The American Journal of International Law, Volume 7, Parts 1-2James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1913 - Electronic journals |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 29
Page 4
... Colonies . Both of these arrangements , however , served only a tem- porary purpose , and neither of them proved satisfactory to the United States . Another attempt to end this controversy was made in 1888 when the so - called Bayard ...
... Colonies . Both of these arrangements , however , served only a tem- porary purpose , and neither of them proved satisfactory to the United States . Another attempt to end this controversy was made in 1888 when the so - called Bayard ...
Page 8
... - men in British waters , and therefore subject to the same governmental control exercised by Great Britain and her Colonies over British subjects . The United States , on the other hand , showed 8 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.
... - men in British waters , and therefore subject to the same governmental control exercised by Great Britain and her Colonies over British subjects . The United States , on the other hand , showed 8 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Page 9
... Colonies could be the sole judge of the question of reasonableness . Much to the satisfaction of Great Britain , the Tribunal did not sup- port the extreme contention of the United States that Great Britain had transferred to the United ...
... Colonies could be the sole judge of the question of reasonableness . Much to the satisfaction of Great Britain , the Tribunal did not sup- port the extreme contention of the United States that Great Britain had transferred to the United ...
Page 10
... Colonies , can be the sole judge of the reasonableness of fisheries regulations in treaty waters and they fulfil , quite as effectively as the rules originally recom- mended by the award would have fulfilled , the requirement of the ...
... Colonies , can be the sole judge of the reasonableness of fisheries regulations in treaty waters and they fulfil , quite as effectively as the rules originally recom- mended by the award would have fulfilled , the requirement of the ...
Page 11
... left solely to Great Britain or her Colonies . The sixth question ranked next to the first in importance . This ques- tion was introduced into the arbitration by Newfoundland , and THE FINAL OUTCOME OF THE FISHERIES QUESTION 11.
... left solely to Great Britain or her Colonies . The sixth question ranked next to the first in importance . This ques- tion was introduced into the arbitration by Newfoundland , and THE FINAL OUTCOME OF THE FISHERIES QUESTION 11.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affairs agreement American fishermen arbitration Article award Balkan belligerent belligerent occupation Britain Canada Cardinal Alberoni China Christian claim Clayton-Bulwer treaty colonies commission conference Congress Constantinople Constitution contracting court debt debtor declared delegates dipl diplomatic discussion Dominions Droit duties embassy established fact fisheries foreign France French Germany Hague Convention Hay-Pauncefote treaty Imperial Ottoman Government Imperial Russian Government important indemnity Institute of International interest-damages international law International Opium International Opium Commission Italy legislation matter ment Minister Monroe Doctrine moratory interest Morocco naval negotiations neutralization obligation October Ottoman Bank Panama Canal Paris parties payment political Powers present President Princes principles proposed public callings purpose question reason recognized reference regard regulations relations responsibility rules Secretary secure Senate Sept ships society of nations sovereignty Spain stipulations Sublime Porte territory tion treaty of 1818 tribunal Turkey Turkish pounds United vessels Vie Int vital interests
Popular passages
Page 23 - canals or railways, being open to the citizens or s¿ubjects of the United States and Great Britain on equal terms, shall also be open on like terms to the citizens and subjects of every other state which is willing to grant thereto such protection as the United States and Great Britain engage to afford.
Page 33 - The canal, when constructed, and the entrances thereto shall be neutral in perpetuity, and shall be opened upon the terms provided for by Section 1 of Article III of and in conformity with all the stipulations of the treaty entered into by the Governments of the United States and Great Britain on November 18,
Page 42 - If the work should ever be executed, so as to admit of the passage of sea vessels from ocean to ocean, the benefits of it ought not to be exclusively appropriated to any one nation, but should be extended to all parts of the globe upon the payment of a just compensation or reasonable tolls.¿
Page 248 - “directly or indirectly, for the citizens or subjects of the one, any rights or advantages in regard to commerce or navigation through the said canal which shall not be offered on the same terms to the citizens or subjects of the other,” and
Page 248 - “shall enter into treaty stipulations with such of the Central American States as they may deem advisable for the purpose of more effectually carrying out the great design of this convention, namely, that of constructing and maintaining the said canal as a ship communication between the two oceans, for the benefit of mankind, on equal terms to all,” and
Page 31 - by whatever route may be considered expedient and to that end to remove any objection which may arise out of the convention of the 19th April, 1850, commonly called the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, to the construction of such canal under the auspices of the Government of the United States, without impairing the “general
Page 340 - that We wish for no victories but those of peace; for no territory except our own; for no sovereignty except the sovereignty over ourselves. We deem the independence and equal rights of the smallest and weakest member of the family of nations entitled to
Page 23 - that, — “The canal shall be free and open to the vessels of commerce and of war of all nations observing these rules, on terms of entire equality, so that there shall be no discrimination against any such nation, or its citizens or subjects, in respect of the conditions or charges of traffic, or otherwise. Such conditions and charges of traffic shall be just and equitable.”, The
Page 24 - of July, 1899, provided, nevertheless, that they do not affect the vital interests, the independence, or the honor of the two contracting states, and do not concern the interests of third parties. The
Page 26 - as follows: It is agreed that no change of territorial sovereignty or of the international relations of the country or countries traversed by the beforementioned canal shall affect the general principle of neutralization or the obligation of the high contracting parties under the present treaty.