The Attorney General's Survey of Release Procedures, Volumes 2-3U.S. Government Printing Office, 1939 - Criminal procedure |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 6
... determined on the basis of the evidence presented by the prosecution . Further , the person on trial could not retain an attorney to represent him . See Snodgrass v . State , 67 Tex . Cr . 615 , 150 S. W. 162 ( 1912 ) for a ...
... determined on the basis of the evidence presented by the prosecution . Further , the person on trial could not retain an attorney to represent him . See Snodgrass v . State , 67 Tex . Cr . 615 , 150 S. W. 162 ( 1912 ) for a ...
Page 12
... determined . However , this act remains the law of the State . The consti- tutionality of an amendment of 1931 40 which authorizes State ex rel . Payne v . Anderson , 43 S. D. 630 , 181 N. W. 839 ( 1921 ) . 35 State v . Moran , 43 Nev ...
... determined . However , this act remains the law of the State . The consti- tutionality of an amendment of 1931 40 which authorizes State ex rel . Payne v . Anderson , 43 S. D. 630 , 181 N. W. 839 ( 1921 ) . 35 State v . Moran , 43 Nev ...
Page 23
... determine . Such officer shall be under the general control of the chief of police of said city and be allowed a place in his office . He shall make reports as often at least as once in every 3 months , to said chief of police of the ...
... determine . Such officer shall be under the general control of the chief of police of said city and be allowed a place in his office . He shall make reports as often at least as once in every 3 months , to said chief of police of the ...
Page 36
... determine the number of offenders who are under the supervision of probation officers , 102 101 These two tables appear as tables 22 and 24 , respectively , in Judicial Criminal Statistics , 1936 ( U. S. Department of Commerce , 1938 ) ...
... determine the number of offenders who are under the supervision of probation officers , 102 101 These two tables appear as tables 22 and 24 , respectively , in Judicial Criminal Statistics , 1936 ( U. S. Department of Commerce , 1938 ) ...
Page 56
... determine what objec- tives have been attained and what services have been ren- dered . This practice is to be encouraged , since only objective 20 Atlantic County , N. J .; Onondaga County , N. Y .; Hennepin County , Minn .; Allegheny ...
... determine what objec- tives have been attained and what services have been ren- dered . This practice is to be encouraged , since only objective 20 Atlantic County , N. J .; Onondaga County , N. Y .; Hennepin County , Minn .; Allegheny ...
Common terms and phrases
administration adult probation agencies Allegheny County analysis appointed Atlantic County bation California Code Ann common pleas court conduct convicted Cook County County court crime Cuyahoga County defendant defendant's discretion District of Columbia employment Erie County Essex County fact factors favorable outcome Federal felony grant probation Hamilton County Hennepin County Ibid Illinois imposed imprisonment incarceration Jersey judges judicial jurisdictions Kings County Massachusetts ment Minnesota Missouri municipal court offender offender's Ohio outcome on probation Pennsylvania percent personnel persons placed on probation practice presentence investigation prison probation departments probation law probation officer probation period probation service probation system probation units probationary probationers procedure qualification Ramsey County record rehabilitation relationships release require result revocation Rhode Island selection sessions social social-work Stat statistical Suffolk County supervision Supp supra note suspended sentence tion tioners treatment U. S. District Courts unfavorable Vermont violations Wisconsin York
Popular passages
Page 217 - I, , do solemnly swear, in the presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Union of the states thereunder ; and that I will, in like manner, abide by and faithfully support all...
Page 461 - Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above : therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
Page 49 - Humanity and good policy conspire to dictate that the benign prerogative of pardoning should be as little as possible fettered or embarrassed. The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity that, without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
Page 389 - The discretion intended, however, is not a capricious or arbitrary discretion, but an impartial discretion, guided and controlled in its exercise by fixed legal principles.
Page 104 - The ordinary legal meaning of 'conviction,' when used to designate a particular stage of a criminal prosecution triable by a jury, is the confession of the accused in open court, or the verdict returned against him by the jury, which ascertains and publishes the fact of his guilt; while 'judgment
Page 291 - ... (3) That duly accredited officers of a sending state may at all times enter a receiving state and there apprehend and retake any person on probation or parole. For that purpose no formalities will be required other than establishing the authority of the officer and the identity of the person to be retaken.
Page 227 - A pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offense and the guilt of the offender; and when the pardon is full, it releases the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so that in the eye of the law the offender is as innocent as if he had never committed the offense.
Page 206 - An act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, and for other purposes," approved July 17, 1862, and which sections are in the words and figures following: "SEC.
Page 291 - ... if at the time when a state seeks to retake a probationer or parolee there should be pending against him within the receiving state any criminal charge, or he should be suspected of having committed within such state a criminal offense, he shall not be retaken without the consent of the receiving state until discharged from prosecution or from imprisonment for such offense.
Page 139 - A pardon in our days is not a private act of grace from an individual happening to possess power. It is a part of the Constitutional scheme. When granted it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed.