Great Debates in American History: State rights (1798-1861); slavery (1858-1861) |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 55
Page 28
If we suppose the case of such conflicting legislation sustained by the corresponding executive and judicial authorities , patriotism and philanthropy turn their eyes from the condition in which the parties would be placed , and from ...
If we suppose the case of such conflicting legislation sustained by the corresponding executive and judicial authorities , patriotism and philanthropy turn their eyes from the condition in which the parties would be placed , and from ...
Page 43
In the year 1821 he expressed himself in this emphatic manner : " It is a fatal heresy to suppose that either our State governments are superior to the Federal or the Federal to the State ; neither is authorized literally to decide ...
In the year 1821 he expressed himself in this emphatic manner : " It is a fatal heresy to suppose that either our State governments are superior to the Federal or the Federal to the State ; neither is authorized literally to decide ...
Page 47
And one would suppose that his object , in this reference to Massachusetts , was to find a precedent to justify proceedings in the South , were it not for the reproach and contumely with which he labors , all along , to load these ...
And one would suppose that his object , in this reference to Massachusetts , was to find a precedent to justify proceedings in the South , were it not for the reproach and contumely with which he labors , all along , to load these ...
Page 53
Let us suppose the State of South Carolina to express the same opinion by the voice of her legislature . That would be very imposing ; but what then ? Is the voice of one State conclusive ? It so happens that , at the very moment when ...
Let us suppose the State of South Carolina to express the same opinion by the voice of her legislature . That would be very imposing ; but what then ? Is the voice of one State conclusive ? It so happens that , at the very moment when ...
Page 56
Who did the venerable Connecticut Senator suppose was to decide that question ? The State legislatures ? Certainly not . No such sentiment ever escaped his lips . Let us follow up , sir , this New England opposition to the embargo laws ...
Who did the venerable Connecticut Senator suppose was to decide that question ? The State legislatures ? Certainly not . No such sentiment ever escaped his lips . Let us follow up , sir , this New England opposition to the embargo laws ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
admit adopted amendment answer appeal attempt authority become believe better bill Brown cause charge citizens compact Congress Constitution convention course Court danger decide decision Democratic party deny desire doctrine Douglas duty election equal established execution exercise existence expressed fact fathers favor Federal Government feeling force give hand held hold honorable hope House institutions interest John Judge laws legislation legislature liberty limits Lincoln live look majority means meet never North Northern object opinion party passed peace platform political present preserve President principle propose protection question reason regard representatives Republican resistance resolutions secession secure Senator sentiment slave slavery South Carolina Southern sovereign speech stand suppose Territories thing tion true understand Union United violation Virginia vote whole