..."Establishment" Clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions. In many instances, the Congress or state legislatures conclude that the general welfare of society,...

...'Establishment' Clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public...

...the 'EstabClause doei not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions. In many instances, the Congress or state legislatures conclude that the general welfare of society,...

...'Establishment' clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public...

...'Establishment' clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public...

...'Establishment' clause does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." This rationale suggests that the use of the motto "In God We Trust" on currency, on documents and public...

...lishment clause "does not ban federal or state regulation of conduct whose reason or effect merely happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions." In the Bible Reading Case, the Court was most explicit. It laid down a "test" as follows : "what are...

...when it ruled that legislation related to abortions does not violate the Establishment Clause just because it "happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions."v2 Third, one might argue that no branch of government should 21 decide when life begins...

...controlling weight to the preferential effect of the statute, however, reasoning that a tax provision "'does not violate the Establishment Clause merely...harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions.'" Citing Gillette v. United States, 401 US 437 (1971), which allowed draft deferment benefits to opponents...

...prefer one religion over another, it does not follow that a statute violates the establishment clause because it happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions. I note in passing that a number of theologians and religious leaders who are quick to suggest that...