| Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1876 - 854 pages
...evidence is admissible, and the court should have excluded it. This was error, and we think, also, that the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. The plea of accord and satisfaction was sustained -by the clear weight and preponderance of the evidence,... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1882 - 686 pages
...judgment was rendered upon the finding. There is but one assignment of error made, and that is, the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial assigned the following reasons : "1st. That the court erred in admitting in evidence the testimony... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1214 pages
...Appellant also contends that the court erred in rejecting the evidence of one JW Goodwin in support of appellant's motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial was filed and served on defendants March 26, 1917. The affidavit was not served on respondents until... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1332 pages
...county court of Milam county, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial, and in not setting aside the verdict and Judgment rendered and entered, changing the venue of... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 690 pages
...assignment of error alleging its insufficiency. Harris v. State, ex rel., 123 Ind. 272. It is next contended that the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. The court assessed appellee's damages at $50, and it is insisted by appellant that there is no allegation... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 792 pages
...the part of Lydia A. Finch, but it could not be granted on motion of appellant, unless his pleadings or the evidence or finding of the jury showed him...court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new Marsh v. Morris et al. trial. The motion for a new trial begins as follows : " Comes now the defendant,... | |
| Indiana. Appellate Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 800 pages
...has not been injured by this ruling. Knight, Administrator, v. Knight. The fifth error complained of is that the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. Numerous causes are assigned why a new trial should have been granted. Before proceeding to... | |
| Indiana. Appellate Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 786 pages
...not argued the first and second errors assigned, they are waived. The third error assigned is "The court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial." The motion embraces the following reasons for which a new trial was asked, viz: "First. That the evidence wholly... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1895 - 776 pages
...Marshall Petitt, for costs. From this judgmeilt she prosecutes her appeal. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial. Four separate reasons are stated in the motion therefor. Of these appellees' counsel have discussed... | |
| |