Page images
PDF
EPUB

United States vs. Meinel & Wimple, Inc., (D. C.) 256 F. 396.

United States vs. Oglesby Gro. Co. 263 F. 691, reversed in 255 U. S. 108, 255 U. S. 90.

United States vs. Steene, (D. C.) 263 F. 160.

United States Trust Co. vs. Miller, 262 U. S. 58, 43 Sup. Ct. 489, 67 L. Ed. 545.

United States vs. Welsh (D. C.) 247 F. 239; also, 250 F. 309; affirmed (CCA.) in Welsh vs. U. S., 267 F. 819; certiorari denied, in 254 U. S. 637.

United States vs. Van Workhoven, (D. C.) 250 F. 311.
Walter S. Field vs. Miller, A. P. C., Stinnes, Jenson, et. al.,

[merged small][ocr errors]

Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall. 447, 19 L. Ed. 207.

Watts, Watts & Co. vs. Unione Austriaca di Navigatione, (D. C.) 224 F. 188, affirmed in (CCA.) 229 F. 136, 143 CCA. 418 and 248 U. S. 9.

Weisman vs. U. S. (D. C.) 271 F. 944.

Welsh vs. U. S., 250 F. 309, affirmed in (CCA.) 267 F. 819. Welsh vs. U. S., (CCA.) 267 F. 819, affirming 247 F. 239 and 250 F. 309.

Whalen Paper & Pulp Mills vs. Davis, (D. C.) 288 F. 438.
Willis vs. Ellett, 9 Wall. 740.

Wilson vs. Miller, 274 F. 983.

Wirth vs. Wirth (D. C.) 286 F. 289.

W. S. Tyler vs. Deutsche Dampfshifffaharts Gesellschaft, (D. C.) 276 F. 134.

Alabama

Arizona

California

Colorado

Illinois

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisana

Maryland

STATE CASES DIGESTED

Lutz vs. Van Hanegan, 202 Ala. 234, 80
So. 72.

Gardanier vs. Celada, 24 Ariz. 185, 207
Pac. 875.

Superior & Pittsburgh Copper Co. vs.
Davidovich, 19 Ariz. 402, 171 Pac. 127.
Henrich's Estate, 180 Cal. 175, 179 Pac.
883.

In Re. Bosse Estate, 185 Cal. 666.
Taylor vs. Albion Lumber Co., 176 Cal.
347, 168 Pac. 348.

Estates of Martin Prossinger, et. al. (un-
reported), but opinion cited in part 2,
section 7, note 23, p. 168.

Busche vs. Schutte, 216 Ills. App. 212.
Chapman vs. Northern Trust Co. 219 Ills.
App. 492.

Dickenson vs. Belden, 108 N. E. 1011,
Ills. ―.

Moore vs. Brandenburg, 93 N. E. 733.

Bruer vs. Beery, 189 N. W. 717.
Kielsmarks Will, 188 Iowa 1378.
Weiditschka vs. Tent of Maccabees, 188
Iowa 183, 170 N. W. 300.

Wolf vs. Cudahy Packing Co. (Kan.) 182
Pac. 395.

Garrett D. Ripley vs. Waldemar Conrad
Von Zeidwitz, (Ken.)-Ky.—

Rau vs. Rowe, 184 Ken. 841, 213 S. W. 226.
Held vs. Goldsmith, (La.) 96 So. Rep. 272.

Nooman vs. Kemp, 34 Md. 73.
Pope vs. Williams, 98 Md. 59, 103 Am. St.
Rep. 379.

Michigan

Nebraska

New Jersey

New York

Kneeland Bigelow Co. vs. Mich. Cen. Ry.
207 Mich. 546, 174 N. W. 605.
Mittlestadt vs. Kelly, 202 Mich. 524.
Palmer vs. Poporny, 217 Mich. 284; 186
N. W. 505.

Powell vs. Pennoch, 148 N. W. 430.

Metzger vs. Metzger, 108 Neb. 613.
Thiedes Estate, 102 Neb. 747, 165 N. W.
435.

Heiler vs. Goodman Motor, Van & Sto. Co.,
92 N. J. 415, 105 Atl. 233.

Posselt vs. D'Espard, 87 N. J. 571, 100
Atl. 893.

Kappelman vs. Palmer, 89 N. J. Eq. 390,
105 Atl. 140.

Kappelman vs. Kappelman, 91 N. J. Eq.
67, 108 Atl. 432; certiorari denied in
252 U. S. 581.

[ocr errors]

Tortoriella vs. Seghorn, N. J. Eq. —,
103 Atl. 393.

Amsincks Estate, 103 Misc. Rep. 124, 169
N. Y. S. 336.

Arndt-Ober vs. Metropolitan Opera Co.,

169 N. Y. S. 304, 102 App. Div. 513,
modifying 169 N. Y. S. 944.

Atlantic Communication Co. vs. Zimmer-
man, 170 N. Y. S. 275, 182 App. Div.
862.

Bangs Estate, 167 N. Y. S. 256, 101 Misc.
Rep. 495.

Cohn vs. Gismond, 197 N. Y. S. 41, 203
App. Div. 453.

Dunn's Estate, 39 App. Div. 510.

Erdreich vs. Zimmerman, 107 Misc. Rep.

508, 176 N. Y. S. 762; reversed in 179
N. Y. S. 829, 190 App. Div. 443.

Fritz Schutze vs. Raimes & Co., 100 Misc.

Rep. 697, 166 N. Y. S. 567, affirming
164 N. Y. S. 454, 99 Misc. Rep. 626.
Goldsmuntz vs. Spitzel, 170 N. Y. S. 467.
Guinness vs. Phoenix Ins. Co. of London,
Ltd., 188 N. Y. S. 137, 196 App. Div.
495.

Gruger Estate, 36 Misc. Rep. 477, 73 N. Y.
S. 812.

Hughes vs. Techt, 106 Misc. Rep. 524, 176
N. Y. S. 356, affirmed in 177 N. Y. S.
420, which was affirmed in Techt vs.
Hughes, 188 App. Div. 743, 229 N. Y.
222.

Hughes' Estate, 95 N. Y. 56.

Handel's Estate, 106 Misc. Rep. 417, 176
N. Y. S. 262.

Hungarian Credit Bank vs. Titus, 169 N.
Y. S. 926, 175 App. Div. 504; see, 161
N. Y. S. 1076, 182 App. Div. 826.

In Re. Schaefer, 182 N. Y. S. 732, 180
N. Y. S. 638, 110 Misc. Rep. 628, 112
Misc. Rep. 308.

Insurance Co. of Penn. vs. Prussian Nat.
Ins. Co., 184 N. Y. S. 103, 112 Misc.
Rep. 199.

Jurgenson's Estate, 176 N. Y. S. 262.
Kannangreisser vs. Isrealowitz, 107 Misc.
Rep. 349, 176 N. Y. S. 535.

Kuntsche Estate, 114 Misc. Rep. 694, 187
N. Y. S. 245; affirmed in 192 N. Y. S.
933.

Mass vs. German Sav. Bank, etc., 176 N.
Y. 377.

Noble vs. Great Am. Ins. Co., 194 N. Y. S.
60, 200 App. Div. 773; affirmed in 235
N. Y. 589.

Nord Deutsche Ins. Co. vs. Dudley, Jr.,
et. al., 169 N. Y. S. 303, affirmed in
same vs. King, 169 N. Y. S. 1106; also,
104 Misc. Rep. 365, 172 N. Y. S. 154.
Otto Biesantz vs. Sup. Council Royal Ar-
canum, 106 Misc. Rep. 545, 175 N. Y.
S. 46; cited with approval in Garvan
vs. Marconi Tel. Co., 275 F. 489.
Panee vs. Solar, 167 N. Y. S. 901, 101
Misc. Rep. 693.

Parsons vs. Lyman, 20 N. Y. 112.

People vs. Platte, 20 Hun. 495, 3 N. Y. S.
367.

Pommers Estate, 177 N. Y. S. 746, 108
Misc. Rep. 491.

Pub. Service Commission vs. N. Y. Cen-
tral Ry., 185 N. Y. S. 267, 193 App.
Div. 615, affirmed in 230 N. Y. 149.
Roeck's Estate, 195 N. Y. S. 505, 119 Misc.
Rep. 190; affirmed in 200 N. Y. S. 917.
Rothbarth vs. Heizfeld, 167 N. Y. S. 199,
179 App. Div. 865; reversing order in
166 N. Y. S. 744, 100 Misc. Rep. 470-
also, 223 N. Y. S. 578.

Rubber Co. vs. Kalter, 172 N. Y. S. 486.
Schulter vs. Bowery Savings Bank, 117
N. Y. S. 125.

Schutte vs. Raimes & Co., 100 Misc. Rep.
697, 166 N. Y. S. 567, affirming 164
N. Y. S. 459, 99 Misc. Rep. 625.
Siemond vs. Schmidt, 168 N. Y. S. 935.
Streb vs. Chatham & Phoenix Nat. Bank,
108 Misc. Rep. 368, 178 N. Y. S. 309.
Techt vs. Hughes, 188 App. Div. 743, 229 ·
N. Y. 222, affirming 177 N. Y. S. 420;
certiorari denied in 254 U. S. 643, 41
Sup. Ct. 14.

Vorhaus vs. City Nat. Securities Co., 167
N. Y. S. 736; affirmed in 169 N. Y. S.
1118.

« PreviousContinue »