Political Numeracy: Mathematical Perspectives on Our Chaotic Constitution

Front Cover
W. W. Norton & Company, 2002 - Mathematics - 287 pages

From the impossibility of a perfectly democratic vote to a clarifying model for affirmative action debates, constitutional law professor and math enthusiast Michael Meyerson "provides an engaging and unusual perspective on the no-man's land between mathematics and the law" (John Allen Paulos). In thoroughly accessible and entertaining terms, Meyerson shows how the principle of probability influenced the outcomes of the O. J. Simpson trials; makes a convincing case for the mathematical virtues of the electoral college; uses game theory to explain the federal government's shifting balance of power; relates the concept of infinity to the heated abortion debate; and uses topology and chaos theory to explain how our Constitution has successfully survived social and political change.

From inside the book

Selected pages

Contents

Acknowledgments
9
Preface
11
The Ugliest Number in the Constitution
16
Logic Healthy and Ill
23
Majority Rules
48
The Positive Value of Consensus
71
The First Veto
82
What Does Equality Equal?
91
Infinity and the Constitution
148
The Incomplete Constitution
162
Constitutional Chaos
185
The Mathematics of Limits
209
The Limits of Mathematics
217
Notes
223
Permissions
277
Index
279

Game Theory and the Constitution
109
Multidimensional Thinking
125

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2002)

Michael Meyerson is professor of law and Piper & Marbury Faculty Fellow at the University of Baltimore School of Law. He lives in Columbia, Maryland.

Bibliographic information