What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action agency Amendment apply argued Assn Attorney authority basis benefits Board BRENNAN brief C. A. 5th Cir California cause Certiorari denied charges Circuit claim Clause Commission communications compensation complaint concern concluded Congress consideration considered constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal decide decision defendant determination dismissed dissenting District Court effect employees equal ET AL evidence facts federal filed final finding Florida Georgia Government granted hearing held holding Illinois increase industry interest issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE Labor legislative limitations litigation material ment Michigan Minnesota Motion noted October officers Opinion parties permit person petition petitioner practice present prisoner procedural proceedings protection provides question railroad reason record Relations Reported respondent result reversed rule sentence standard statute supra Supreme Court tion trial United violation York
Page 179 - When the classification in such a law is called in question, if any state of facts reasonably can be conceived that would sustain it, the existence of that state of facts at the time the law was enacted must be assumed. 4. One who assails the classification in such a law must carry the burden of showing that it does not rest upon any reasonable basis, but is essentially arbitrary.
Page 133 - The underlying idea, one that is deeply ingrained in at least the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence, is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for an alleged offense, thereby subjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and compelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and insecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.
Page xxxv - Accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.
Page 172 - A classification having some reasonable basis does not offend against that clause merely because it is not made with mathematical nicety or because in practice it results in some inequality.
Page 15 - ... it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.
Page 45 - First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose: second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion: , , , finally, the statute must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion...
Page 60 - A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.
Page 2 - Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act or acts sought to be restrained...