Page images
PDF
EPUB

CONFISCATION-EMANCIPATION.

insurrectionary purposes by persons engaged in rebellion or forcible resistance to the Government; and Mr. Trumbull, of Ill., moved the fol lowing amendment:

"And be it further enacted, That whenever any person, claiming to be entitled to the service or labor of any other person, under the laws of any State, shall employ such person in aiding or promoting any insurrection, or in resisting the laws of the United States, or shall permit him to be so employed, he shall forfeit all right to such service or labor, and the person whose labor or service is thus claimed shall be thenceforth discharged therefrom-any law to the contrary notwithstanding."

This proposition was advocated by Mr. Ten Eyck, of N. J., who had opposed it two days before, in Committee, but who now urged its passage on the assumption that slaves had been engaged on the Rebel side in the battle of Bull Run. Mr. Pearce, of Md., earnestly opposed it, saying: "It will inflame suspicions which have had much to do with producing our present evils; will disturb those who are now calm and quiet; inflame those who are restless; irritate numbers who would not be exasperated by any thing else; and will, in all probability, produce no other real effect than these. Being, then, useless, unnecessary, and irritating, it is, in my opinion, unwise." The vote was then taken, and the amendment adopted: Yeas 33; Nays -Breckinridge and Powell, of Ky., Johnson and Polk, of Mo., Kennedy and Pearce, of Md.-6. The bill was then engrossed, read a third time, and passed.

When this bill reached the House, it encountered a most strenuous and able opposition from Messrs. Crittenden and Burnett, of Ky., Vallandigham and Pendleton, of Ohio, and Diven, of N. Y.

Mr. Cox, of Ohio, moved (August 2d) that the bill do lie on the table; which was negatived: Yeas 57; Nays 71.

569

Mr. Thaddeus Stevens closed a vigorous speech in its favor with this impressive admonition:

"If this war is continued long, and is bloody, I do not believe that the free people of the North will stand by and see their sons and brothers and neighbors slaughtered by thousands and tens of thousands by rebels, with arms in their hands, and forbear to call upon their enemies to be our friends, and to help us in subduing them. I, for one, if it continues long, and has the consequences mentioned, shall be ready to go for it, let it horrify the gentleman from New York [Mr. Diven] or anybody else. That is my doc

trine: and that will be the doctrine of the whole free people of the North before two years roll around, if this war continues.

"As to the end of the war, until the Rebels are subdued, no man in the North thinks of it. If the Government are equal to the people-and I believe they are-there will be no bargaining, there will be no negotiation, there will be no truces with the Rebels, except to bury the dead, until every man shall have laid down his arms, disbanded his organization, submitted himself to the Government, and sued for mercy. And, sir, if those who have the control of the Government are not fit for this task, and have not the nerve and mind for it, the people will take care that there are others who are-although, sir, I have not a bit of fear of the present Administration or of the present Executive.

"I have spoken more freely, perhaps, than gentlemen within my hearing might think politic; but I have spoken just what I felt. I have spoken what I believe will be the result; and I warn Southern gentlemen that, if this war is to continue, there will be a time when my friend from New York [Mr. Diven] will see it declared by this free nation that every bondman in the South-belonging to a Rebel, recollect; I confine it to them-shall be called upon to aid us in war against their masters, and to restore this

Union."

The bill was now recommitted, on motion of Mr. Pendleton, of Ohio; and an attempt by Mr. Stevens to reconsider this decision was defeated by laying on the table-Yeas 71; Nays 61. It was reported back next day from the Judiciary Committee by Mr. Bingham, of Ohio, so amended as to strike out the section relating to slaves-adopted on motion of Mr.

Trumbull as aforesaid-and insert | Van Horne, Verree, Wallace, Charles W.

instead the following:

"SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That, whenever hereafter, during the present insurrection against the Government of the United States, any person claimed to be held to labor or service, under the laws of any State, shall be required or permitted by the person to whom such labor or service is claimed to be due, or by the lawful agent of such person, to take up arms against the United States, or shall be required or permitted by the person to whom such service or labor is claimed to be due, or his lawful agent, to work or be employed in or upon any fort, navy-yard, dock, armory, ship, or intrenchment, or in any military or naval service whatever, against the Government and lawful authority of the United States, then, and in every such case, the person to whom such service is claimed to be due shall forfeit his claim to such labor, any law of the State or of the United States to the

contrary notwithstanding; and whenever thereafter the person claiming such service or labor shall seek to enforce his claim, it

shall be a full and sufficient answer to such claim, that the person whose service or labor is claimed had been employed in hostile service against the Government of the United States, contrary to the provisions of

this act."

Mr. Bingham called for the previous question on the reading of the bill, as thus amended, which was seconded. Mr. Holman, of Indiana, moved that the bill be laid on the table; which was beaten: Yeas 47; Nays 66. The amendment of the Judiciary Committee was then agreed to; the bill, as amended, ordered to be read a third time, and passed, as follows:

YEAS-Messrs. Aldrich, Alley, Arnold, Ashley, Babbitt, Baxter, Beaman, Bingham, Francis P. Blair, Samuel S. Blair, Blake, Buffinton, Chamberlain, Clark, Colfax, Fred erick A. Conkling, Covode, Duell, Edwards,

Eliot, Fenton, Fessenden, Franchot, Frank, Granger, Gurley, Hanchett, Harrison, Hutchins, Julian, Kelley, Francis W. Kellogg, William Kellogg, Lansing, Loomis, Lovejoy, McKean, Mitchell, Justin S. Morrill, Olin, Potter, Alex. H. Rice, Edward H. Rollins, Sedgwick, Sheffield, Shellabarger, Sherman, Sloan, Spaulding, Stevens, Benj. F. Thomas, Train, 'July 25, 1861.

Walton, E. P. Walton, Wheeler, Albert S. White, and Windom-60.

NAYS-Messrs. Allen, Ancona, Joseph Baily, George H. Browne, Burnett, Calvert, Cox, Cravens, Crisfield, Crittenden, Diven, Dunlap, Dunn, English, Fouke, Grider, Haight, Hale, Harding, Holman, Horton, Jackson, Johnson, Law, May, McClernand, McPherson, Mallory, Menzies, Morris, Noble, Norton, Odell, Pendleton, Porter, Reid, Robinson, James S. Rollins, Sheil, Smith, John B. Steele, Stratton, Francis Thomas, Vallandigham, Voorhees, Wadsworth, Webster, and Wickliffe-48.

The bill, thus amended, being returned to the Senate, Mr. Trumbull moved a concurrence in the House amendment, which prevailed by the following vote:

YEAS-Messrs. Anthony, Bingham, Browning, Clark, Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale, Harris, King, Lane, of Ind., Lane, of Kansas, McDou gall, Sherman, Simmons, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, Wade, and Wilson-24.

NAYS-Messrs. Breckinridge, Bright, Carlile, Cowan, Johnson, of Mo., Latham, Pearce, Polk, Powell, Rice, and Saulsbury—11.

Mr. Clark, of New Hampshire, submitted the following:

"Be it resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That we, as representatives of the people and States, respectively, do hereby declare our fixed determination to maintain the supremacy of the Government and the integrity of the Union of all these United States; and to this end, as far as we may do so, we pledge the entire resources of the Government and people, until all rebels shall submit to the one and cease their efforts to destroy the other."

Which was adopted: Yeas 34; Nays 1-Mr. Breckinridge.

Mr. S. S. Cox, of Ohio, asked the House to suspend its rules to enable him to offer the following: him to offer the following:

"Whereas, it is the part of rational beings to terminate their difficulties by rational methods, and, inasmuch as the differences between the United States authorities and the seceding States have resulted in a civil war, characterized by bitter hostility and extreme atrocity; and, although the party in the seceded States are guilty of

July 29th.

S. S. COX AND W. P. JOHNSON FOR 'PEACE.'

[blocks in formation]

571

[graphic]

dent of the United States, after the 4th of March, 1861, respecting the Army and Navy of the United States, and calling out or relating to the militia or volunteers from the States, are hereby approved, and in all respects legalized and made valid, to the same intent, and with the same effect, as if they had been issued and done under the previous express authority and direction of the Congress of the United States."

The amendment was agreed to, and the bill thereupon passed, as follows: Yeas 33;

NAYS-Messrs. Breckinridge, Kennedy, Polk, Powell, and Saulsbury-5.

"That, whilst it is the duty of Congress, by appropriate legislation, to strengthen the hands of Government in its efforts to maintain the Union and enforce the supremacy of the laws, it is no less our duty to examine into the original causes of our dissensions, and to apply such remedies as are best calculated to restore peace and union to the country: Therefore, it is

"Resolved (The Senate concurring herenine members of this House and four memin), that a Joint Committee, to consist of bers of the Senate, be appointed to consider and report to Congress such amendments to the Constitution and laws as may be necessary to restore mutual confidence and insure a more perfect and endurable Union amongst these States."

This bill was, the same day, reconsidered, and the above amendment, being moved afresh, was again adopt- table: Yeas 72; Nays 39—nearly a This proposition was laid on the ed: Yeas 37; party division. And Mr. Diven, of NAYS-Messrs. Breckinridge, Bright, Ken- N. Y., thereupon asked the unaninedy, Pearce, and Powell-5.

[blocks in formation]

mous consent of the House to enable him to offer the following:

"Resolved, That, at a time when an armed rebellion is threatening the integrity of the Union, and the overthrow of the Govern ment, any and all resolutions or recommendations designed to make terms with armed rebels are either cowardly or treasonable."

Mr. Vallandigham objected; and the House refused to suspend the rules: Noes 36; Ays 56—not twothirds.

The session terminated by adjournment at noon, August 6th, having lasted but thirty-three days.

XXXV.

MISSOURI.

WE have seen Conventions of the people of several States coolly assume the power, asserted or reserved in no one of their respective Constitutions, to take those States out of the Union, and absolve their people from all ob

ligation to uphold or obey its Government, in flagrant defiance of that Federal charter, framed for and adopted by the people of the United States, and by them recognized and accepted as the supreme law of the

MISSOURI BETRAYED BY JACKSON.

573

land, anything in the Constitution | press terms, irrevocable. We have and laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. We have seen one of these Conventions assume and exercise the right of revoking a fundamental compact between the State and the Union, which is, by its ex

[blocks in formation]

seen State Legislatures, in default of Conventions, usurp, practically, this tremendous power of secession; and have heard a now loyal Governor proclaim that a popular majority for Secessionists, in an election of mem

[graphic]
[ocr errors]

MAP OF MISSOURI,

bers of Congress, might serve to nul-
lify the obligation of the citizens of
that State to the Federal Constitu-
tion and Union. We are now to con-
template more directly the spectacle
of a State plunged into secession and

'Pollard, in his "Southern History," says:
"Upon the election of Abraham Lincoln, the

civil war, not in obedience to, but in defiance of, the action of her Convention and the express will of her people-not, even, by any direct act of her Legislature, but by the will of her Executive alone.' Gov. Jackson,

Border States were unwilling to rush into dissolution until every hope of a peaceful settlement

« PreviousContinue »