Page images
PDF
EPUB

ruffians.

Those from the free States generally went as permanent settlers, with their families; but many went in from the slave States, merely to take part in the disturbances, and aid in establishing slavery. This was especially The border the case with a class of Missourians, who could at any time cross the Kansas border, commit depredations, vote at elections, and then retreat across the border, undisturbed. These invaders were commonly called "Border Ruffians." At one time they stopped the navigation of the Missouri River for all free State settlers, compelling all these to take a tedious overland journey

[graphic][merged small]

through Iowa. The United States officials supported, sometimes the one party, and sometimes the other, finally inclining towards the slaveholders; while governor after governor were sent from Washington, and resigned in despair. Two separate governments were organized by the settlers, and two separate codes of The strug law adopted. Actual fighting began at last. The Kansas. free State military leaders - Lane, Montgomery, and organized bands to defend their settlements; and Capt. John Brown took an especially daring part in the defence. At Ossawattomie, for instance, he defended himself, with sixteen men, against several

others

[ocr errors]

gle in

The Gadsden

hundred marauders from Missouri; his little band killing and wounding more than four times their own number, and losing but two men. The same invaders sacked and burned the flourishing village of Lawrence, lately settled by men from Massachusetts. Many families in Kansas were reduced to poverty during this period, or lived by taking horses and cattle belonging to those of the other party; so that men would speak of a proslavery horse or an antislavery cow, according as the owner of these animals belonged to either side. At last the establishment of freedom was secured in Nebraska and Kansas, but at a great cost of suffering and hatred.

A more peaceful event of President Pierce's adminpurchase. istration was a purchase of territory called the "Gadsden Purchase," from the name of the minister who negotiated it. When the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was made, at the close of the Mexican War, it was founded on an inaccurate map; and this afterwards led to a dispute about the New Mexican boundary. To settle the dispute, the United States bought of Mexico (Dec. 30, 1853) a part of the Territories now known as Arizona and New Mexico, for ten million dollars. This purchase included about forty-five thousand square miles, and brought the whole territorial extent of the United States (in 1854) up to nearly three million square miles (2,981,701). This was nearly four times the area of the original thirteen States, and far larger than that of the famous Roman empire in its greatest days.

Treaty of
Japan.

Another important event that occurred in the time of President Pierce was a treaty with Japan, negotiated March 21, 1854, by Commodore Matthew C. Perry,

brother of the hero of Lake Erie. Before this time Japan had rigidly excluded from its ports all foreigners, except about a dozen Dutch traders, and had allowed shipwrecked seamen to be treated with the greatest cruelty. Commodore Perry with an American squadron compelled the Japanese to show more consideration for foreigners in distress; and his treaty secured the removal of almost all restrictions on commerce with Japan.

tion of the

The new party opposed to the extension of slavery The elec had now reached such strength, that the Whig party fifteenth had gradually disappeared; and the next presidential president. election lay mainly between the Republican party, as the new organization styled itself, and the old Democratic party. There was, however, a temporary party, composed of those who called themselves "Know Nothings," and aimed mainly to oppose foreign influence in national legislation. This party carried but one State, Maryland; and the Democratic candidate, James Buchanan of Pennsylvania, was elected president. His administration (1857-1861) will always be remembered as that in which the great civil war, or "War of the Rebellion," arose.

The Dred

Scott

decision.

John

Brown in
Virginia.

John

Brown's raid.

CHAPTER XXX.

THE OPENING OF THE CIVIL WAR.

MR

[blocks in formation]

R. BUCHANAN'S inauguration took place on March 4, 1857, and that very year the Supreme Court pronounced a decision called the "Dred Scott Decision," declaring the right of slaveholders to take their slaves with them into any part of the country. This made a great excitement throughout the free States; and something else soon happened, which excited the slave States almost as much. This was what is commonly called "John Brown's Raid." Capt. John Brown's name has been already mentioned in describing the resistance of the "Free State" settlers of Kansas to the "Border Ruffians" of Missouri. After order was restored in Kansas, John Brown resolved to fulfil a plan he had long formed for resisting slavery in the slave States themselves. In his youth he had been familiar with the mountains of Virginia, and had there visited places which, as he used to say, had evidently been created to be the stronghold for fugitive slaves. General Washington, long before him, had formed a plan to take the American army into these mountains, should the colonies be defeated; and John Brown proposed to do the same with an army of blacks. So, having collected a small body of men near Harper's

Ferry, Va., he entered and took possession of the town,

the United

Oct. 16, 1859. He at once seized the United States He seizes Arsenal, intending thus to secure arms for the fugitive slaves whom he meant to summon to his side.

He frankly announced his object to be the freedom of the slaves; and he promised safety to all property, except slave-property. He had in all but twenty-two

States

arsenal.

[graphic][merged small]

men; but so great was the alarm produced by these, that several eye-witnesses reported the number to be three hundred; and this estimate was at once telegraphed to all parts of the Union. With this small number he took many of the chief inhabitants of the town as hostages for the safety of those under his command. Wishing to spare all unnecessary alarm to the

« PreviousContinue »