The Attorney General's Survey of Release Procedures, Volumes 2-3U.S. Government Printing Office, 1939 - Criminal procedure |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... supra note 6 , at 294 et seq . Another device for escaping punishment which featured the criminal law of the Middle Ages was sanctuary and abjuration . By fleeing to a place of sanctuary before trial , the criminal could gain partial ...
... supra note 6 , at 294 et seq . Another device for escaping punishment which featured the criminal law of the Middle Ages was sanctuary and abjuration . By fleeing to a place of sanctuary before trial , the criminal could gain partial ...
Page 18
... supra note 56 , at 598 . 631 Binney 99 ( Pa . 1806 ) [ italics supplied ] . Grinnell , supra note 56 , at 600. Indictments were treated with great technical strictness in the early English courts . 4 Bl . Comm . * 393 , n . 2 . Grinnell ...
... supra note 56 , at 598 . 631 Binney 99 ( Pa . 1806 ) [ italics supplied ] . Grinnell , supra note 56 , at 600. Indictments were treated with great technical strictness in the early English courts . 4 Bl . Comm . * 393 , n . 2 . Grinnell ...
Page 19
... supra note 56 , at 603 . Comm . v . Miller Snell ( 1932 ) , cited in Grinnell , supra note 56 , at 604 . * Grinnell , supra note 56 at 605 . proposed a new section 9 of chapter 143 , relating 19.
... supra note 56 , at 603 . Comm . v . Miller Snell ( 1932 ) , cited in Grinnell , supra note 56 , at 604 . * Grinnell , supra note 56 at 605 . proposed a new section 9 of chapter 143 , relating 19.
Page 20
... note reveals the emergence of a new purpose in the Massachusetts scheme of dealing with of- fenders . The original ... supra note 56 , at 610 . Years of experience with a milder and more individualized type 20.
... note reveals the emergence of a new purpose in the Massachusetts scheme of dealing with of- fenders . The original ... supra note 56 , at 610 . Years of experience with a milder and more individualized type 20.
Page 21
... supra note 56 , at 611-612 . sachusetts courts were to operate in this matter under un- 21.
... supra note 56 , at 611-612 . sachusetts courts were to operate in this matter under un- 21.
Common terms and phrases
administration adult probation agencies Allegheny County analysis appointed Atlantic County bation California Code Ann common pleas court conduct convicted Cook County County court crime Cuyahoga County defendant defendant's discretion District of Columbia employment Erie County Essex County fact factors favorable outcome Federal felony grant probation Hamilton County Hennepin County Ibid Illinois imposed imprisonment incarceration Jersey judges judicial jurisdictions Kings County Massachusetts ment Minnesota Missouri municipal court offender offender's Ohio outcome on probation Pennsylvania percent personnel persons placed on probation practice presentence investigation prison probation departments probation law probation officer probation period probation service probation system probation units probationary probationers procedure qualification Ramsey County record rehabilitation relationships release require result revocation Rhode Island selection sessions social social-work Stat statistical Suffolk County supervision Supp supra note suspended sentence tion tioners treatment U. S. District Courts unfavorable Vermont violations Wisconsin York
Popular passages
Page 217 - I, , do solemnly swear, in the presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Union of the states thereunder ; and that I will, in like manner, abide by and faithfully support all...
Page 461 - Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above : therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
Page 49 - Humanity and good policy conspire to dictate that the benign prerogative of pardoning should be as little as possible fettered or embarrassed. The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity that, without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
Page 389 - The discretion intended, however, is not a capricious or arbitrary discretion, but an impartial discretion, guided and controlled in its exercise by fixed legal principles.
Page 104 - The ordinary legal meaning of 'conviction,' when used to designate a particular stage of a criminal prosecution triable by a jury, is the confession of the accused in open court, or the verdict returned against him by the jury, which ascertains and publishes the fact of his guilt; while 'judgment
Page 291 - ... (3) That duly accredited officers of a sending state may at all times enter a receiving state and there apprehend and retake any person on probation or parole. For that purpose no formalities will be required other than establishing the authority of the officer and the identity of the person to be retaken.
Page 227 - A pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offense and the guilt of the offender; and when the pardon is full, it releases the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so that in the eye of the law the offender is as innocent as if he had never committed the offense.
Page 206 - An act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, and for other purposes," approved July 17, 1862, and which sections are in the words and figures following: "SEC.
Page 291 - ... if at the time when a state seeks to retake a probationer or parolee there should be pending against him within the receiving state any criminal charge, or he should be suspected of having committed within such state a criminal offense, he shall not be retaken without the consent of the receiving state until discharged from prosecution or from imprisonment for such offense.
Page 139 - A pardon in our days is not a private act of grace from an individual happening to possess power. It is a part of the Constitutional scheme. When granted it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed.