Southern Review, Volume 6A.E. Miller, 1830 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 85
Page 163
... Supreme Court of the United States is able to afford under its arbitrament - or , in other words , whether the States are absolutely remediless in the premises of such an usurpation or violation , short of revolution itself . Mr ...
... Supreme Court of the United States is able to afford under its arbitrament - or , in other words , whether the States are absolutely remediless in the premises of such an usurpation or violation , short of revolution itself . Mr ...
Page 166
... Supreme Court is the final and absolute arbiter be- tween the States and the General Government - positions we not only utterly deny , but the admission of which 166 [ Aug. Debate on Mr. Foot's Resolution .
... Supreme Court is the final and absolute arbiter be- tween the States and the General Government - positions we not only utterly deny , but the admission of which 166 [ Aug. Debate on Mr. Foot's Resolution .
Page 170
... Supreme Court . It then , Sir , became a Govern- ment . It then had the means of self - protection ; and but for this it would in all probability , have been now among things which are past . Having constituted the Government and ...
... Supreme Court . It then , Sir , became a Govern- ment . It then had the means of self - protection ; and but for this it would in all probability , have been now among things which are past . Having constituted the Government and ...
Page 172
... Supreme Court , in the usurpations of the General Government , the will of a majority in Congress is supreme without the possibility of redress or even appeal , on the part of the States . There is , therefore , no axiom so cardinal or ...
... Supreme Court , in the usurpations of the General Government , the will of a majority in Congress is supreme without the possibility of redress or even appeal , on the part of the States . There is , therefore , no axiom so cardinal or ...
Page 174
... Supreme Court and Mr. Webster looked to the preamble of the Constitution as furnishing a just exposition of the source of its authority , they should also have examined the test of its ratification , which declares that it was " done in ...
... Supreme Court and Mr. Webster looked to the preamble of the Constitution as furnishing a just exposition of the source of its authority , they should also have examined the test of its ratification , which declares that it was " done in ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
admit Alexandrian ancient animals appears appellate jurisdiction Aristotle authority Bonaparte cause character citizens clause common compact Congress considered Constitution Convention declare deluges doctrine doubt duties edition Eusebius exclusive exercise existence express Fabr favour Federal Federalist feeling foreign France French friends give Greek Griesbach happiness honour inferior interest Isocrates Jonson Josephine judges judicial power judiciary justice labour legislature liberty limestone Louis XIV Madame Madison manuscripts means ment moral nature never Nolan object observations old red sandstone opinion original parties persons philosophy phrenologists Plato political possess present preserved principles protection purpose Pythagoras question reason regard rendered resolution says shew society South-Carolina Southern Review sovereign sovereignty strata supposed Supreme Court tariff tariff of 1824 Testament thing tion treaty tribunals Union United usurpation versions violation Virginia Volpone votes Vulgate Webster whole words
Popular passages
Page 174 - ... in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise :hese That of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the States who are parties thereto have the right and are in duty bound to interpose, for arresting the progress of the evil and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them.
Page 164 - ... each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions, as of the mode and measure of redress.
Page 98 - I loved the man, and do honour his memory, on this side idolatry, as much as any. He was (indeed) honest, and of an open and free nature; had an excellent phantasy, brave notions, and gentle expressions...
Page 163 - States are parties, as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting that compact; as no further valid than they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact ; and that, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers not granted by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right and are in duty bound to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities,...
Page 98 - I remember the players have often mentioned it as an honour to Shakespeare that in his writing (whatsoever he penned) he never blotted out a line.
Page 168 - Having constituted the government, and declared its powers, the people have further said that since somebody must decide on the extent of these powers, the government shall itself decide, subject always, like other popular governments, to its responsibility to the people. And now, sir, I repeat, how is it that a state legislature acquires any power to interfere?
Page 438 - On the other hand it is perfectly clear that the sovereign powers vested in the state governments, by their respective constitutions, remained unaltered and unimpaired, except so far as they were granted to the government of the United States.
Page 163 - The states then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated...
Page 463 - Executive and a convenient number of the National Judiciary, ought to compose a council of revision with authority to examine every act of the National Legislature before it shall operate, and every act of a particular Legislature before a Negative thereon shall be final; and that the dissent of the said Council shall amount to a rejection, unless the Act of the National Legislature be again passed, or that of a particular Legislature be again negatived by of the members of each branch.
Page 168 - But who shall decide this question of interference ? To whom lies the last appeal ? This, sir, the constitution itself decides also, by declaring " that the judicial power shall extend to all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States.