The Attorney General's Survey of Release Procedures, Volumes 2-3U.S. Government Printing Office, 1939 - Criminal procedure |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 72
Page
... Standards for Probation Service - Existing Qualification Requirements - Methods of Selection and Dis- charge " In - Service ” Training of Personnel - Summary . CHAPTER IV . THE SELECTIVE PROCESS - ELIGIBILITY FOR PRO- BATION_ Statutory ...
... Standards for Probation Service - Existing Qualification Requirements - Methods of Selection and Dis- charge " In - Service ” Training of Personnel - Summary . CHAPTER IV . THE SELECTIVE PROCESS - ELIGIBILITY FOR PRO- BATION_ Statutory ...
Page iii
... Standards for Probation Service - Existing Qualification Requirements - Methods of Selection and Dis- charge " In - Service " Training of Personnel - Summary . CHAPTER IV . THE SELECTIVE PROCESS - ELIGIBILITY FOR PRO- BATION_- Statutory ...
... Standards for Probation Service - Existing Qualification Requirements - Methods of Selection and Dis- charge " In - Service " Training of Personnel - Summary . CHAPTER IV . THE SELECTIVE PROCESS - ELIGIBILITY FOR PRO- BATION_- Statutory ...
Page 30
... standards for the service and to coordinate the work . To- day two - thirds of our States have enacted probation legisla- tion , in one form or another , but " more than one - half of them have narrowly prescribed its application or ...
... standards for the service and to coordinate the work . To- day two - thirds of our States have enacted probation legisla- tion , in one form or another , but " more than one - half of them have narrowly prescribed its application or ...
Page 35
... standard classification of criminal offenses adopted in 1932 for use in the Bureau of the Census and in the Federal Bureau of Investiga- tion . See Judicial Criminal Statistics , 1935 ( U. S. Department of Commerce , 1937 ) 7 et seq ...
... standard classification of criminal offenses adopted in 1932 for use in the Bureau of the Census and in the Federal Bureau of Investiga- tion . See Judicial Criminal Statistics , 1935 ( U. S. Department of Commerce , 1937 ) 7 et seq ...
Page 40
... standards set by the bureau . It is evident that the powers of these State supervisory agencies , with a few exceptions , are too limited to permit active State participation in probation work . Few have any authority in the selection ...
... standards set by the bureau . It is evident that the powers of these State supervisory agencies , with a few exceptions , are too limited to permit active State participation in probation work . Few have any authority in the selection ...
Common terms and phrases
administration adult probation agencies Allegheny County analysis appointed Atlantic County bation California Code Ann common pleas court conduct convicted Cook County County court crime Cuyahoga County defendant defendant's discretion District of Columbia employment Erie County Essex County fact factors favorable outcome Federal felony grant probation Hamilton County Hennepin County Ibid Illinois imposed imprisonment incarceration Jersey judges judicial jurisdictions Kings County Massachusetts ment Minnesota Missouri municipal court offender offender's Ohio outcome on probation Pennsylvania percent personnel persons placed on probation practice presentence investigation prison probation departments probation law probation officer probation period probation service probation system probation units probationary probationers procedure qualification Ramsey County record rehabilitation relationships release require result revocation Rhode Island selection sessions social social-work Stat statistical Suffolk County supervision Supp supra note suspended sentence tion tioners treatment U. S. District Courts unfavorable Vermont violations Wisconsin York
Popular passages
Page 217 - I, , do solemnly swear, in the presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Union of the states thereunder ; and that I will, in like manner, abide by and faithfully support all...
Page 461 - Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above : therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
Page 49 - Humanity and good policy conspire to dictate that the benign prerogative of pardoning should be as little as possible fettered or embarrassed. The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity that, without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
Page 389 - The discretion intended, however, is not a capricious or arbitrary discretion, but an impartial discretion, guided and controlled in its exercise by fixed legal principles.
Page 104 - The ordinary legal meaning of 'conviction,' when used to designate a particular stage of a criminal prosecution triable by a jury, is the confession of the accused in open court, or the verdict returned against him by the jury, which ascertains and publishes the fact of his guilt; while 'judgment
Page 291 - ... (3) That duly accredited officers of a sending state may at all times enter a receiving state and there apprehend and retake any person on probation or parole. For that purpose no formalities will be required other than establishing the authority of the officer and the identity of the person to be retaken.
Page 227 - A pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offense and the guilt of the offender; and when the pardon is full, it releases the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so that in the eye of the law the offender is as innocent as if he had never committed the offense.
Page 206 - An act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, and for other purposes," approved July 17, 1862, and which sections are in the words and figures following: "SEC.
Page 291 - ... if at the time when a state seeks to retake a probationer or parolee there should be pending against him within the receiving state any criminal charge, or he should be suspected of having committed within such state a criminal offense, he shall not be retaken without the consent of the receiving state until discharged from prosecution or from imprisonment for such offense.
Page 139 - A pardon in our days is not a private act of grace from an individual happening to possess power. It is a part of the Constitutional scheme. When granted it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed.