 the judgment of a state court should have the same credit, validity and effect in every other court in the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon in such state, and none...  The Monthly Law Reporter - Page 3121856Full view - About this book
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1816 - 786 pages
...A judgment of a state court has the same credit, validity, and effect, in every other court within the United States, which it had in the state where it was rendered ; and whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon in such state, and none others, can be... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1818 - 712 pages
...as that of Mills v. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish th« two cases. The doctrine there held was that the judgment of a state court should have the...credit, validity and effect, in every other court of the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1818 - 712 pages
...as that of Mills v. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held was that the judgment of a state court should have the...credit, validity and effect, in every other court of the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would... | |
 | Maryland. Court of Appeals, Richard W. Gill, John Johnson, Richard Wordsworth Gill - Law reports, digests, etc - 1838 - 572 pages
...that of Miles vs. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held, was, that the judgment of a State court should have the...whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon in such State, and none others, could be pleaded in any other court in the United States. Chancellor Kent,... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court, George Noble Stewart - Law reports, digests, etc - 1832 - 558 pages
...«3Wh«a. 5J4 to recognise the former doctrine, said that it was held in the case of Mills v. Duryee "that the judgment of a State Court should have the same credit, validity and efft'ct, in every other Court in the United States, which it hnd in the State where it was pronounced... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1843 - 598 pages
...The doctrine there Rubber Fac'j ' held was, that the judgment of a state court should have Holt. ' the same credit, validity and effect, in every other...the United States, which it had in the state where pro' nounced, and that whatever pleas would be good in a suit • thereon, in such state, and none... | |
 | Benjamin Lynde Oliver - Forms (Law) - 1851 - 676 pages
...taken. The settled construction of this section of the act is, that the judgment of a state courf shall have the same credit, validity, and effect in every...the United States, which it had in the" state where proniunced ; and that, whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon in such state, and none other,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1854 - 650 pages
...cases. The doctrine there held, was that the judgment of a State Court should have the same faith, validity and effect, in every other Court in the United...where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would bo good to a suit thereon in such State, and none others, could be pleaded in any other Court in the... | |
 | Asa Kinne - Courts - 1852 - 736 pages
...that the judgment of a stale court shall have the same Credit, validity, and effect, in any state, which it had in the state where it was pronounced ; and that whatever pleas would be good in a suit thereon in such state, and no others, can be pleaded in any court in the United States. —... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - Law reports, digests, etc - 1856 - 858 pages
...that of Mills vs. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held was, that the judgment of a State court should have the...effect in every other court in the United States which iff had in the same where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon... | |
| |
