters alike claimed that partisanship was dangerous in a time of national crisis. In No Party Now, Adam I. P. Smith challenges the prevailing view that political processes in the North somehow helped the Union be more stable and effective in the war. Instead, Smith argues, early efforts to suspend party politics collapsed in the face of divisions over slavery and the purpose of the war. At the same time, new contexts for political mobilization, such as the army and the avowedly non-partisan Union Leagues, undermined conventional partisan practices. The administration's supporters soon used the power of anti-party discourse to their advantage by connecting their own antislavery arguments to a powerful nationalist ideology. By the time of the 1864 election they sought to de-legitimize partisan opposition with slogans like "No Party Now But All For Our Country!" No Party Now offers a reinterpretation of Northern wartime politics that challenges the "party period paradigm" in American political history and reveals the many ways in which the unique circumstances of war altered the political calculations and behavior of politicians and voters alike. As Smith shows, beneath the superficial unity lay profound differences about the implications of the war for the kind of nation that the United States was to become. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 58
Page vii
... argue in this book that only by appreciating the tension created by “normal” partisan conflict amid a yearning for consensus can we understand the way in which the critical questions of wartime politics played out. Foremost among these was.
... argue in this book that only by appreciating the tension created by “normal” partisan conflict amid a yearning for consensus can we understand the way in which the critical questions of wartime politics played out. Foremost among these was.
Page 4
... argued, participation in nineteenth-century American elections was a signifier of citizenship and an expression of community identity—in other words, if on some level, it was always about nationhood—then the Civil War raised the stakes ...
... argued, participation in nineteenth-century American elections was a signifier of citizenship and an expression of community identity—in other words, if on some level, it was always about nationhood—then the Civil War raised the stakes ...
Page 6
... arguments and will argue that an antiparty discourse was critical to the process. Through the mechanism of purportedly nonpartisan organizations like the Loyal Publication Society, elite Republicans tried to construct an ideal ...
... arguments and will argue that an antiparty discourse was critical to the process. Through the mechanism of purportedly nonpartisan organizations like the Loyal Publication Society, elite Republicans tried to construct an ideal ...
Page 7
... argued that abolitionists had to share some of the blame for the crisis. Conservatives were the swing voters of the Civil War. Some became fervent supporters of emancipation on the grounds that it was the only way to win the war; others ...
... argued that abolitionists had to share some of the blame for the crisis. Conservatives were the swing voters of the Civil War. Some became fervent supporters of emancipation on the grounds that it was the only way to win the war; others ...
Page 9
... argued that “the old system [of parties] has failed, and we should profit by the failure for our future guidance.”3 Historians have conventionally argued that party political competition contributed to political stability and aided the ...
... argued that “the old system [of parties] has failed, and we should profit by the failure for our future guidance.”3 Historians have conventionally argued that party political competition contributed to political stability and aided the ...
Contents
3 | |
9 | |
2 The Patriotic Imperative | 25 |
3 The Emancipation Proclamation and the Party System | 49 |
4 The Union Leagues and the Emergence of Antiparty Nationalism | 67 |
5 The Army Loyalty and Dissent | 85 |
6 Slavery Reconstruction and the Union Party | 101 |
7 Emancipation and Antiparty Nationalism in the 1864 Election Campaign | 124 |
Conclusion | 154 |
Notes | 167 |
Bibliography | 223 |
Index | 259 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham Lincoln administration American appeal argued army August battle Boston Brooklyn Daily Eagle called campaign candidate cause Charles Chicago citizens City Civil Civil War claim Club Collection Committee Congressional Connecticut conservative Constitution convention crisis culture Daily Democratic Party Democrats Division draft editor effect efforts election electoral emancipation example explained former George Henry History Illinois issue James John July June leaders leading letter Lincoln Papers Loyal loyalty majority March McClellan means meeting military newspaper nominated North Northern November October Ohio opposed opposition organization partisan partisanship patriotic peace Pennsylvania Philadelphia platform political politicians President presidential quoted radical rebel rebellion reported Representatives republic Republican Party rhetoric September Seward slavery Society soldiers South Southern speech tion Union League Union Party Unionists United University Press victory vote voters warned wartime Whigs wrote York