Page images
PDF
EPUB

There is the very serious difference of 60 per cent in our opinions. One of us must be under a very great error. I could, if it were not rendered unnecessary by their being the same, as he will hereafter find described by a scientific and practical gentleman, Mr. Martineau, to a committee of the House of Commons, give a series of experiments on sugar and treacle, made many years ago, accompanied, also, with a set of twelve distillations (in a still of a suitable size which I procured to be made for the purpose) of small portions of beer formed from as many different original specific gravities in the worts; which experiment I then entered on with the view to ascertain the fact of the accordance, or not, of the final proportion of proof spirit with the original gravity, as shewn by the hydrometer; due reference being had to all the circumstances. The results of each, and of all of these examinations, did so remarkably correspond with the several circumstances as to afford the most convincing testimony to my mind that every hydrometer, now in use, is truly and correctly, a measure of sweets, although that appellation is given to one, only, among the several sorts now constructed.

But I must not expect that my own experiments, and consequent decision will be deemed of sufficient authority to be conclusive with others. I am happy, therefore, in the op portunity to adduce far superior proof, premising, that the average value of each 8 bushels of malt is known as annually, to every brewer who has employed an hydrometer for a sufficient time to understand its uses. I say, annually, because the produce of saccharine matter varies with the favou ableness of the harvest and season to the barly; as well as very materially according to the method of malting it. But a quarter of malt, weighing from 300lbs. to 350lbs., usually yields from 75 to 80.bs. of sacchaine matter. A like quantity and no more is afforded by 185lbs. to gulbs. of sugar, or by 224 to 240lbs. of treacle. The produce of the last two is found merely by a solution of them in waters; and finally, the separate value of all the three is found by the production of spirit, uniformly correpanding with the gravities of their extracts, or solutions. The evidence I have alluded to is taken from a parliamentary "Report of the Sugar Distillery Committee," ordered by the house to be printed 17th February, 1807, The object being to 'nquire how far reef weight be afforded to the West India proprietois by the use of sugar in the breweries and distilleries, Ge committee after having examined (fica the 2d to the 13th Jan.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

1807) the persons most competent to give them information, say in page 4:-" It appears to the committee that taking the price of the quarter of malt, capable of producing 80 lbs. of saccharine matter at 82s. the quantity of sugar necessary to produce an equal proportion of saccha"rine matter must be 1 cwt. 3 qrs. 1 lb. (197 lbs.) which at 58s. * the cut. would amount to 101s. 6d. in price, making a "difference in favour of the malt of 19s. 64. in that given quantity. It is stated, besides, in evidence, that the beer produced from sugar, even if the prices "would admit of it, is not equal in any degree to that produced from its equi"valent quantity of malt, and couse

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

"

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

quently that the brewer would not use sugar in their manufactory, unless they "were prohibited by law from using grain. -In page 16, Mr Jackson commissioner of excise, examined by the committee, says, "I recollect that about the year 1800 or 1801, when sugar was by law permitted to be used in the brewery, on account of the scarcity of grain at that "time, very little sugar was used. One or two brewers in London, two at Man"chester, and some at Liverpool, wers

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]

have made such experiments as to con"vince my own mind, completely." And being desired to state the cpinion he had formed in consequence, said: “I have a very "short statement shewing the compan "tive value of malt with sugar, and of mo"lasses with malt." Mr. Martineau then | delivered in the following paper to the committee, which was read." December 14,

1709, experiments on a sample of browa "Muscovado sugar at 53s. 3d. per cwt., and "the same on a sample of molasses at 40s. per cwt. One pound of the above sugar

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors]

was dissolved in a gallon of water, and "then boiled half an hour, it lost by evapo tation rather more than a quart, wied quantity being restored with cold was, and reduced to the heat of 60 degrees, it

[ocr errors]

* My estimate of the price of sugar was 61s, and any quantity 150 lbs. the cost of which would be 100s. gd. I believe it is now dearer than 61s.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

46

66

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

10, "then weighed by Quin's hydrometer 14lbs, 8-10ths." (consequently) "75lbs. of the same extract, which is about the fair average produce of a quarter of malt would consume 185lbs. of sugar, which, at 53s. 3d. per cwt. is 87s. 5d. One pound of mo"lasses treated exactly as the sugar had been weighed by the same instrument 12lbs. "4-10hs; therefore 75lbs. of the same ex"tract would consume 216 lbs. oftreacle, "which at 49s. the cwt. is 77s, 1d." To other questions put to him by the committee, Mr. Martineau answered, that he took "not the best malt; that such malt as would yield 80lbs, of saccharine matter per quarter would require an equivalent of 197lbs. of sugar, and 230lbs. in treacle; "that he never tried either sugar in molas-guished for their abilities, and well known "ses in brewing, being so perfectly satisfied, by the result of the experiments that they made so completely against the "use of sugar, that he never was induced "to try it in the brewhouse."-Candidus may still think that it is not philosophical to conclude, (even from this useful ex"amination by Mr. Martineau), that the "extract of malt must necessarily be richer " and superior to the others." Such however, was the conclusion of the committee, in their report to the house; and who will depreciate the further proof that is afforded by distillation? In page, 22, 24 of this Report will be found the examination of Mr. Smith of Brentford, and of Mr. Benwell of Battersea - both very eminent, and extensive distillers. They state the "then prices, (in January 1807) of "the different materials suitable to their

worts, and of their wash, as ascertained by hydrostatics, from whatsoever saccharine and fermentable matters such musts and wash, are drawn.-Other parliamentary inquiries and reports on the same subject might be adduced, in confirmation, particularly the first, second, and third Reports of the Committees on the Distillation of Sugar, ordered to be printed 15th June 1508, any part of which it must be unnecessary to quote. I cannot however refrain from stating the following proof that the mucilage is of no consideration, to destroy the brewer's confidence in the competency of hydrometers to exhibit a just comparison between sweets. In the years 1805 and 1806, three gentlemen, distin

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

"

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

use, to be barley at 44s. and malt 81s, the

quarter, and sugar 61s. to 6?s. the cwt. "but that the price of sugar should be from "32s. to 33s. to induce the distillers to use "that article in their trade, and that even "then the spirit distilled would not be "either of so good a quality as that distilled "from malt and barley, or so disposable in "the market. Also, that to tempt the "distillers to use molasses it should (to "bear a proportion to barley at 44s. and "malt at 81s. the quarter) bear the price "of 24s. the cwt, and even then the molasses is considered a worse article in the "distillery than sugar." Now the judgement of these gentlemen, and by which they govern their practice in business, is founded on the actual produce of ardent spirit obtained from the different quantities of the several materials, and which, as was observed in my letter at page 770 of your Register, is well known to them to be ever in a ratio to the original gravity of their

acquirements in chemistry, (viz. Drs." Thompson, Hope, and Coventry) were se lected by government to inquire into the differences in value between the English and Scotch barleys and malts, for which purpose they took with them some practical assistants to conduct the operations of both brewing and distilllng. I have unfortunately parted with their very valuable Report, printed by order of parliament, containing the particulars of numerous trials made by them. I recollect enough, however, to be able to say that their uniform rule, for finding the dif ferences between the two grains, was by the gravity of their extracts, as shewn by the hydrometers of various constructions. From which gravities, and the constant agreement of the produce of spirit with them, they formed a numerical rule for ascertaining at once, the proportion of alcohol, and consequently of spirits of every degree of strength, prodücable from every given gravity of mast. The operation of their thus discovered (decimal) multiplicator.on the gravity of must. taken with the attendant circumstances,, as the multiplicand, affords such very close agreement with the evidences in the above,

parliamentary reports" as to remove every particle of doubt, as to the conclusions to be drawn in the present question. One other remark calls on me to be noticed," that a third wort of 10lbs per barrel cannot be so valuable as a third part of the first wort of 30lbs per barrel, because the latter contains a less proportion of mucilage to the sweets than the last worts." Agreed; but what then would be the produce of a fourth liquor on the grains, which, according to the inference, would contain a still larger proportion of mucilage to the sweet? I say that this produce from the previous exhaustion of the grains would not exceed, in mucilage and saccharine mat

tenances then lately erected and built near the Mills on the Banks of the River Wey. within the said manor, then. in the occupation of John Bardow, Esq.; and all those two Iron Mills erected on the banks of the said river and near the said last mentioned messuage or tenement, and then in the occupation of the said John Bardow, and used by him in the Iron and Steel Manu.

ter combined, 2 or at the most 3lbs. per quarter which is a quality that is inapplicable to form any sort of beer. And even in these 2 or 3lbs. not the mucilage, but the remnant of saccharum, constitutes the whole of the nutritive quality, without which the refuse (usually left in the grains) would not deserve the low price at which it is sold. With every sentiment of respect towards this evidently able, though mistaken gentle-facture; and all those warehouses, storeman, I appeal to himself whether the testimony of the several scientific, practical, and truly respectable men I have quoted, from such unquestionable authority, is or is not conclusive? And if so, it is surely fair to ask what becomes of the alledged advantage of 40 per cent. in favour of sugar; and, also, which of us is it who " has advanced an opi"nion that will not stand the test of rigid "examination?"-I am, Sir, yours, very respectfully,A HAMPSHIRE BREWER.Dec. 5, 1808,

P. S.-On your account, Mr. Cobbett, as well as my own, I decline all future public discussion of this subject.. But if this respectable gentleman wishes to know me, he may saristy his curiosity by addressing a letter to M. B. (with his own name and address) at No. 11, Princes Street, Cavendish Square, which shall be noticed in return to him, with all respectful attention.

DUKE OF YORK.An Act to enable His Majesty to grant the Inheritance, in Fee Simple, of certain Manors, Messuages, Lands, and Hereditaments, in the Parishes of Byfleet, Weybridge, Walton, Walton Leigh, and Chertsey, in the County of Surry, to His Royal Highness Frederick Duke of York and Albany, for a valuable Consideration. Passed the 9th March, 1804.

Whereas his late majesty king George II. by letters patent bearing date the 11th June, 1760, for the consideration therein mentioned, did demise, graut, and to farm let, unto Henry then earl of Lincoln and afterwards duke of Newcastle, all that the manor or. lordship, manors or lordships, and lands, of Byfleet and Weybridge, and the park of Byfleet called Byfleet or Weybridge Park, or lying and being in Byfleet and Weybridge, with all and singular the appurtenances, in the county of Surry, together with the capital messuage or tenement, stables, and other outhouses thereto belonging, then in the occupation of James Incebird; and all that messuage or tenement with the appurtenances then in the occupapation of Joseph Spence; and all that messuage or tenement with the appur

houses, smith's shop, and all other build-
ings thereto belonging or therewith used;
which said messuages, mills, warehouses,
and storehouses, were buildings which re-
quired to be repaired and rebit, and were
of greater yearly value than the manor,'
lands, park, and other premises above-meu-
tioned; together with all meadows, pas
tures, lands, tenements, profits, righ's,
liberties, privileges, immanities, beredita-
ments, and appurtenances to the said ma-
nor or lordship, manors or lordships; lands,
park, messuages, mills, and other build-"
ings and edifices, or any parcel of them or
any of them appertaining or in any manner
belonging; (excepting nevertheless and al-
ways reserving all great trees, timber trees,
saplings, woods, underwoods, mines, and
quarries, growing or being in or upon the
said premises or any of them); to hold the
same unto the said Henry earl of Lincoln
his executors, administrators, and assigns,
from the 5th Jan. 1784, (at which time
former term then in being would expire),
for the term of 26 years, at the yearly rent
of 15. 3s Sd. And whereas his present
majesty, by letters patent bearing date the
30th Oct. 1773, for the considerations there
in mentioned, did demise, grant, and to
farm let, unto the said Henry then duke of
Newcastle, all and singular the said manet,
or lordship, manors or lordships, park.
messuages, &c. &c. comprized in and de-
mised by the said herein-before mentioned
letters patent of the 11th June, 1760, with
their and every of their rights, royalties,
members, and appurtenances (except as in
the said herein-before mentioned letters pa-
tent is excepted), to hold the same unto
the said Henry duke of Newcastle,his execu
tors, &c. for a reversionary term of 13
years, to be computed from the 5th Jan.
1810 (at which time the before-mentioned
term of 26 years would expire), at the
yearly rent of £15. 3s. 8d. theretofore pay
able, and an increased rent of £2. 16s. 4d.
(making toge her £18) until the 5th Jan,
1810, and at the yearly rent of £50 for
the first 13 years of the said reversionary
term of 13 years, to commence from the
said 5th Jan. 1810, and at the rent of £25

for the last half-year of the said reversionary term and whereas his said present majesty, by other letters patent bearing date the 7th Aug. 1780, did demise, grant, and to farm let, unto the Rev. R. Palmer, D.D. and Thomas Hurst, gent., all that manor of Walton Leigh in Surry, with all and singular its rights, members, and appurtenances, and all those rents of the free tenants there, by a particular thereof amounting yearly to £3. O. 74d.; and all those rents of the tenants by copy of court roll, and at the will of the lord there, by a particular thereof amounting yearly to 10.0s. 9d.; and all those messuages, lands, and tenements, in the hands of the said tenants by copy of court roll, and at will under the yearly rents aforesaid, and all that annual or fee farm rent of 3s. a year, issuing out of the lands and tenements theretofore granted to E. Porter; and all that seite of the manor of Walton Leigh and all demesne lands there with their and every of their appurtenances, by a particular thereof mentioned to be of the yearly rent or value of £10. 18s.; and all that increased rent there, by a particular thereof, amounting yearly to 9s. 3d.; and all that common fine there, by a particular thereof amounting yearly to 2s.; and all those perquisites of courts there, one year with another, by a particular thereof valued and estimated at £5. 11s. 11d. a year; which said manor of Walton Leigh and other the premises last above-mentioned, by a particular thereof were mentioned to be parcel of the possessions theretofore purchased of Giles Leigh, esq., and annexed to the honour of Hampton Court, and all and singular messuages, mills, houses, edifices, structures, barus, stables, dovehouses, orchards, gardens, lands, tenements, meadows, feedings, pastures, commons, common of pasture, demesne land, glebe lands, Wastes, furzes, heaths, moors, marshes, advantages, profits, waters, water-courses, fisheries, fishings, suits, sokes, mulets, warrens, rents, reversions, and services, rent charges, rents seck, and rents and services, as well of the free as customary tenauts, tepants works, farms, fee farms, annuities, reliefs, heriots, fines, amercia ments, courts leet, views of frankpledge of court and leet, and leets perquisites and profits, and all things which to courts leet and view of frankpledge belong or apper. tain, chattels, waifs, estrays, goods and chattels of felons and fugitives, felons of themselves and put in exigent, bondmen, natives and villains, with their sequels, estovers, aud common of estovers, fairs, markets, tolls, exemption from paying toll,

customs, rights, jurisdictions, liberties, franchises, privileges, profits, commodities, advantages, emoluments, and hereditaments whatsoever, of whatsoever nature, kind, or specie the same were or by whatsoever names soever they were known, understood, called, or were theretofore known, situate, lying, and being, coming or arising or growing within the manor therein-before mentioned, or within the village, town fields, or places or parish of Walton Leigh and Walton-upon-Thames in the said county of elsewhere, whatsoever to the said manor, messuages, lands, tenements, &c. in anywise belonging or appertaining, happening or appending, or as part, parcel, or member of the same manor, messuages, lands, tenements, and other the said premises or any of them, had, taken, accepted, occupied, used, or reputed, and also the reversion or reversions, remainder or remainders whatsoever of the said manor and the said lands, &c. depending, happening, or in expectancy, from, in, or upon any demise or grant, demises or grants, for term or terms of life, lives, or years, or otherwise of the same premises or any parcel thereof, of record or not of record; and also all and singular rents and yearly profits whatsoever reserved upon every demise or grant of the same premises or any parcel thereof (excepting nevertheless and always reserving to his majesty, his heirs and successors, all lands, tenements, and hereditaments, then or theretofore being or reputed to be parcel of the said manor of Walton Leigh which were inclosed in Oatlands Park, or in any other of his majesty's parks, or reserved for the depasturing of the fallow deer and wild beasts, and also all other lands, &c. in Walton Leigh aforesaid or within the precinct of the said manor of Walton Leigh, which were theretofore purchased by any of his said present majesty's progenitors or ancestors, kings or queens of England, or any other person or persons whatsoever, besides the said Giles Leigh only; and also excepting and always reserving all great trees, woods, underwoods, knights fees, wards, marriages, mines, and quarries of the said premises, and all timber trees, and fair saplings apt and fit for timber, and sufficient staddles growing in and upon the said premises; and also all and singular, advowsons, free donations, dispositions, and right of patronage of all and singular rectories, vicarages, chapels, and other ecclesiastical benefices whatsoever to the same premises or any parcel of the same belonging, appertaining, happening, or appending); and

also all those lands and tenements in Walton aforesaid, therein-after particularly mentioned and expressed, that is to say, one close called Dodd Croft, containing by estimation 6 acres inclosed together, &c.; and one close lying near Hill Croft in Walton aforesaid called Pollard,containing by esti mation 3 acres, and one close called Russels, containing by estimation 4 acres ; and one close called Barn Close theretofore adjoining to a certain tenement then demolished and purchased of the said Tho. Driver; and all those lands in the field called Hill Croft in Walton aforesaid, containing by estimation 84 acres of arable land; and all that close of wood called Little Lee, lying in the common field in Walton aforesaid ; and all those arable lands in the field called Winkmeershill, containing by estimation. 6 acres, &c.; and also one parcel of land in Walton aforesaid, called an Eyte, containing by estimation half an acre of meadow, &c. And whereas his said present majesty, by other letters patent bearing date the 7th March, 1770, for the considerations therein mentioned, did demise, grant, and to farm let, unto Sarah Hodges and Susannah Hodges, spinsters, all that messuage, tenement, or farm house, called or known by the name of Brooklands, in the county of Surry, and all barns, stables, outhouses, &c. to the said messuage, &c. belonging, containing by admeasurement 3 acres, rood. and 12 perches or thereabouts; and also those 11 several closes or parcels of arable, meadow, and pasture land situate together and lying round the said messuage, containing in the whole by admeasurement 169 acres, 1 rood, and 35 perches; and also all those two several closes or parcels of meadow situate together between the river Waye on the west and certain lands therein-after mentioned on the east, containing together 25 acres, 2roods, and 9 perches, and also all those two several closes or parcels of arable land situate together between Walton common on the east, and the lands therein-after mentioned on the north and west, containing together 20 acres and 17 perches or thereabouts; all which said several closes or parcels of land and premises, containing in the whole 218 acres, 1 rood, and 33 perches, belonged to and were to be held with the said messuage, &c. and also all that new built messuage or tenement called the Eight Acres, adjoining to the lands first therein above described, &c. and all those 11 several closes or parcels of land situate together and lying round the said last mentioned messuage, and containing 59 acres, and 27 perches, all which said preises are situate together within the parish

of Weybridge, and were then in the tenure or occupation of George Payne, esq. together with all ways, passages, waters, rivers, streams, fisheries, &c. to hold the said messuage, &c. first therein above men tioned to be demised and granted with the several parcels of land thereto belonging, &c. unto the said Sarah Hodges and Susannah Hodges, their executors, &c. for a reversionary term of 12 years, to commence from the 5th January, 1788, and to hold the said new built messuage with the appur tenances and the several parcels of land thereto belonging containing 59 acres and 27 perches with the appurtenances unto the said Sarah Hodges and Susannah Hodges, their executors, &c. for a reversionary term of 31 years and the half of another year to commence and be computed from the said 5th January, 1788, at the yearly rent of five pounds eight shillings and sixpence for the first thirty-one years of the said last mentioned reversionary term, and at the rent of two pounds fourteen shillings and threepence, &c. And whereas his said present ma jesty, by other letters patent bearing date the 3d May, 1785, for the considerations therein mentioned, did demise, grant, and to farm let, unto the right hon. George earl of Tyrconnel and John Johnston, esq. all and sin gular the said messuages, lands, &c. comprised in and demised by the said letters patent of the 7th March, 1770, with the and every of their appurtenances (except as in the said letters patent excepted), to hold the said messuage, &c. with the said several closes or parcels of land thereto belonging, and above-mentioned 218 acres, I rood, and 33 perches with their appurtenances (except as before excepted), unto the said George earl of Tyrconnel and John Johnston, their executors, &c. from the 5th July, 1500 (at which time the term then in being would expire), for a reversionary term of 15 years, at the yearly rent of £16. 10s. 24. and to hold the said new built message lastly therein described with the said several closes or parcels of land and premises thereto belonging and above-mentioned to con tain 59 acres and 27 perches with the ap purtenances (except as before excepted), unto the said George earl of Tyrconnel and John Johnston, their executors, &c. from 5th July, 1819 (at which time the term then in being would expire,) for a rever sionary term of 15 years, at the yearly rent of £9. 14s. Sd. And whereas his said present majesty, by other letters patent bear ing date the 8th April, 1785, for the conside rations therein mentioned did denise, grant, and to farm let, unto Nicholas Elcock, all

« PreviousContinue »