Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney: Slavery, Secession, and the President's War PowersThe clashes between President Abraham Lincoln and Chief Justice Roger B. Taney over slavery, secession, and the president's constitutional war powers went to the heart of Lincoln's presidency. James Simon, author of the acclaimed What Kind of Nation -- an account of the battle between President Thomas Jefferson and Chief Justice John Marshall to define the new nation -- brings to vivid life the passionate struggle during the worst crisis in the nation's history, the Civil War. The issues that underlaid that crisis -- race, states' rights, and the president's wartime authority -- resonate today in the nation's political debate. Lincoln and Taney's bitter disagreements began with Taney's Dred Scott opinion in 1857, when the chief justice declared that the Constitution did not grant the black man any rights that the white man was bound to honor. In the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates, Lincoln attacked the opinion as a warped judicial interpretation of the Framers' intent and accused Taney of being a member of a pro-slavery national conspiracy. In his first inaugural address, President Lincoln insisted that the South had no legal right to secede. Taney, who administered the oath of office to Lincoln, believed that the South's secession was legal and in the best interests of both sections of the country. Once the Civil War began, Lincoln broadly interpreted his constitutional powers as commander in chief to prosecute the war, suspending the writ of habeas corpus, censoring the mails, and authorizing military courts to try civilians for treason. Taney opposed every presidential wartime initiative and openly challenged Lincoln's suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. He accused the president of assuming dictatorial powers in violation of the Constitution. Lincoln ignored Taney's protest, convinced that his actions were both constitutional and necessary to preserve the Union. Almost 150 years after Lincoln's and Taney's deaths, their words and actions reverberate in constitutional debate and political battle. Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney tells their dramatic story in fascinating detail. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 69
Page
... democratic republic.” —Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. “Here—with apologies to Doris Kearns Goodwin—is the story of rivals who never played on the same team. Yet, as Simon skillfully shows, their mutual antipathy had a dramatic impact on the ...
... democratic republic.” —Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. “Here—with apologies to Doris Kearns Goodwin—is the story of rivals who never played on the same team. Yet, as Simon skillfully shows, their mutual antipathy had a dramatic impact on the ...
Page 2
... Democrat Andrew Jackson in 1828. Like Jackson, Taney was suspicious of vested corporate interests. After Jackson was elected president, he appointed Taney to be his Attorney General and, later, Secretary of the Treasury. Together ...
... Democrat Andrew Jackson in 1828. Like Jackson, Taney was suspicious of vested corporate interests. After Jackson was elected president, he appointed Taney to be his Attorney General and, later, Secretary of the Treasury. Together ...
Page 14
... Democrat, was wildly popular in the western and southern states. Taney took a leadership role in Jackson's campaign in Maryland, which, as a border state, was the scene of furious activity by both presidential camps. Although Maryland's ...
... Democrat, was wildly popular in the western and southern states. Taney took a leadership role in Jackson's campaign in Maryland, which, as a border state, was the scene of furious activity by both presidential camps. Although Maryland's ...
Page 21
... Democrats as a tool of the National Bank and other vested corporate interests, while Jackson was seen by the ... Democratic principles, but also for his own resolute opposition “A Moonlight Mind” 21.
... Democrats as a tool of the National Bank and other vested corporate interests, while Jackson was seen by the ... Democratic principles, but also for his own resolute opposition “A Moonlight Mind” 21.
Page 22
... democratic government. With Taney's strong support, Jackson attacked the bank's economic base by removing all federal government deposits and having them redistributed to selected state banks. The president instructed his new Treasury ...
... democratic government. With Taney's strong support, Jackson attacked the bank's economic base by removing all federal government deposits and having them redistributed to selected state banks. The president instructed his new Treasury ...
Contents
1 | |
Chapter Two My Politics Are Short and Sweet | 45 |
Chapter Three The Monstrous Injustice of Slavery | 76 |
Chapter Four Dred Scott | 98 |
Chapter Five The Better Angels of Our Nature | 133 |
Epilogue | 269 |
Acknowledgments | 287 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abolitionist Abraham Lincoln administration’s AL’s American anti-slavery argued argument army Attorney authority Baltimore bank blockade Booth Buchanan campaign challenge Charles River Bridge Chase Chief Justice Taney circuit court civil Clay coln Confederacy Confederate confidence conflict Cong Congress constitutional Court decision courtroom Curtis Curtis’s debate declared defended Democrats Douglas Douglas’s Dred Scott decision Dred Scott opinion election emancipation federal government field final first five framers free blacks Frémont Fugitive Slave Law Grier habeas corpus Ibid Illinois issue Jackson John judge judicial Justice’s Kansas-Nebraska Act Kentucky later legislation legislature Marshall Maryland McClellan McLean Merryman military Missouri Compromise nation North northern office officers official Ohio Party party’s political president presidential pro-slavery proclamation Republican Senate Seward slaveowners slavery South southern speech Springfield state’s statute Taney Court Taney wrote Taney’s opinion territories tion troops U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional Union United Vallandigham victory Virginia vote Webster Whig writ of habeas York