 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 712 pages
...grounds of the motion which are relevant here, however, are that the evidence does not establish any negligence on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of the injury, and that there is no evidence in support of the particular acts of negligence alleged in... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1206 pages
...defendant, whether the plaintiff was In the exercise of due care, and whether there was evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of the injury. 1. The defendant concedes that In going to the station to procure tickets for use the next... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 1134 pages
...negligence of the defendant. In order to recover the plaintiff must show to your satisfaction that there was negligence on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of the death of the deceased. Such negligence Is never presumed. It must be proved by the plaintiff. Where... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1914 - 1418 pages
...and assumption of risk of the injury by plaintiff. The jury rendered a verdict showing a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of the injury, but the verdict omits any finding upon the other two issues of contributory negligence... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1294 pages
...question for the jury was whether, under all the circumstances, the placing of the car was a negligent act on the part of the defendant, which was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's loss. We find no exception calling for reversal. I favor affirmance. All concur, except... | |
 | Appellate courts - 1901 - 822 pages
...does the failure to make such proof tend to establish the plaintiffs case, which must rest on proof of negligence on the part of the defendant, which was the proximate cause of the injury. &. SAME — RAILROADS — INSPECTION or CARS. Where a railroad company has established... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 720 pages
...then it is competent for you to consider whether that act of suddenly starting the train was an act of negligence on the part of the defendant, which was the proximate cause of the injury to her. If she fell off, if she started to get off while that train was in motion, if, supposing... | |
 | John Milton Gardner, Walter James Eagle - Employers' liability - 1901 - 836 pages
...standing room inside the coach, and whence, from a sudden jerk from the train, he was thrown to the cut off from, the three rear cars, he could have controlled...him constituted an act of negligence on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. The rules of the company provided... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1242 pages
...to avoid the collision, and that so arranging the brakes without notifying him constituted an act of negligence on the part of the defendant which was...the conductors should be responsible for the safety, prompt movement, and proper care of their trains, and for the conduct of the men employed thereon;... | |
| |
... of negligence on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of the collision. 
