But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in which it is asserted, as if a marshal of the United States, under an execution in favor of the United States against A, should seize the person or property of B, (d) then the state courts have jurisdiction... The New-York Legal Observer - Page 183edited by - 1845Full view - About this book
| James Kent - Law - 1832 - 590 pages
...matter, then the inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in which it it asserted, as if a marshal of the United States, under an execution in favour of the United States... | |
| James Kent - Law - 1851 - 706 pages
...matter, then the inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in...marshal of the United States, under an execution in favour of the United States against A., should seize the person or property of B.,c then the state... | |
| James Kent - Law - 1858 - 732 pages
...matter, then the inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in...against A., should seize the person or property of B., (d) then the state courts have jurisdiction to protect the person, and the property so illegally invaded;... | |
| James Kent - Law - 1860 - 748 pages
...subject-matter, then the inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in which it it is asserted, as if a marshal of the United States, under an execution in favor of the United States... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1861 - 704 pages
...subject-matter, then the inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the Federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in...should seize the person or property of B, then the Freeman v. Howe et al. State courts have jurisdiction to protect the person and the property so illegally... | |
| Alabama. Supreme Court, John Wesley Shepherd - Alabama - 1864 - 806 pages
...subject-maUer, then the inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the Federal courts. But, if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in which it is asserted — aa if a marshal of the United States, under an execution in favor of the United States against... | |
| James Kent - Law - 1866 - 724 pages
...subject-matter, then the- inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in...against A, should seize the person or property of B, (d) then the state courts have jurisdiction to protect the person and the property so illegally invaded... | |
| James Kent - Law - 1866 - 722 pages
...subject-matter, then the- inquiry into the validity of the seizure belongs exclusively to the federal courts. But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in...execution in favor of the United States against A, should scize the person or property of B, (d) then the state courts have jurisdiction to protect the person... | |
| Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1866 - 726 pages
...interrupt by replevin, injunction or otherwise, the exercise of the authority of federal officers, adds : "But if there be no jurisdiction in the instance in...asserted, as if a marshal of the United States, under a process in favor of the United States against A., should seize the, property of B., then the State... | |
| |